Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
When replacing an app in the gallery, it appears that you always see the original upload date (which is good to have), and then simply a version number. It would be great if you could add an additoinal field that shows the most recent replace date. That way you would know that "SampleApp v4" is the 4th replacment, and that 4th replacement happened on date mm/dd/yyyy. Also, while it's replacing, there is no indication that it is doing the replace. An hour glass or some indicator telling you to sit tight would be nice.
Be able to subscribe to a concrete App in the Gallery so you can receive an email or notification when an App is updated. Several times I have been using an App that suddenly stops working properly because there's a new version available, but actually there's no way to be aware of this unless you check the date of the last version updated.
It will be ideal if you could subscribe to the app to receive new updates notifications or if Alteryx Designer could give automatically notifications of updates in the Gallery of Apps you have installed.
Hello,
When trying to move and order the districts, it gives the impression that you can organize them in a particular order..
But what comes out on the Gallery side remains in Alphabetical order..
Can this bug be fixed please
Hello Alteryx Team,
we would like to customize SAML login with additional claims (departement)?
We want to grant authentication based on claims we are using in addition of firstname, lastname, email.
So we need custom code as well, is this possible to integrate or merge with alteryx code ?
simple example would be:
we add city to the claims and on user with from city "New York" will be accepted all others will get access denied page.
Best regards,
Heinrich
The Inputs to an Alteryx App look very clunky and are not formatted well on the Gallery. The App Inputs look fairly decent when executed from Designer, but the Gallery input tabs looks like a work-in-progress that never got out of beta. We desperately need some way to make the app input tabs aesthetically pleasing and functional. An "artisan" does not like to create a masterpiece app that has a Model-T front end.
Gallery Scheduler can schedule the workflows recurring,custom and once.
Idea 1 : Incase the scheduled run fails it would be good to have an retry option incase the source file path has network latency or network glitch.
Idea 2 : It would also be good if the scheduler checks if the latest feed or file is present in the source file path and have an option to kick off to run job the moment the latest file is present.
Idea 3 : For workflow to run on start and end of the working day month date we currently do not have an option in scheduler. we have an option to choose the first day and last day but the first and last working days in a month.
Idea 4 : When we choose the replace workflow option that changes the version of the workflow on gallery the schedule automatically is disabled. We will have to manually enable the schedule and also re-enter the credentials which is difficult if we keep updating our workflows every time with new changes as per business needs. request to have the schedule option enabled incase the replace workflow is done and also not to erase the workflow credentials.
We are constantly moving workflows from our Dev environment up to Prod and then back down again to improve them. Even though we only used Gallery shared data connections, and both environments have the same name for each connection; the connections still break when opening the workflow in the other environment. This is because designer actually uses an ID code behind the string name instead of the name. And, even though connections exist by the same name in each environment, the code behind them is different.
I would like a way to be able to specify the data connection code so that I can make the code the same in both environments.
We have a bunch of workflows in our public gallery that have no inputs, and so the results are the same no matter who runs them, it just depends on the time. It is a huge oversight and a massive waste of resources that a person can only see workflow results for the times that one user ran the workflow. If I have user A run a workflow at 10AM and user B doesn't know about it, he's going to run it at 10:05 AM and we just wasted valuable compute time and resources to produce the same exact data set.
Or, say it runs on a schedule, and you want people to access the results via gallery instead of saving as spreadsheet or something somewhere. But you can't. Only the person who setup the schedule can see the results.
Now, I can see that some workflow applications may produced different results based on inputs, and some results may be sensitive. But then at least make it a check box when publishing the workflow to gallery whether or not results should b shared globally.
When you create an App/Macro locally and give it a custom icon, that icon should follow the App/Macro when you load it into the Gallery.
Hi All,
The limit of data connections in Alteryx Gallery is 100 only.
Is it possible to increase the limit ?
Best Regards,
Samuel
Idea:
Using a few designers and registering to the Alteryx Gallery are good fits for micro and small enterprises, from investment vs capability stantd point.
Alteryx Server is suitable for medium to large enterprises with at least 45K USD budget yearly and many alteryx users possibly more than 20...
Don't you think there is a need for something in between? I propose Alteryx mini-server (well we can find a better name hopefully :)
Rationale:
Many Alteryx clients seem to utilize Alteryx designer for ETL,
then some of them further enrich data and model forecasting or predictive modelling.
Before even considering a server they output to a BI server like
If there is a need for automation Alteryx designer + Scheduler does all the trick needed.
Once you update everything in a repetitive fachion 100s to 1000s of Qlik or Tableau users can reach to the most uptodate content and discover dashboards...
I believe we can do a similar thing with a mini server...
What to do:
Option to update ownership to any other valid license holder as needed.
Use Case: Currently the canvas owner is marked by default as the user publishing the canvas to production.
However, we have seen instances where the person moves teams and would like to hand it over to another person.
We've purchased a server license and several designer licenses to publish analytics apps to customers via our internal/company gallery. Whether a user signs in or not, users should not be subjected to corporate Alteryx ads. This is a terrible user experience and detracts from our ability to deploy self-serve solutions.
Hi,
I have an existing app in my company's gallery. I updated the app in the gallery to not allow others to download. I just made changes to the desktop version of the app and saved it to the gallery, then went thru the steps of replacing my existing gallery app with the new version (this part I like). BUT, after updating the app, when I went back into the app settings, the option for others to download was checked again. To me, the app should inherit anything that was manually done to it in the gallery, like making it not downloadable. Is it possible to have this changed in a future release?
Thanks!
Aliases are a really powerful tool, particularly when you have multiple environments (EG Test, Prod) and need a published workflow to work without any code changes (In particular in an IT or Release/Change Control model). By configuring a system alias on your Test and Prod servers, code will dynamically point to the correct server.
However, aliases can be somewhat cumbersome if you have a lot of databases on a server, and those database names change by environment. Effectively, you end up needing an alias for each Database, which runs into naming convention and standardization issues.
Having the ability to configure a "database value" or a "database alias" would do a lot to help this. This could either be a file that would be attached (allowing for easy config changes without risk of modifying the underlying code structure) or a secondary tier of aliases, so that a connection string might go from:
aka:SQLSERVER (contains sqlserver and database information)
to:
aka:SQLSERVER||aka:database - so that at runtime Alteryx would evaluate the SQLSERVER alias and the database alias to create the correct connection string for that environment.
It would be GREAT if we could have an optional notes field in the gallery. When many tools are uploaded to a collection, the titles alone are not descriptive enough for end users. I have to publish a separate "menu" for reports that are available in the gallery. In some cases I have to number them. I wish users could just browse for themselves to find the application that is suitable for their use case.
I think it would be good to arranged the Workflow results into tabbed pages by completion status, e.g. a tab for failures, warnings, success, all. We run about 200 jobs in the morning and have to page through all the workflow results to find failures.
Also would be useful to search workflow results by completion status, e.g. find all workflows that have failed.
The search for replacing a workflow is poor (and I get that it is probably challenging to write on the back end) but as a result even if I type in the exact title of the workflow (aka copy and paste) Alteryx replace can't find it. Not only does this mean I have multiple workflows with the same name running around (loads of fun with lack of version control) but it also makes this entire thing more frustrating every time I update a workflow (as normally this also means the scheduling of said workflow breaks).
It would be awesome if instead of having to search by title for your workflow that you wish to replace with if you could instead use the URL where Alteryx Gallery put the workflow and then there wouldn't be any confusions about which workflow and you wouldn't have to type.