Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
The current Enterprise Utility Workflow does not have a match/look-up in place between the two environments for user ID's. Thus, the migration workflow doesn't work without adding in a couple extra API calls. When we upgrade to a new version of the utility, I have to add this back in.
It would be nice if the workflow would come with this already configured.
There are some products in the Market whic allows to install multiple services as Windows service on a single server.
In large organizations it is found that when we are running ALteryx Server in multi node setup at that time 1 worker server has only one Alteryx service installed and runs as single windows service. If we have configured FID with log on as a service FID in that case if one FID reached to its shared path mapping capacity 1018k then it stops authentication and windows service is not able to start.
If we have multiple services installed on the same server then we can configure like :
AlteryxService.exe : FID1
AlteryxService2.exe : FID2
AlteryxService3.exe : FID3
In this case we can utilize the server compute and enhance the multi tenancy instead of adding more additional server.
The gallery needs to implement basic auditing in the data connections.Currently, there is no way to determine who or when a data connection was created or updated.
The dataConnections Collection contains data connections with these keys
_id: (ObjectId) Document primary key.
ConectionString: (String) Hashed database connection string.
PasswordSecured: (String) Encrypted password for the database connection.
ConnectionName: (String) Data connection display name.
Subscriptions: (Array) Array of subscription IDs the data connection has been shared with.
Users: (Array) Array of user IDs the data connection has been shared with.
UserGroups: (Array) Array of group IDs the data connection has been shared with.
Add these keys to provide a basic audit trail
Modify the gallery to allow the values of the new keys to be displayed. Modify the API endpoint to retrieve this information.
When there is an app that has multiple tabs across the top but can extend down below the page, the user will scroll down to complete the boxes and click the 'Next' button at the bottom.
This takes the user to the next tab but remains at the bottom of the page.
It would be very useful for this 'Next' button to jump back to the top of the page.
You cannot currently upload a new workflow and specify your own workflow_id GUID. This would be useful for systematic workflows that need to be referenced in code. Currently, you either to search for a workflow by name, but you are not guaranteed it a workflow instance you uploaded. This would be helpful for server and workflow administration.
Given there are multiple api versions. I need a way to call the api and get the server version so I can make the correct API call or construct code logic which provides the user code requirement based on the versions features or limitations.
I propose a api call ../getserverinfo/ that returns server metadata like version, default worker thread count, and default memory allocation.
There is currently not a way to call the API and find out the calling user. For instance, if I have a user API key and secret, I to return the rest of the user info for the calling user or who is calling the api. I propose a api call like ../user/whoami
Hello! We just upgraded to 23.2, and I see in v3 an endpoint to start a job (v3/workflows/{id}/jobs) and then another to get that job's status (v3/jobs/{jobID}). Compared to v1, I think the outputs endpoint is missing (v1/jobs/{jobID}/output/{outputID}). I'd love for this to be added so we can upgrade from v1 to v3.
I want to let my artisans choose the collaboration option when sharing dcm sources. Currently they'd have to be promoted to curators to do this.
the idea would be to be able to chain Workflows (execute Workflow B at the end of Workflow A). Or to condition the execution of a Workflow in relation to another when there are dependencies.
Hi Team,
We used the 2021.3 version earlier, which included a user interface feature allowing for search by owner and a
few other filters. However, upon upgrading the server to the 2022.1 version, we discovered that this option was no longer present on the UI page. Moving forward, it is imperative that this functionality be reintroduced in future releases of Alteryx for better user experience.
Regards,
Ariharan Rengasamy
Alteryx server should support certificate authentication internally within the app (i.e. to the internal MongoDB) rather than password based authentication? this is not User Authentication for Gallery and workflows but the Alteryx Application itself and how it authenticates against the MongoDB. this would allow it to be installed in Very Secure environments that insist on stronger authentication methods.
Why not?
Alteryx designer has a 3 hour demo session on CloudShare but no Server, no Connect, no Promote!
Looking forward to try and test before you buy? Than give me a "like" please...