Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
Hi,
We need a way to figure out at which tool alteryx workflow is currently at (i.e., workflow execution progress log) when the workflow is running on the alteryx server scheduler.
This is very useful especially if you have analytical workflows that take long time to run (say 4-6 hours) and at the moment there is NO WAY to figure out at which stage the execution is at from the scheduler.
We can't open the log file on the server as the workflow is IN PROGRESS (we get the standard The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process) . We can't see the underlying progress log under Scheduler Queue tab either.
It will be useful to capture that information in MongoDB or somewhere so that we can read the In progress log in the real time..
Thanks,
Sandeep.
In the Private Server settings, you can "Run As", but it is all or nothing -- anything on Scheduler will "Run As" the user coded (or you can leave it as the default which is the machine). It would be helpful if functionality existed like the Gallery - where you can dictate "Run As" for each individual module.
If you run an Alteryx app on your desktop or hard drive, a help button will appear in the bottom right. This button defaults to sending you to help.Alteryx.com, but you can adjust it to send you to any location by adjusting the app in the interface designer. This means that you could use the help button to send users to a location detailing how to actually use the app built. The issue comes that when you upload an Alteryx app to the Alteryx Gallery, the "help" button disappears. I propose that the help button be made available in the Alteryx gallery for apps so that designers can use it to direct users to locations detailing how to use the apps.
Hi,
As part of enterprise alteryx server deployments, would it be possible to remove alteryx server controller tokens and use asymmetric certificates (X509) instead?
Adrian
Sometimes when using someone else's Gallery App which has a long list of options to select from, I will hit Run before realizing that I haven't set all of the options. Then, the App fails (obviously).
Rather than just getting a message that my app run failed on the Gallery, it would be nice to have a link then that automatically re-loads the previous options I had set so I would be able to see which option I didn't fill out properly.
Wondering if there are any plans to change the RC4 encryption on alteryx server to something stronger (eg: AES, Blowfish etc)
Would be curious to see if anyone else in financial services has this challenge from a security perspective.
Adrian
When you enable SAML authentication for Alteryx Server it does allow Single Sign IN but it does not support Sign OUT. This means that after you close your browser the session remains active. If the browser is opened again and the Gallery page is loaded it will pick up the session that was activated before instead of creating a new session. At the very least a session time out limit should be added.
The mongo db back is a working process but I would like to replace individual workflows and not the entire server state.
In the example given, there are four scheduled jobs running in the server at the moment and one manual job is being triggered by the user and is in a queued state for more than 30 minutes to start running. However, in MongoDB, when a job is triggered, that time is captured as the start time (not considering the queue time). If we consider the start time of As_Queue in our workflow, we ended up with a mess. Since that manual job is queued for 30 minutes and running for only 3.30 hours, it is being killed by our workflow. It should only be killed after 4 hours.
With Version 2018.3, you removed the Autodetect SMTP button, and with it, have rendered the Email Tool virtually useless for many people, which is a shame because it is a critical tool for some of us to share reports produced in Alteryx.
In requiring an SMTP path, there are a host of authentication issues that need to be addressed, and we can't seem to figure out how to configure the path and From emails properly to allow the tool to work without errors.
My only solution at this point is to rollback to 2018.2 so I can continue to use the Email tool.
Please address this so we can use the tool as before, or provide the necessary configuration options to allow for proper authentication with popular email services (Gmail, etc.)
My question is, is there a way to see after a job is executed how much memory it consumed in total? Today we have monitoring set at server level that records memory consumption over time but it doesn’t tell which job caused the spike unless we manually go and check list of jobs executed around that time frame. Even with that we cannot know for sure which job is causing the spike.
Today there is no realtime inbuilt job monitoring tool that can answer questions like above.
So you've created your workflow with variable inputs and saved it to the server. Would love to schedule the workflow to run on a recurring basis with saved input values. I.e. single workflow with multiple schedules with different saved values.
I think this may be covered here, is there an update?
The idea here is that it would be very beneficial to allow general users to publish .YXZP packages to their server gallery (and/or the pubic gallery!!!). Currently, this can only be accomplished by a server administrator through the 'Admin' page on the server. It is also a completely different process than that of publishing Apps, Workflows, Macros etc., which can be done easily from the desktop designer.
For instance, I have developed an Adobe Analytics - Connector Toolkit, which is a .yxzp package, and is located HERE (check it out!). However, I do not have the ability to upload it to gallery.alteryx.com because I am obviously not an admin on the public gallery.
The neat thing about publishing packages to the server is that they appear just like Applications in the gallery. Descriptions can be added and you can even disable the default 'Run' button and provide a 'Download' or 'Save' button instead.
Hopefully, this is a feature that may be available in a future server release!
Regards.
Taylor Cox
P.S. - the Adobe Analytics - Connector Toolkit is also attached below.
Hi Alteryx,
Now, under the Job Tab, it is only show the status of running job.
Suggest to add one new page for showing the run history of each workflow/job.
1. Workflow name
2. Priority
3. Assigned Worker
4. Start time
5. End time
6. Duration
7. State
8. Job Type (schedule or manual tracker)
9. Owner
10. Message ( e.g. error log)
Best regards,
Samuel
When a process is running in foreground, the GUI does an excellent job of giving feedback to the user as to which "step" the job is running and how much data is processing through the active tools. When that same job is scheduled, the amount of information is limited to when the job began execution.
If a tool was able to give checkpoint status out to the user, we could better monitor the progress of scheduled jobs. The visibility to the job is most important for long running jobs. We've unfortunately had instances where we have had to cancel jobs and to restart them not knowing how close or how far from finishing they were.
Thanks for your consideration,
Mark
Hi Alteryx,
The scale of the column width in Alteryx Gallery is fixed.
Sometime may not show the whole word of that column, it is very inconvenience.
Actually, not only in gallery but also in designer. Like the Manage Data Connections pop-up window.
Even in 2019.4, the display problem hasn't been improved.
Can Alteryx improve the UI of gallery and designer asap?
Best Regards,
Samuel To
Hi All,
Is there any plan to create an automated way of publishing apps/workflows to the gallery. This has been a common painpoint for me on several different projects when I explain how manual of a process this is.
I'd imagine this could easily be solved by adding an additional API call to their library. Ideally, you'd be able to point the gallery to a shared folder with workflows you want to push (git repo functionality would even be better), and have it just move the .xml scripts to the server/mongoDB.
Best,
dK
All of the default values for the RuntimeSettings.xml can be found in the C:\Program Files\Alteryx\bin\RuntimeData\RuntimeSettings.xml.
These values are overridden by the RuntimeSettings.xml file in the ProgramData folder. Unfortunately, there is no “formal” documentation right now.
The suggestion would be to show users the universe of XML tags and their corresponding accepted value configs, and other data related to the XML entity.
Element Name ServiceProviderEntityID -> child of Authentication -> grandchild of SystemSettings
Field | Description |
Definition | This is the URL of the Alteryx Gallery authentication service provider. |
Required | Yes |
Allowed Value Data Type | String |
Allow Multiple Values | No |
XML Example | <ServiceProviderEntityID>https://gallery.alteryx.com/aas</ServiceProviderEntityID></ServiceProviderEntityID> |
Currently, even if Alteryx Server is installed in E drive, RuntimeSettings.xml is generated in C¥programdata¥alteryx. Users cannot replace RuntimeSettings.xml to other folders.
It would be nice if a feature that users can specify place to save RuntimeSettings.xml.
Or, it would be nice if this specification is put in the documentation.
When a user adds a canvas to the gallery - we need to be able to ask for a set of mandatory attributes on every canvas which are tied to meta-data.
So - in our world, these would be:
- Which business line does this belong to (pick from a list)
- What business process does this belong to (multi-select from a tree)
- Which part of the organization does this belong to (multi-select from an org tree).
- Who is the canvas owner as a developer; and as a Line-of-business owner (there are two different versions of the word "Owner" to us)
Every canvas that's booked into the gallery needs to have these fields added to the canvas so that we can inform the right person if a canvas fails, understand which part of our business is impacted, look at velocity & density analytics; etc.
This then requires a few pieces to be set up on the server up-front:
- Define your meta-data elements (tree; drop-down list; etc). Admin will need to set this up in the beginning
- Define which meta-data elements are mandatory; and which are optional for every canvas.
- When these meta-data structures change - there needs to be a process that forces the owners to update them again. For example if we change our org structure, that will invalidate some of the meta-data tagging on assets.
- If a user leaves the firm, owner information needs to be forced to be updated
Happy to talk this one through - for any large corporate env, tagging assets like this is super-critical, and this would need to be flexible because every org has a different set of tagging needs.
cc: @Deeksha @avinashbonu @revathi
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
6 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 |