Featured Ideas
Hello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
The idea is to have tabs on separate pages in the Gallery (or the option to allow that type of behavior). Right now, if you created an analytic app that has questions on different tabs they will be on separate pages in Designer, but when you push the workflow to the Gallery all the questions will be on the same page. The tabs act as a navigation bar instead of taking you to separate pages.
Here's two different discussions that ask about this in case there is any confusion:
- Enhancement
- UX
Hi Server users,
It is amazing to know the permissions we have when accessing our own profile, but sometimes that is not enough. Knowing your server role is needed to perform a few tasks and it would be fantastic to have something simple like the example below.
- Enhancement
- UX
If two users sit in the same studio and have multiple scheduled workflows in that studio, both users can see the results of those schedules under "Workflow Results" -> "My Jobs"/"Jobs Shared with Me"
It gives both users in the studio good visibility of all the workflow results they have access to.
Now if we move to a 1 studio-1 user environment and share workflows and schedules via collections, this "Workflow Results" -> "Jobs Shared with Me" functionality is empty. Instead users have to go to each schedule individually to see the results from them there.
So if you're in a 1 studio-many users environment, there is a single place to go to see all workflow results. But if you're in a 1 studio-1 user environment and sharing via collections, you have to go to infinitely many places to see the results of all the schedules shared with you.
So my idea is to have results from schedules shared via collections appear in Workflow Results.
Greetings Server friends!
I was talking with @KevinP in the Solutions Center at Inspire and we talked a lot about how Server has been evolving over the last several versions. I'd like to request that end users be able to select workflows or applications shared with them as "Favorites." It would be great for ServerUI to offer a separate section for these selected "favorites" so that the end users can have a single go-to place to access their most frequently used apps.
- New Request
- UX
It would be a very pleasing user experience if we could enjoy the Server usage with a true dark mode. The customization in the Theme-Panel isn't advanced enough to do it ourselves - unless we deep dive into the css-files. The CSS already has a good structure and the dark mode could be enable with just a few changes.
Here is a comparison of my server in light and dark mode.
 
 
It's probably noticeable that I haven't studied Design, but it should give a rough suggestion how it could look.
Obviously not everyone wants a dark mode, therefore every user should have toggle in the user settings to switch between light and dark mode.
Hi all,
For a user to know if a schedule was successful or not, they need to go schedule by schedule to check each of them.
I suggest adding one additional column to show the status of the last run.
Something like this:
Thank you,
Fernando Vizcaino
- Enhancement
- UX
Issue: When Workflow names have similar beginnings on server a user cannot distinguish between them because the columns on this GUI are not expandable as would be expected. A user has to make their browser larger and all columns open proportionately.
Solution: Change column settings so users can drag column widths to make changes. A bonus would be to allow a user to set a default along with an option to always auto expand all.
The current Alteryx user interface is displayed in a vertical orientation without the option for customization. To optimize space efficiency, it would be highly advantageous if the filters could be arranged horizontally, as depicted in the attached figure.
Additionally, there is a usability issue with the options list for interface tools like the list box. Currently, all options are displayed without utilizing a dropdown, requiring users to scroll extensively when multiple tools with numerous options are present within a single analytic app. Implementing a dropdown functionality for improved navigation would significantly enhance the overall user experience.
- Enhancement
- UX
Hello all,
It appears that every time we have a talk about the gallery organization, people bugs around the difference between district and collection. Adopting a new semantic with less confusion would lead to
: -a more intuitive product for everyday life
-less question and less confusion during pre-sales/POC/Training.
Best regards,
Simon
Option to Zip All Outputs
For workflows that produce various different output files, I think it would be nice if the Gallery had the functionality to create a single zip file containing all outputs. The user would opt in or out of this functionality using a checkbox in the Gallery workflow settings (for apps, this checkbox could also appear as an additional setting above "Questions"). After the workflow has been run, the user would only see the zip file in the output preview instead of each individual output file.
This functionality would create a more user-friendly experience as it would eliminate the need for zip file creation workarounds, such as using the Run Command Tool or the "zipfile" Python library to create zip files (these options also do not generate a zip file in the Gallery output preview).
- New Request
- UX
Hi,
The schedules page on server needs an overhaul. Sorry to be so blunt but it is awful. It is by far the worst aspect of Alteryx and one of the most important at the same time.
Here are a few points about it...
1.) Sorting needs to be fixed as it doesn't work correctly (sorting on the first column, "Workflow", returns items that start with 'L', 'S' and a zero as the first three on the list), so looking for 1 scheduled item across 10+ pages of schedules becomes a "needle in a haystack" endeavor.
2.) There are no search and/or filter capabilities which would help alleviate the pain-point mentioned above.
3.) [Missing] items automatically removed from schedule when the workflow is removed from the server. It just jumbles up the screen with useless information.
4.) The 'Schedule' column doesn't need to reflect the name again like the 'Workflow' column. is a hyperlink and the other isnt. I cant tell you how many times I have clicked on the wrong hyperlink only to have to go back and deal with point #1 all over again. Can't it just be a simple calendar icon or something like that next to the Workflow name?
5.) While not as critical, but more of a 'nice to have' function. An ability to export the list of schedules would be helpful. If we ever need to divy up work for an employee that leaves the company it would be a good way to see all of the work they have out there and mark up the list to distribute info for reassignment purposes, etc.
I am sure there are other aspects I am missing, but here are the most important ones to me as an end-user (Not an Admin)
Thanks for listening. 🙂
- Scheduler
- UX
Hi everyone,
Since the Home page has been replaced by the My Workspace page as the main page on the Gallery, end-users are getting confused or at least uncomfortable with this transition.
It would be amazing to change the default main page to the Public tab or even remove/deactivate the My Files tab for these users.
Removing /deactivating the My Files tab will also correct an issue generated when an Artisan is downgraded to an end-user. Currently, these users can see their workflows in the My Files tab but can't access them.
Idea based on @phottovy 's question: https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Discussions/Change-quot-Public-quot-to-default-view-...
Hello,
We recently upgraded our on-prem instance of Alteryx Server/Gallery to version: -
- Client: 2020.1.0
- Server: 2021.3.3.63061
- Server Binaries: 2021.3.3.63061
- Service Layer
- Master: 2021.3.3.63061
We have noticed that the search functionality in various areas (top and right-side) no longer return results using a "contains" but rather it is doing an "exact" or "starts with" keyword search. This is very frustrating to many users as we can't easily find our workflows quickly compared to previous versions.
Please improve search functionality.
- Enhancement
- UX
I remember when i started using Alteryx and the gallery i was able to display the results of a workflow run and then copy a value from the screen to complete checks on.
Now when i run a workflow and the .yxdb results and displayed ever if its one record i have to download a file and open it just to copy the value.
Can we not get the screen to allow highlight and control c of text as required?
- Enhancement
- UX
Hi all,
Currently, it is very challenging, nearly impossible, to distribute your workload between worker nodes as the image below. Curators should be able to manage this in multiple ways since the end-user doesn`t have a full understanding of the server architecture or strategy behind the idea.
It would be helpful to have the worker tags working similarly to the credentials pyramid where we can have levels of permissions. That way, we can have collections, user groups or even single users with worker tags configured.
This is an addition to the idea suggested by @ivane_meimban
Thank you,
Fernando Vizcaino
- Enhancement
- UX
It would be good to see when a workflow started running on the gallery when looking at Workflow Resuts.
Currently it only tells you that the worklfow is running. Seeing when it started would be very helpful.
- Enhancement
- UX
The workflow result window shows the Name/workflow, AMP, Priority, Assigned worker, Run as, Completed at, Runlenght, and Runtyp of the workflow. The following feature would also be useful on the page.
1. Showing the creation date of the workflow without taking queue time into consideration
2. The option to change the time zone would make it easier to analyze the logs
3. Detailed insight about the particular workflow results, such as average execution time, failure count, and success count with date filtering.
Hello!
I found a weird bug in my travels today.
The TL:DR is that when a date input tool within the interface tool is used within a collapsing radio button, it defaults to "dd/mm/yyyy", breaking any app when this is not filled out:
Both values are default - i have not edited these values. The weirdest part is, this is Server/Private Gallery specific. When this workflow is downloaded and run within Designer:
And the workflow runs fine.
I have not tested this with any of the other interface tools, however I suspect this to not be the only tool this issue resides within.
I have attached the workflow I used (not that it would take long to recreate) for testing.
- Enhancement
- UX
When rerunning a failed manual job, the same Priority is used, but the Optional Job Name is not and cannot be re-entered on submit. User has to go to Workflow results page and Edit to add the Optional Job Name for a rerun.
I suggest the Optional Job Name text box be added to the rerun submit page.
Prefill using the original job's value if one exists.
Thanks,
MJ
- Enhancement
- UX
I am in the process of migrating apps from the old gallery to the new. I have screen captures of the results from the same app in both. In the older gallery version, if there is only a single file type available, it defaults to that file type and you click the icon for the type. In the new gallery version, you must select a file type before you can download the file, even if there is only a single type available. The dropdown makes sense for one that you have multiple types (like pcxml), but it makes no sense to require the user to go through an extra step to select a type before downloading when that's the only type they can download. Please see all the screen captures. The blue-ish background is from the new gallery.