Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
Can we have search option enabled in Gallery Admin > Jobs to filter on running jobs to specific ones or to check specific job schedules.
In Gallery, I'd like to see the execution log in the workflow results, i.e. what you get if you run the workflow from Designer. I'd like to see this whatever the status of the workflow completion. Would be useful to assess warnings and the performance of components within the workflow. Also would give me useful stats about records loaded etc.
I would like the ability to add a workflow description on Alteryx server. This step would be done after the workflow is published, this way future edits can be made without having to republish the workflow. A checkbox to allow HTML content would also be appreciated.
When looking at a Workflow in the Gallery there is no way to tell if it currently resides in a collection. As a suggestion, a good place to have this information would be in the header block of a workflow where the version information and number of times a workflow was run is stored.
Alteryx has its own version control built in - however in large Enterprise environments there is a requirement to be able to use the version control platform that already exists.
In other words - when you install the server - you are asked:
Do you want to use Alteryx for version control, or your own SVN; GIT or a 4th custom option based on API integration (i.e. build this yourself based on a defined API).
This is very important to ensure that enterprise assets are maintained under the regimen of control that our Infosec & Auditors need, and the investment in making sure that Version Control contains all the right discipline; governance; etc - is all done in the enterprise Version Control platform.
Can we please extend Alteryx to have this flexibility so that we can cater to large Enterprise customers, and also anyone else who has a strict governance & change control requirement with existing infrastructure already in place?
If this is built as an independant layer and separated out from the core server slightly - it will be possibly to flexibly add other VC systems later (or provide companies with the ability to build their own).
Thank you
Sean
In stead of having to create an event to notify me when workflows are failing, I would like to easily enable that option from gallery after scheduling a workflow.
This idea is to allow users to configure the file view option for a workflow running in the gallery that produces file outputs. Today, there are two views that a user can toggle between (see attachment), but I don't believe there's a way to change the default view. This idea is to change the setting as either a global gallery setting, on a workflow-by-workflow basis, or both.
We have end users that miss the drop down menu (and the file count next to the drop down, and the label we've added in the analytic app that says there will be two output files, and...), so they sometimes miss the second file entirely. Setting the default view to the "list view" rather than the drop down view could help alleviate that pain.
Note: The screenshots in the attachment show two Excel files that could be combined into one file with multiple tabs. This is a pain point for other workflows, as well, that produce outputs in multiple file formats.
Alteryx Server Security is So Complex and it's not easy to understand, Our IT/ Information Security feel that the security is not up to the standard and it's confusing. Also as an Alteryx Gallery Administrator, it's not easy to add users or delete users, Manage Groups and Studios.
The Security structure for any tool is like User-->group--Capability/Functionality.
All we are requesting is keep up to enterprise standards.
Hi,
We have more clients that would like to prioritize their scheduled jobs based on run time and importance.
It could be a simple priority number, that decides which job that need to run next. Further it could be nice to be able to allocate certain workers to certain jobs.
I am looking forward to your feedback.
Daniel
It would be great if the admin could change some default settings on the Alteryx Gallery page. For example, where we have the list of apps, show Detail view and sort by App name ascending by default.
Everyone on our team would benefit from having access to each other's workflows -- including workflow results and scheduling -- but publishing them to gallery where any user in the company can run it/ download it would present a security issue. Functionality that is not met with Collections. I found a similar idea, but not anything that encompasses the whole thing.
It would be of immense value to have a Team Gallery - something intermediate to the company gallery and the private collection. This would enable our team to have access to modify, publish, schedule workflows as a team.
Currently when I log into the Gallery, I can see all of the users who are using license keys assigned to me. I would love to be able to run some reports on usage and activation date as well as export the list of users to excel/csv.
-Dan
The more I'm digging into the Private Gallery (on our own Server, not gallery.alteryx.com), the more I'm feeling that the UI and functionality is very non-user-friendly.
I would like to do something that I think is very basic (I am the Admin of the Gallery):
1. Create Apps and put them in various Collections.
2. Grant people access to certain Collections.
3. Have those people, when they log in, only see the Collections to which they have access to (that I granted them). And then run the apps in those collections. Nothing more, regardless of who they are.
4. Given all three of the above, but I do not want to see them listed as an Artisan, nor do I want to see them have their own studio
Currenlty, no matter what I do, they have Studios, and some are listed as Artisans (and as mentioned in a prior post, you can't delete their Studios). I've tried using Windows Authentication, but I get errors so that's not an option. It would be nice if the above were options regardless of the Authentication type.
It would be great to have an option to show intermediate output in gallery and allow user to modify that intermediate output before running the next step in a chained app environment.
This will come really handy in cleaning messy data which requires some manual input and user can complete their work form single gallery screen.
Currently the only way to achieve it is to build separate workflows/apps where first you have to download the messy data on your local drive and then upload it back via a separate workflow to complete the task.
The default view at gallery home page time will not support long titles for your workflows. I have several that get cut off with . . . . . and you need to hover over in order to get the full title. You can select a list view, which helps, and gives you more metadata, but you have no mechanism to save your table / list view as a default. Administrators should have the option to define a default view (tabular / list) and have it default that way for everyone who gets there, authenticated or not.
If you goto a private studio, you get the list view option. If you go to a collection, you get the list view option. If you goto a district, you don't get a list / table option set, just table set. Why?
There does not seem to be a way to set a (list of) favorite(s), even as an administrator. There should be a quick-hit button option to get you there, add it to a favorites collection, something. It seems like we went a long way to generate three different builds of ways to organize workflows, but left out the one that is most universal in similar tools. 'My favorites'.
The search criteria for adding a workflow to a collection *mandates* that you have a space, but doesn't tell you that is why you are not getting any hits; i.e., 'Water' and 'Water ' will give you 'no results found', or anything with water in the title respectively. Ugh.
Alteryx has the power (no pun intended), and Power BI has the visualizations.
But, why use two interfaces when you could use one?
A concept we started kicking around was embedding a PowerBI.com visualization into the Alteryx Gallery.
In theory this should work, but we're interested to hear if anyone else has tried it or has a best practice for embedding links into Gallery reports.
It should be possible to take the dashboard link:
Then, drop that into a text input tool to have it embedded in the output.
The idea is that certain dashboards would be linked to certain report results to allow an end user to drill into the output of the Gallery report specific to each result output, thus creating an interactive drill down in one interface.
Thoughts? Ideas?
When sending an app to the Gallery, in the Asset Management window, it would be nice to have a "check all" and "check none" box.
When you enable SAML authentication for Alteryx Server it does allow Single Sign IN but it does not support Sign OUT. This means that after you close your browser the session remains active. If the browser is opened again and the Gallery page is loaded it will pick up the session that was activated before instead of creating a new session. At the very least a session time out limit should be added.
Not sure if this has already been suggested but I couldn't find it in the ideas...
It would be awesome if in the Gallery some better documentation could be created for the naming of the different private studios, collections, and districts. The naming causes some confusion because it is so different than most other products which causes confusion in our company.
Hi,
Currently for most of our workflows we are using our private Alteryx Server to run workflows, using executables that call alteryxenginecmd and output logs to dynamically created log files. However, there is currently no way to leverage a custom log location for a workflow that is run directly from the Alteryx Gallery (apart from sending an email, which has scalability problems).
I would like an option to create the output log as part of a workflow, so that when we save that workflow to the Gallery, it can output a log with a dynamic name easily.