Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
We have a bunch of workflows in our public gallery that have no inputs, and so the results are the same no matter who runs them, it just depends on the time. It is a huge oversight and a massive waste of resources that a person can only see workflow results for the times that one user ran the workflow. If I have user A run a workflow at 10AM and user B doesn't know about it, he's going to run it at 10:05 AM and we just wasted valuable compute time and resources to produce the same exact data set.
Or, say it runs on a schedule, and you want people to access the results via gallery instead of saving as spreadsheet or something somewhere. But you can't. Only the person who setup the schedule can see the results.
Now, I can see that some workflow applications may produced different results based on inputs, and some results may be sensitive. But then at least make it a check box when publishing the workflow to gallery whether or not results should b shared globally.
Many organizations have IT applications (Splunk, OSIsoft PI, etc.) that can consume, historize, and monitor Windows Performance Monitor items. If would be great if Alteryx wrote application-specific information to PerfMon. Things like: number of engines running, number of workflows in the queue, number of people logged into gallery, time it takes for data to pass between DB/Controller/Gallery, etc. This would go a long way in helping admins to properly size systems and monitor them for upsets.
Hey Alteryx Dev Gurus -
I've got a situation wherein the user runs something in Gallery, and complains. I have to log in as that user to view the output files that came back out. As a super user, I should be able to have all seeing ability! Thanks!
brian
If you run an Alteryx app on your desktop or hard drive, a help button will appear in the bottom right. This button defaults to sending you to help.Alteryx.com, but you can adjust it to send you to any location by adjusting the app in the interface designer. This means that you could use the help button to send users to a location detailing how to actually use the app built. The issue comes that when you upload an Alteryx app to the Alteryx Gallery, the "help" button disappears. I propose that the help button be made available in the Alteryx gallery for apps so that designers can use it to direct users to locations detailing how to use the apps.
Whilst executing long running jobs in Gallery, it would be useful to be able to view the log so I can judge progress.
Our company has workflows where we use the Gallery API to kick off executions on server. The user kicking off the workflow has setup API access using his account, but when he kicks off his jobs, it does not show up under his Gallery so he is unable to view the results. In the admin panel, it shows the owner as (None) so it does not appear that workflows kicked off via the API get assigned to the user tied to the API key.
Conversations with Alteryx support revealed that these results are available via an API call, but not within the Gallery web UI. It would be great if the user tied to the API key were added to the workflow execution so they could see results within the Gallery rather than going back through the API.
As an Admin, I would like to be able to see, from the Gallery, a single place where the history of workflows that have been run is displayed. Right now I can only see workflows running or queued. I would like to be able to look back at past executions and see status, runtime, errors, etc.
This data is currently available in Designer on our Alteryx Server. But right now our system is just one environment. I'm not sure if when we expand to multiple Gallery and Worker machines where I will have to look for workflow history.
Also, Workflow schedules can only be seen in Gallery, and not Designer. So it would be nice to have everything in one place.
For whatever reason a schedule is disabled, whether a Studio expires, or for any other legitimate reason, a notification email should be sent to the Admin and the one that created the schedule in advance of it being disabled. When a scheduled workflow is not executed, it leaves us scrambling for answers. A sudden disablement of the schedule is disappointing to discover after all other stones have been turned. Notify us in advance of a schedule being disabled.
A suggestion, in our environment, we see workflows getting into Initializing Status often in scheduler (this could be because of the environment we are in)
If workflow in “Initializing” Status > n minutes (where n is configurable)
Then
Kill the workflow, and resubmit
Ref: Case # 00260492
Currently 'Schedules' are a separate category in the navigation bar on the left, and while it is nice to have an overview of all my workflows/apps, most of the time I need that information in the Private Studio screen where I'm checking in on the run status and getting ready to schedule the job again.
Additionally, Designer disables the schedule whenever it saves the workflow/app back to the Server. This is not always the desired intent when we make a small change to the workflow/app. Having an option to disable a current schedule would be better, with the default to keep the current schedule. Also, the abilty to manage the schedule from the Private Studio to say 'Activate' a disabled schedule, or schedule the workflow/app multiple times with different inputs would all be good.
As a Curator, I need Artisans to be able to create & maintain their own Gallery connections (rather than only Curators)
- My Artisans use their own credentials in their connections
- Their credentials are subject to a periodic reset policy, so they need a self-service capability to update their connection credentials (and sharing settings)
I really want to see this feature in new versions. Its frustrating the lack of options we have with scheduling workflows on the server. I need to have my process run every 10 mins but only on certain days and in certain time windows. Creating a schedule for this is impossible unless I manually create hundreds of schedules.
I have a few workflows that I have hosted on out Gallery Server and I have them scheduled.
Ex: Process A is scheduled to run every 10 mins Mon – Sunday.
Problem: I only need Process A to run Every 10 Mins on Mon – Sat from 2 AM to 6 PM
Currently there is not a scheduling configurations that allow this type of schedule. How can I get my workflow to run every 10 mins but only during certain times and on certain dates?
When you enable SAML authentication for Alteryx Server it does allow Single Sign IN but it does not support Sign OUT. This means that after you close your browser the session remains active. If the browser is opened again and the Gallery page is loaded it will pick up the session that was activated before instead of creating a new session. At the very least a session time out limit should be added.
A strange issue is found that the Alteryx Gallery schedule suddenly becomes disabled. After checking with support, it looks like the mechanism underlying is using a concept of queueID. Whenever there is a network issue between controller and worker, the queueID get scratched, the job gets corrupted. This means it cannot calculate the next run and thus, it will disable the schedule. When the worker node gets back, it cannot "try again".
From usage perspective, if network is having issue, it is assumed that the connection gets back, it would "re-try" and resume.
Hope Alteryx team can help consider a fix on this technical issue.
Thanks.
Hello,
Currently we are working on an issue where we are seeing an "inbound pipe" error during a scheduled workflow, terminating at the error.
However, the workflow doesn't officially complete; it simply terminates.
For the majority of workflows, when a workflow runs with errors, completing with errors, even if the workflow was unsuccessful, you can send an email via the events for that workflow, if the workflow completes with errors, to use as an alert or trigger, etc...
However this doesn't work when a workflow suddenly terminates with errors.
I'd like to see functionality added to all ow for an email event when a workflow terminates unexpectedly, without completing.
This way, I could set up a job to re-trigger the workflow if this happens.
This can occur when memory is swamped during the initial workflow.
This functionality would be a huge positive.
Thanks
With Version 2018.3, you removed the Autodetect SMTP button, and with it, have rendered the Email Tool virtually useless for many people, which is a shame because it is a critical tool for some of us to share reports produced in Alteryx.
In requiring an SMTP path, there are a host of authentication issues that need to be addressed, and we can't seem to figure out how to configure the path and From emails properly to allow the tool to work without errors.
My only solution at this point is to rollback to 2018.2 so I can continue to use the Email tool.
Please address this so we can use the tool as before, or provide the necessary configuration options to allow for proper authentication with popular email services (Gmail, etc.)
Right now, with LSS, the only thing you can query who has taken seats on licenses (you get user's email and host name). This is OK, but it would be great if we could get more information than that. Primarily
As you know, there is no way to forcefully remove a license from the LLS (you either have to have user deactivate from Designer, or wait 7 days). Knowing this information would help admin's know who is actually using the licenses and if someone leaves the company, you can get a countdown until that license is released.
For historical tracking and auditing, I would also like to setup an Alteryx Workflow that puts licensed user information into a table or DB so we have a log of who is using the licenses.
So you've created your workflow with variable inputs and saved it to the server. Would love to schedule the workflow to run on a recurring basis with saved input values. I.e. single workflow with multiple schedules with different saved values.
I think this may be covered here, is there an update?
We really like the idea of the Server Usage Report. But the PDF is somewhat limited and we use Power BI instead of Tableau. It would be great if the Workflow had an option for outputting to Power BI.
Right now, if you are using Windows Authentication, you can map AD group and users on the Permissions and Collections tab. But for some reason, you can't use AD groups on the Data Connections tab. Most of our databases are already secured by in-house AD groups in which you have to be a member in order to access that database. Instead of managing a 2nd, most likely duplicate, list of users in the Data Connections tab I would like to be able to map the pre-existing AD group to that data connection. That also means I don't have to service access requests. If someone wants access to a database, they talk to the database owners, get added to the group and then they automatically can pull that data into Alteryx.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
3 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |