Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello all,
This may be a little controversial. As of today, when you buy an Alteryx Server, the basic package covers up to 4 cores :
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Server-Knowledge-Base/How-Alteryx-defines-cores-for-licensing-our-products/ta-p/158030
I have always known that. But these last years, the technology, the world has evolved. Especially the number of cores in a server. As an example, AMD Epyc CPU for server begin at 8 cores :
https://www.amd.com/en/processors/epyc-7002-series
So the idea is to update the number of cores in initial package for 8 or even 16 cores. It would :
-make Alteryx more competitive
-cost only very few money
-end some user frustration
Moreover, Alteryx Server Additional Capacity license should be 4 cores.
Best regards,
Simon
Currently Alteryx has a timeout setting at a worker level which applies to all of the workflows/schedules that run on that node.
It'd be great and very useful is that setting is made available at a granular level like at the Collection/User Group or workflow level.
I've been told by Alteryx support that this is not a feature that is currently available. Hence proposing an Idea on the community requesting for such an ability!
Currently, only users themselves are able to setup the default worker tag in their My Profile page. To ensure efficient management of worker nodes, Server Admins or Curators should be allowed to set the default worker tags of gallery users, preferably in bulk. This will help avoid workflows to be executed using the wrong worker node.
In the User record you can get the subscription ID, but it doesn't show the Subscription Name and doesn't provide a link to the subscription which would be helpful (and seems pretty simple to implement).
I know subscriptions are going away, but until they do please make working with what we have easier. Thanks!
In the Alteryx Gallery Collections the Workflow Upload Date doesn't sort properly. Instead of sorting chronologically (ex: Jan first Dec last) it sorts by number (Dec goes before April because Dec starts with a 1 while April starts with a 4), see attached for an example.
it flips back and forth between 2022 and 2021
In the example November and December are first because the month starts with a 1. Then April follows because it starts with a 4. Then it starts to get messy because it does this:
That 2022 is in the middle purely because 4 < 5, that's not right.
I tried exploring the settings to see if I could change this but I didn't find an option to do so.
Two potential solutions:
As collections get big sorting for the most recent workflow becomes a nightmare with the current improper sorting mechanism.
If I'm mistaken and this option already exists please let me know.
Thanks!
Chris
It would be nice to have workflow version information on the Workflow Results page for every running status.
The reason for that is after workflow was scheduled and then the published version has been changed, there is no way to follow versions.
There is a typo under the Help area for the Default Gallery Administrator (System Settings). It should be a backslash, not forward slash there. Correct is: domain\username
I think for business purposes it would be great to be able to update the apply for an exemption page that displays when you have a flow that is blocked in safe mode so you could provide accurate documentation to your users about their companies go through an approval process and allowing you to link out to external sites like JIRA to submit a ticket
The job timeout function is a perinate issue on the the Alteryx server because scheduling workflows on the server that overlap with another workflow can cause bottleneck issues. Depending on the number of workers and the other workflows, the workflow in question could fail to run or not complete running at the desired date and time. I recommend a view option of the Schedule Forecast feature for all users, so as to allow all users to effectively schedule workflows on the Alteryx server that do no conflict with other workflows.
2021.4 Server comes with a ton of new great features.
The one that shouldn't be implemented is moving away from Alteryx initial intentions of being a place of data artisans, and turning the Gallery into a Spreadsheet.
A homepage should feel like home. It should have the flexibility to customize it for each Organization to move workflows, pictures, and notes around to guide the user to the application they need to run their workflow.
Most people using the HomePage Gallery aren't major developers, but new users or even non-analysts who want to run an app to get the report they need.
Please don't go backward by taking away flexibility, readability, and increasing difficulty to understand and get to an app.
But give more freedom to Alteryx Admins to customize and make the user experience even better.
Lean more into these ideas where we can showcase and feature apps and show descriptions of tools
Just like your homepage we should be able to show videos and use negative spacing to help guide users, and be able to scroll down the page
Instead, you took away all spaces and tried to turn everything into raw data. There were spaces and extra lines on the app, but it's all stripped away on the Gallery in 2021.4
Again, lean into your roots of canvases where each artisan can design and put tools and items that make sense to them and their Organization.
Please add features... don't take them away
As an admin - would like to have the following features on the Gallery
1. add summary cards to TOP of user page that show same summary as diagnostics page
2. "export to excel" icon
3. ability to filter date
4. allow selection of ALL
5. allow me to default my settings choice so its always "all" - screen shot below
Currently we can only configure questions and flow priority when using the POST API to queue workflows.
Would be good to be able be able send some of the Runtime configurations as well.
This would allow for much more flexibility.
Example
{
"questions":
[
{"name":"Test_dt","value":"1/1/2020"}
,{"name":"Test_Num","value":"53"}
,{"name":"Test_txt","value":"schedule test"}
]
, "priority": ""
"disable browse":"True" // When running flows in production this would reduce resource usage as data will no longer be cached. Having it as a parameters would mean that we can ensure that it is disabled
,"disable output":"False"
}
Current Fields
Possible other fields
The full question tree is not visible within the JSON object returned when requesting the 'Questions' in the .yxwz file on the Alteryx Server. There are nested questions that are visible but there is no indication that they are nested, missing label groups, tabs and no indication whether a question should be shown or hidden. This is limiting.
A full question tree in the JSON would allow for dynamic interpretation of the 'Questions' in the .yxwz file as structured through the Interface Designer.
Regards,
Ben
It should be possible to schedule chained apps. Particularly useful when the first workflow in a chain runs a check and if the check returns true then the next workflows run and if the check returns false then the next workflow should not run.
Possibly related to:
Schedule Configured Analytic Apps - Alteryx Community
This is an issue that has been marked as solved, however it isn't.
The problem still persist. When you have a macro with a gallery data connection, the workflow containing the macro gives an error when run on the server: 'Unable to translate alias'
If you select manage assets, then include any macros when you publish, this bug is gone. That's the fix.
But this is not a solution because if someone updates the macro, the containing workflows will still use the old, included version of the macro. You will somehow need to remember which workflows use the modified macro, download them all, include the new version of the macro and republish the workflow.
Well, I can't see how this is a fix to the problem. It's probably better to just keep using the old disabled container 'fix', which is also quite painful.
When rerunning a failed manual job, the same Priority is used, but the Optional Job Name is not and cannot be re-entered on submit. User has to go to Workflow results page and Edit to add the Optional Job Name for a rerun.
I suggest the Optional Job Name text box be added to the rerun submit page.
Prefill using the original job's value if one exists.
Thanks,
MJ
When I manually execute a wf on Gallery, I sometimes have a tinge of regret that I don't have email events set for the workflow. In most cases, it's just THIS time that I want to receive an alert and not every time. At any point while the workflow is executing, allow the option to request an email event to be sent out for this execution.
As we look at upgrading Alteryx Server - one of the challenges is that it's an all-or-nothing approach; and there doesn't seem to be a guided wizard approach to upgrading.
The upgrade process would be much less intimidating if we could create a Migration tool which can work across versions - similar to Microsoft SQL Server which has the. This would allow us to:
- Migrate a subset of assets up or down versions
- Migrate across servers to do consolidation or to split loads into different servers for the purpose of segregation
- Progressively migrate over time to limit the risk.
cc: @JohnPelletier
I manage a server with 200 + Artisans. Some of them tend to abuse the Scheduler by having workflows running every hour or every x hours. This can penalize other users creating big queues thought the day. Currently I monitor the queue and schedule often and then contact these individuals to better accommodate their needs.
Having the possibility to disable hourly workflows, or enable to only specific users, would help a lot to deter the abusers.
Thanks,
Mauricio Estevez
It should be possible to trigger the same workflow in different ways from Alteryx Gallery:
- Workflow chaining:
- Workflow B runs after the successful execution of Workflow A
- Workflow B runs after the failure of Workflow A
- Schedule: Workflow B runs on multiple schedules
- API call (even when it is not an analytical app)
For example (considering the same workflow):
- Audit workflow runs every day
- Audit workflow runs every hour during the last day of the month
- Audit workflow runs if triggered by financial close on 3rd party tool
- Audit workflow runs after the execution of the financial workflow
Currently, in order to run an app via the API, you have to have uploaded the app to your private studio. Frankly, I don't find this function useful because you have to download then re-upload an app in order to gain access to the API. The API would be more useful if when an app is shared with you (or a collection is shared with you), then it would also allow for that app to be run via API by the user it was shared with. Right now, the only person who can run the app via API is the user who originally uploaded said app.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |