Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
We have a usecase where we want to check how often a workflow runs via the API so we can automate the consumption reporting we do internally. Right now the API only reads out workflows that were scheduled using said API. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Enabling it to also read out all the other workflows would really make this a powerful feature for us and I suspect others.
Upon utilizing the Alteryx gallery to create and test an automation app in cooperation with other business areas, we found that the list of "recent modified files" that appears when selecting a file browse query has several issues, or areas in desperate need of improvement:
Not only does this list append new files to the bottom, resulting in a less than desirable experience when selecting files from this list across multiple occasions when testing, but the list eventually reaches a capacity where no new files can be shown. Furthermore, for processes that involve small modifications being made to a file or group of files that is fairly consistent in naming, a list of ambiguously named files will quickly cause confusion. If this type of small improvement is possible, please reach out to me about any avenues towards achieving it, or if there is a person or department to appropriately contact.
-John
HI,
I could not find any possible way to send an email if the Alteryx workflow is taking more than expected time.
I was wondering if any such feature is available
In my organisation, Alteryx workflow keeps running sometime due to memory issues. It will be great to know about these delay and handle them.
Regards,
Vish
A maintenance mode would not be luxury, so that the worker does not take any more new job and finishes those which it has in progress. to be able to stop this one more easily.
In our private studios and in our home page we see our workflows in grid view by default and can toggle that to list view if we want.
BUT we can only see our collections and the workflows in them in list view.
Please can you add the ability to view our collections in grid view?
Currently, even if Alteryx Server is installed in E drive, RuntimeSettings.xml is generated in C¥programdata¥alteryx. Users cannot replace RuntimeSettings.xml to other folders.
It would be nice if a feature that users can specify place to save RuntimeSettings.xml.
Or, it would be nice if this specification is put in the documentation.
Password is required to execute any command on LLS. Last time we forgot the password, only way to retrieve it was to reinstall the LLS !
A command to reset password in LLS should do.
@Kosi @SeanAdams @ydmuley @RajK @LizaNemchynova @Arianna_Fuller @MPistone
While working with Alteryx Server, I noticed that there is no way for an Premium Artisan to organize the workflow results. With processes that are running hourly, each day, the workflow results gets very cluttered with the same things, and it takes some time to clean up. It would be nice to add a search bar that would filter out workflow results dependent on what you are entering in the textbar. Below is a very lo fi mock up. The spot where I entered "dispositionReport" at the top is the text bar that filters the workflow results below it. The red lines are simulating the removal of said records. Then offer a select all option to then delete all of the workflow results records.
The mongo db back is a working process but I would like to replace individual workflows and not the entire server state.
Currently , once a user have SetPriority access ,he can select from Low, Medium, High or Critical priority levels to ensure certain jobs always take priority over others.
This feature can be misused as users can upgrade their priority levels to jump up the queue and later downgrade the levels. It's difficult to justify and ask each others when you have 1000+ jobs running in a day and it makes administration tough and gives unbiased Gallery to all end users.
It would be nice to have on Admin console, global option to set max priority level so that no user can jump up level beyond this.
Hi Alteryx,
Now, under the Job Tab, it is only show the status of running job.
Suggest to add one new page for showing the run history of each workflow/job.
1. Workflow name
2. Priority
3. Assigned Worker
4. Start time
5. End time
6. Duration
7. State
8. Job Type (schedule or manual tracker)
9. Owner
10. Message ( e.g. error log)
Best regards,
Samuel
Hi Alteryx,
The scale of the column width in Alteryx Gallery is fixed.
Sometime may not show the whole word of that column, it is very inconvenience.
Actually, not only in gallery but also in designer. Like the Manage Data Connections pop-up window.
Even in 2019.4, the display problem hasn't been improved.
Can Alteryx improve the UI of gallery and designer asap?
Best Regards,
Samuel To
All of the default values for the RuntimeSettings.xml can be found in the C:\Program Files\Alteryx\bin\RuntimeData\RuntimeSettings.xml.
These values are overridden by the RuntimeSettings.xml file in the ProgramData folder. Unfortunately, there is no “formal” documentation right now.
The suggestion would be to show users the universe of XML tags and their corresponding accepted value configs, and other data related to the XML entity.
Element Name ServiceProviderEntityID -> child of Authentication -> grandchild of SystemSettings
Field | Description |
Definition | This is the URL of the Alteryx Gallery authentication service provider. |
Required | Yes |
Allowed Value Data Type | String |
Allow Multiple Values | No |
XML Example | <ServiceProviderEntityID>https://gallery.alteryx.com/aas</ServiceProviderEntityID></ServiceProviderEntityID> |
Hey Alteryx,
I'm liking the new ability to change the permission for users to schedule, prioritize and assign their work.
I would also like the Permissions to not show if I've turned it off. For most users this feature will not be available and showing a feature they won't be able to use will cause more problems then answers.
Just like in the notification tab, I would like the features that are off not show up in the end users profile tab
It would also be nice if we could assign this to a workflow and not just a person. A more likely scenario is that an App that needs a user input shouldn't be scheduled since it won't work.
To have the ability to turn off the scheduling for just that workflow is more likely then to turn off that feature for an entire person.
Thank you
The WebDAV protocol isn't supported by the Alteryx Scheduler, due to the security constraints associated with connecting to SharePoint. This is a server side limitation that should be aligned with the ability of the desktop to preform the WebDAV action.
As Alteryx Admin, we want to understand what our users are doing in their workflows as much as possible to ensure best user experience. In order to do this we would like to scan through User workflow XML in order to breakdown everything going on. We understand that their are many posts on workflows already doing a lot of this but:
Our Ask: is to release XML DTD or similar documentation that can help us breakdown workflows at individual tool levels (as well as differences between tool versions)
This would allow us to further build out solutions to admin visibility of user workflows.
I wish Alteryx would allow more control over user access to scheduling workflows. Currently there is only a radio button that globally allows users to access the scheduler. I wish we had another layer where we could limit access by Permissions. For example, we would like all Artisans and Curators to have access to the scheduler, but not viewers.
Rather than schedule to put things on the 5th day or the 14th day of a month, we often want to schedule our flows to run on the 5th business day or the 14th business day. I know that the term 'business day' means different things in different parts of the world, but I think it would be a feature that many reporting-oriented departments would enjoy. Let people specify a formula or have a table to go off of for their definition of 'business day' and it should be easy to implement.
I would add a <scheduler> label to this but there isn't one.
The Admin Gallery api needs to have the ability to get questions,execute jobs, get outputs. Currently I can only get questions, execute jobs and get outputs of my private gallery flows, I need to be able to do this for other Artisan flows without having to have their key/secret.
When I added data connection on Alteryx Server, there are many unsorted databases. If it is sorted, it is easy to find.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
3 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |