Please create the functionality to be able to find Tool ID numbers within the frame of the canvas. When doing so now, I am only able to find tool names like Summarize, Data Cleansing, etc. For example, I want to be able to CTRL+F "152" and be taken to tool ID #152 directly on the canvas.
An added bonus would be to find by tool type like you can on Desktop.
Create a function in the Formula tool to pull Customer Managed Telemetry data like User ID, Job ID, and Start and End Runtime when running the workflow, instead of navigating to the Jobs tab separately and forgo matching the Job ID.
I'm happy to see there is now a DateTimeNowPrecise function, but you still have to convert this to a datetime with a DateTime tool, then get the min and max of this field to determine runtime.
Currently in Alteryx Cloud we cannot create groups of users.
Having groups of users means that sharing of content would be much more manageable (currently if I want to share a workflow I need to share it with users individually).
The ability to create groups of users and share content with them would be:
Thanks
We would like to have a means to capture
For controls and audit purposes, we need the above items. For now, the tedious work-around recommended was to write all records that were written to Excel users to a database table. This is not ideal.
Hello,
I love standards and ctrl+S is a pretty common on for the last four decades. Can we expect it to work also on Alteryx Designer Cloud please ? Even if it's in the browser, it seems possible since the guys at Dataiku managed to do it.
Best regards,
Simon
Hello,
I have noticed the AACP is upgraded at a fast pace... however, I don't know when and now I discover the upgrade when I go sometimes on the Release Notes https://help.alteryx.com/AAC/en/release-notes.html
So an email notifications with the changes would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Simon
Hello all,
One of the great things of Alteryx Designer on-premise is that we can do a huge quantity of diverse tasks in the same canvas :
-classic data preparation
-in-database
-report
-machine learning
-spatial/geographic analysis,
-building apps and macros,
-etc, etc
And frankly, the feeling I have after testing the different cloud applications is that there are way too many silos between app, not real integration... it seems more like a patchwork than a real homogeneous platform.
Personnally, and I think it's true for any historical Alteryx user, I would have far preferred exactly the same experience that we have in Designer, being able to seamlessy going to cloud or to on-premise, etc and then, some improvements with the other module.
(And since I do love Alteryx, I must say I'm waaaay disappoited. probably as much that when I saw the first release of Qlik Sense in 2015)
Best regards,
Simon
Hello all,
Sometimes, you find some messy worklow and you want to make it clean
You can align manually the tools but it would be better to have the exact same function than on Alteryx Designer on-premise :
Best regards,
Simon
Hello all,
Only one file format is supported by AutoML : csv. And we can't even choose the separator (not the same in the US and France).
Best regards,
Simon
Hello folks,
let's say it's my second greatest deception so far! Alteryx on-premise is not perfect but it supports a lot of file format... and here, three file formats only, and three that are not performant or rich : xls, xlsx, csv
I won't make an idea by missing file format but the bare minimum seems at least to support the same file formats than on-premise (like yxdb, hyper, parquet,kml, etc...)
Best regards,
Simon
Hello all,
I would like to move the Tool Configuration to the left instead of the default right (and save this configuration for me). 2 reasons for that :
1/ same experience than Designer on-premise
2/ less distance to do with the mouse
(also, if the tool palette could be movable upside.... would be great)
Best regards,
Simon
Hello,
Right now, there are a few filters available on the top of the window
Among the one Iwould like :
-status like status supported that would hide the "(Early Preview)".
-features (Import and Publish versus Import only)
Hello all,
On Alteryx Designer, you have a star (asterik) after the workflow name when it's not saved. Would be nice to have the same feature in Cloud, that's an easy, standard way to get the information.
Best regards,
Simon
Hello,
Correct me if I'm wrong but we can't export or import a workflow. That sounds a very easy and very useful function, especially when you develop something and want to share with others users.
Best regards,
Simon
Hello,
On Alteryx Designer on-premise, we can set background and text color (and other settings...). It's very useful because it allows to have a color palette by functional or technical feature of the container.
And as an example of the popularity of this color feature, this post on linkedin :
Best regards,
Simon
I want to create a dynamic output file name in both the Trifacta UI and New Designer Cloud UI. I know that I can create a timestamp or a parameter, but it seems like the parameterization in Trifacta is static. Instead of having to manually override the parameter every run, I am wanting to grab the desired filename from a field in the dataset. This is a functionality commonly used in Desktop Designer, so I'm hoping for it to be added to the Cloud soon!
Users have asked for the ability to create new versions of recipes so that they can collaborate safely. Also there is a need to keep an audit history of changes. Trifacta has recipe level history but that does not fulfil the whole use case of version control.
In a large enterprise, one of the perennial challenges is to manage changes to data over time. The industry is moving towards a shift-left philosophy to handle this by starting to think about data contracts and contract testing.
What does this mean for Alteryx?
Well - if you look at the strategy that DBT is following, each workflow has a defined entry data contract, and a defined exit data contract - so that if anything changes you can immediately tell if you are going to break someone else's work. This also sets you up for lineage in an important way - if you build in field and data-set level lineage from day zero - then you can look across an enterprise and answer questions like:
- If I remove this field - who will I impact downstream (e.g. other Alteryx users; Tableau dashboards etc)
- Who is using my data - so that I can talk to them about their data needs? Who do I need to tell if my workflow fails
- has someone upstream of me changed their flow in a way that breaks me?
- Where does this field come from - looking across a series of flows and transformations (critical for regulatory requirements).
This kind of thinking is hard to add in afterwards - so it would be good to build this into the product in these early days so that this becomes a key foundational piece.
When our users request for productionizing a request, we require that users share their flow with our Data Engineering and Data Operations team. Currently sharing with individuals is working, but you have to remember to put everyone's name in there. It would be nice if you could enter a GCP Group name that contains the users so they only have to remember one user.
Currently you have one top level folder. In order to keep flows and other objects organized it would be nice to create folders within folders. For example create a top folder called "Sales Data" and a subfolder called "Sales Pipeline Data".