Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
The search for replacing a workflow is poor (and I get that it is probably challenging to write on the back end) but as a result even if I type in the exact title of the workflow (aka copy and paste) Alteryx replace can't find it. Not only does this mean I have multiple workflows with the same name running around (loads of fun with lack of version control) but it also makes this entire thing more frustrating every time I update a workflow (as normally this also means the scheduling of said workflow breaks).
It would be awesome if instead of having to search by title for your workflow that you wish to replace with if you could instead use the URL where Alteryx Gallery put the workflow and then there wouldn't be any confusions about which workflow and you wouldn't have to type.
Hi,
I have missing this functionality in alteryx gallery where we can see the runtime status of running app.
In Workflow result option we can view only post completion of app run.
Is Alteryx looking at implementing some kind of feature to provide a preview of impacted objects (lineage view) & understand dataconnections' changes impact before it's implemented ?
Benefits:
DOMO has this well done in their platform, check it out rather than me explaining here..
Search for Data Lineage & Impact Analysis.
Right now we can set the limit of processes a worker can run and each worker will ping the controller when a slot is available so that it can assign a new process. However, this is not efficient and you can truly load balance because you don't know how busy that worker acutally is...
We need a way that might be simliar to how we do on DataStage GRID environment where the LSF platform balances that workload across the entire GRID.
Java Version upgrade requires LLS settings to be changed manually and LLS service to be restarted.
so every time there is a java version upgrade, users have to be notified of the downtime (even though they could move into 7 day grace period) and then the flexnetls.settings file has to be updated with Java home path.
Local License Server settings has to pick up the latest Java installation and not require manual Config change and service restart.
Installation/upgrade of java in all servers are usually firmwide Tech team activity - which are outside of Server admins control.
Java support by Alteryx - is version 8.0.212 - while the latest version available in our premise is 8.0.241. support for latest version of java - which is required for functioning of Local License Server should be prioritized.
@Kosi @SeanAdams @ydmuley @RajK @LizaNemchynova @Arianna_Fuller @MPistone
We're looking to use the worker setting that cancels jobs that run over a certain amount of time. However, In testing we noticed when the server kills the job it does not trigger the workflow event for 'after run with errors'. That said, it does trigger the 'after run without errors' event, but there is no detail in the email as to what happened. This behavior seems counter-intuitive. We primarily use 'after run with errors', so our users could potentially have their workflows cancelled and never hear about it.
is it possible to do one of the following:
We're currently running server 2019.1, so please ignore this idea if this issue has been resolved in later releases.
Here is the server setting I am referring to
Have the Alteryx Server send a notification when the license is within a configurable amount of days to being expired via SMTP
I wish Alteryx had an Alteryx gallery not only for workflows but for pure data sources as well which we can access with;
And I would like to be able to get weather data as a starter;
But especially the most needed aspects are;
Obviously 5 day 3 hour forecasts for all these aspects are another thing and probably this will generate some revenue...
This information is so essential in order to accurately forecast
Mathematica (since version 7) and wolfram has this built in already!
https://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/newin7/content/CurrentAndHistoricalWeatherData/
http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/symbol.html?symbol=WeatherData
This is the source of data; http://reference.wolfram.com/language/note/WeatherDataSourceInformation.html
Totally agree that maintaining a data source covering worldwide is not an easy task but I think will help Alteryx users and customers a lot...
Hi
My idea is to facilitate scheduling through Gallery vs the separate scheduler built into Designer. The reasons for this:
Thanks,
Ryan
Hello,
I need to monitor which applications are shared with who on regular basis. We follow the 19.2 subscription model to share applications.
Can you extend server usage reports to include such data?
Best,
Piotr Zawistowski
Idea:
To create an IoT district for the Alteryx Gallery...
Rationale:
Many vendors are now focusing on the IoT wave,
having some examples on IoT use cases would be a nice resource for many...
Best
In Gallery 10, List Boxes (that are within a Radio Button) have their contents sorted horizontally. Previously (Gallery 9.5) the contents of List Boxes was sorted vertically. This new orientation makes it very difficult to find specific items within the list. The problem is particularly severe for long lists, when it becomes common for the check box and associated text to become separated on two different lines.
The admin (aka curator) needs to be given more control. The admin should have greater control than the users of the system.
My organization is in the Healthcare industry and we have HIPAA laws to abide by when it comes to data. Not all users should be able to see all data. Developers should not have complete control over the data they publish.
Private studio
Collections
Get tips from Tableau as they have admin controls down with their permissions process.
Hello,
Currently we are working on an issue where we are seeing an "inbound pipe" error during a scheduled workflow, terminating at the error.
However, the workflow doesn't officially complete; it simply terminates.
For the majority of workflows, when a workflow runs with errors, completing with errors, even if the workflow was unsuccessful, you can send an email via the events for that workflow, if the workflow completes with errors, to use as an alert or trigger, etc...
However this doesn't work when a workflow suddenly terminates with errors.
I'd like to see functionality added to all ow for an email event when a workflow terminates unexpectedly, without completing.
This way, I could set up a job to re-trigger the workflow if this happens.
This can occur when memory is swamped during the initial workflow.
This functionality would be a huge positive.
Thanks
I would love the ability to select multiple workflows at once to disable/edit/move workflows to a different studio or disable the schedule all at once (so like a check box to select them)- instead of having to manually select each one and move them and have to go back and forth.
This would also help during update time- as the longest part of the updates is waiting for the service to stop. If i could select all/multiple schedules to disable at once- then the service would be able to stop when I chose (instead of waiting for scheduled workflows to run)
When installing and configuring Alteryx, the wizard allows the administrator to select the Gallery authentication to be used among:
Built-in
Integrated Windows authentication
Integrated Windows authentication with Kerberos
SAML authentication
The note states:
Once an authentication type has been selected, it should not be changed. Changing it may cause technical problems.
The gallery manual states "Once an authentication type has been selected it should not be changed or Gallery functionality may be compromised."
If you are reading this idea suggestion, I hope it is not too late for you. Why allow the user to change the authentication method once the install is completed? What are the options to solve this?
One option would be to grey-out the "Authentication Type" section in the "Gallery Authentication" screen, so the user is not able to change authentication methods once after the first configuration is set. This would still allow the user to change SAML settings.
Another option, if somehow there is a reason why a user would want to change authentication types even though it is not supported, what about changing the layout to make it more difficult to change the authentication type.
What are your other suggested changes?
This is not relevant if this idea is implemented https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Ideas/Allow-changing-of-Gallery-Authentication-witho...
However, I would imagine that a UI change would be a lot easier to implement that supporting overhauling the user management in the MongoDB.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
3 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |