Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
Mongocontroller.log during its MongoDB dump processing records DB admin password in clear text. This poses a security risk now only to the company but to the MongoDB itself.
Is there a security patch ready to be pushed out to eliminate this risk?
Hey Sever Gurus -
There might times where it would really nice to have a group of workflows that were logically related that you wanted to run without having to invoke a 'run now' for each workflow individually. Sure, you could technically get there with the Runner macro, but in my case, there are intermittent scenarios in which I'd like to be able to run a set of related workflows to kick the tires, but they run at different schedule frequencies during normal operations. As it stands now, I have to go hunt through 39239 different workflows, find the 12 associated with project X and tell it to blast away individually. This brings me a great sadness.
So what I'd like to be able to have is some flavor of named / logical grouping I could attach to a workflow at upload to scheduling time, I could then tell the scheduler to show me / run everything attached to that grouping.
Thanks!
brian
For a multi tenant Gallery environment it would be great if one could define a dedicated stylesheet / "them" per tenant. Currently, the Gallery allows for only one theme as to be defined in the general admin section of the gallery.
The idea is that we could grab a workflow that had been placed in the scheduler db and then if the workflow is lost as a file then it could be reclaimed from the scheduler db
Enhance the USER tab in Gallery for showing the active user status, last login time
Easy to filter out the active user
Allow Admin to kill user session
Currently any workflows/apps published to the gallery can be found via the search function - even when the particular user has no permission to this workflow/app. While this only allows for the non-permisssioned user to see the title, this could still leak information as it allows anyone to find apps published in someone's private gallery.
Both the Alteryx Public Gallery and the Private Gallery product are impacted by this. Additionally this is not just limited to logged in users, but also public viewers of the gallery.
My proposed idea:
Best regards,
Ryan
This may be more from an admin standpoint but once I add workers into a cluster (controller token added), I have no way of knowing if the worker is now added to the cluster unless a workflow starts getting serviced and I view it from the 'View schedules' tab.
This causes issues specially when we have to add multiple of them and need to keep a track of which ones are added to the cluster or not.
On the admin page, I should be able to view the list of the workers that is currently existing on the cluster.
There should be a way to set limits on Gallery so users are not able to set up to many scheduled apps to run. Currently you can either allow all users to add as many scheduled jobs to the run or none at all. If one user sets up whatever number to run, keeps other users from running their jobs. Either allow Admins to set limits or have server shift jobs around so one user cannot lock a gallery to only run his/her jobs. A combination of both a set limit per user and better job management by gallery should also solve the problem.
I would like to see this option added to the interface of Designer rather than having a non-technical person edit XML to send usage statistics to Gallery/Server.
1. view by list instead of icon, can display more items per page
2. add sorting , like sort by created date, alphabetical order
3. improve the filtering , since there is a bug. The pagination result is wrongly displayed
I am the only Curator and my name is on the 2nd page by default when no filter applied.
When the filter applied, page one showed "There are no users that fit the search criteria" , but my name is showed on the 2nd page.
I would like to request a way to manage API connections. This would mean that API connection strings can be administered in the gallery the way data connections can be created, saved and assigned in gallery. This would help in large organizations, to administer API's within specific groups. This will also help the usage report
Add entered parameter into the result panel. It helps to debug process and audit.
sometime users save file in different way, and it not directly related to the interactive question
(e.g. Question: "SAP FBL5N Data" Input: "EXPORT (2).XLSX")
when error happen, I need the source file and the parameter.
if this idea is implemented, i just need the screenshot, which faster, without user to re-run the workflow to screenshot and share the parameter setup.
Hello,
Could you make it possible for curators to administer DCM connections created by other users?
Currently if one of the curators creates a connection, then only that person can modify it and give other people access to it.
Therefore if the person who created the connection isn't available then nobody can be given access to the connection.
Any curator can manage legacy gallery connections so to be able to move away from legacy connections and use DCM connections instead we need the same administration capabilities for DCM connections.
Thanks.
At my organization, we have many workflows on our server that take data from one database and store it on another. We would love the ability for an alert system that warns us when a job fails so that we can solve it immediately and not risk the chance of not noticing until a few weeks or months later.
Please could all log file paths on Server have the option to change their location, including
C:\ProgramData\Alteryx\ErrorLogs\AlteryxE2
To enable all log files to be written to an alternative drive than the installation.
The benefit it to prevent excessive space usage on the C: drive
Support have advised there is no way to alter the path or limit these log files by number or size.
Many thanks.
in version 2019.3, with artisan role, I able to add workflow to collection in the workflow page.
I not sure for later version, but in version 2021.4, only curator can do so.
If I uploaded a workflow, designer already give me a link to the workflow, hence if I can add the workflow to the collection.
it goes through 2 pages within 2mins (max). it is very fast for me.
but now, I have to go back to the homepage > collection > add workflow > wait eternal time for server to get the list of workflow > select it > click add.
it extra 5~ steps. with min 10mins extra time. and if the number of workflows larger and larger,
it has chance that it fails to load the list and have to wait another 10mins, and another and another endless 10mins.
so 2mins > endless 10mins? please add back this feature.
The dcm admin apis look promising. I would love if they could add put endpoints for sharing/execution and sharing/collaboration for admins. There is already a delete command for those two endpoints
I remember when i started using Alteryx and the gallery i was able to display the results of a workflow run and then copy a value from the screen to complete checks on.
Now when i run a workflow and the .yxdb results and displayed ever if its one record i have to download a file and open it just to copy the value.
Can we not get the screen to allow highlight and control c of text as required?
Hi Team,
The Alteryx API documentation for Audit was only available for certain entities(workflow, collection, etc.,) and not available for Schedule entities
If you create a schedule in Gallery, information about the schedule like creation date time, frequency, owner, type, last run, next run, etc. will be updated in MongoDB. If a user edits or modifies a schedule in the gallery, the edited/updated information is only available in MongoDB. There is no possibility of seeing audit information like old value(before change), new value, or operation (update, delete, insert).
We required the Audit information of the entire gallery operation such as schedule, Collection, Workflow creation, updation, and deletion.
Regards,
Ariharan Rengasamy
Hello,
Tableau has a nice Postman Collection available... it's really easy to use since you can download or forkt it on Postman and all you have to do is to write the variable values.
I would like the same thing but for Alteryx.
Best regards,
Simon
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 |