Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
The more I'm digging into the Private Gallery (on our own Server, not gallery.alteryx.com), the more I'm feeling that the UI and functionality is very non-user-friendly.
I would like to do something that I think is very basic (I am the Admin of the Gallery):
1. Create Apps and put them in various Collections.
2. Grant people access to certain Collections.
3. Have those people, when they log in, only see the Collections to which they have access to (that I granted them). And then run the apps in those collections. Nothing more, regardless of who they are.
4. Given all three of the above, but I do not want to see them listed as an Artisan, nor do I want to see them have their own studio
Currenlty, no matter what I do, they have Studios, and some are listed as Artisans (and as mentioned in a prior post, you can't delete their Studios). I've tried using Windows Authentication, but I get errors so that's not an option. It would be nice if the above were options regardless of the Authentication type.
It would be great if the admin could change some default settings on the Alteryx Gallery page. For example, where we have the list of apps, show Detail view and sort by App name ascending by default.
When a process is running in foreground, the GUI does an excellent job of giving feedback to the user as to which "step" the job is running and how much data is processing through the active tools. When that same job is scheduled, the amount of information is limited to when the job began execution.
If a tool was able to give checkpoint status out to the user, we could better monitor the progress of scheduled jobs. The visibility to the job is most important for long running jobs. We've unfortunately had instances where we have had to cancel jobs and to restart them not knowing how close or how far from finishing they were.
Thanks for your consideration,
Mark
Analytics Gallery needs the ability to save my question choices - so I don't need to re enter them every time I run the app.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
6 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 |