Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
If you have a complex SQL query with a number of dynamic substitutions (e.g. Update WHERE Clause, Replace a Specific String), it would be nice to be able to optionally ouput the SQL that is being executed. This would be particuarly useful for debugging.
I've been using Events a fair bit recently to run batches through cmd.exe and to call Alteryx modules.
Unfortunately, the default is that the events are named by when the action occurs and what is entered in the Command line.
When you've got multiple events, this can become a problem -- see below:
It would be great if there was the ability to assign custom names to each event.
It looks like I should be able do this by directly editing the YXMD -- there's a <Description> tag for each event -- but it doesn't seem to work.
I think it would be extremely helpful to have an in-DB Detour so that you could filter a user's information without having to pull it out of DB and then put it back in for more processing. A time where this would be useful is if you have a large dataset and don't want to pull the entire dataset out of the DB because it will take a long time to pull it. This would be applicable for filtering a large dataset by a specific state chosen by the user or possibly a region. The Detour in the developer tools actually seems like it would do the job necessary, it just needs to connect to the In-DB tools.
Hi alteryx can you please create a poll or an forms to fill or approval processes kind of tools . I know we have some analytics app tools but can we create something like google forms where we can easily create forms and get data outputs. Emails notifications for those forms and approvals .. etc ..
It would be awesome if I could re-display the users selections to them before I continue with the remainder of the workflow in an analytic app. That way, I could collect all of the UI inputs, do my validation on the values provided and then re-display the selections/options/text to the user so they can confirm that they are correct and they wish to continue, or they can stop the processing and make changes via the already-open UI without having to re-enter everything from scratch.
Then, when someone selects something that's potentially harmful or very time consuming, I can confirm their selections and alert them to potential issues.
Would love to see the Workflow - Configuration > Runtime > Record Limit for All Inputs option extended to Dynamic Input tools.
Hello gurus -
Pretty much every coding framework supports this. If we really want Alteryx to embrace no-code, we've got to have some ability to control commit / rollbacks across transactions. As it stands currently, it is pretty easy to write out parent records, fail to be able to write out children, and wind up with a database state that makes the end users very sad.
Thanks!
brian
When reading and writing large data frames to/from a python script in Alteryx it seems that there are limitations to the SQLite component of the tool. Given that this selection is recommended only when the user is having issues in the python tool why is the option selected by default? A colleague and I spent a couple of hours trying to work through an issue with importing a data frame larger than 1000x1000 and once we found this option (SQLite override) and unchecked it the data was written back to Alteryx without any problems.
Hint provided by the tool, "This changes the intermediate data format between Alteryx and Jupyter from yxdb to SQLite. Use only if running into issues. See help for more details."
Error message provided by the tool
After unchecking the option the workflow ran without any errors.
Recommendation: the python tool should default to SQLite override unchecked
Hi - think it would be great to have to open only one debug window, and where I add to my workflow, the debug automatically updates to include the new features of my workflow.
As it is now, I believe that I have to open a new Debug window where I have added new components to my workflow.
Hello All,
We are new to Alteryx and we could see that the Supported Data Sources from IBM are of below :
How about adding IBM Sterling to this?
We want Alteryx to support connection with IBM Sterling OMS which will help the Business requirements
Can anyone post some suggestions on this? How we can connect to Sterling?
Thanks,
Praveen C
Posting this idea after searching the community postings and then submitting a question to confirm:
I could invest the time into creating a macro to do what I need, or per @MichaelF suggestion a custom formula. However, the functionality already exists in the Blob Convert tool, so I'm suggesting that Alteryx provides that existing functionality to customers in a Formula.
I checked the Conversion formulas:
https://help.alteryx.com/2019.1/Reference/Functions.htm
And found other users talking about making a macro to do this:
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Discussions/Hex-to-ASCII-Conversion/m-p/344126
Could Alteryx add a new Conversion formula to convert a field to/from HEX/Base64 formats similar to the current Code Page conversion functions?
Thanks,
Cameron
how to share Custom Tool Palette (along with Macros) with other users.
For eg, I have created a custom tool palette named "Adhoc Analysis" with few macros; something like attached.
Now, how to make sure that all my user base can have same palette in their local alteryx designer.
After some research, I did found that I could share macros with them by putting all relevant macros on Alteryx Server, and users could then pick the macros from there.
Although, I wanted to suggest this as an Idea for future releases, it would be great to have an option or way, on how to share this with users in their local designer without much hassle.
Not sure, if this is something worth exploring from Alteryx development team side. But thought of suggesting to community if this could help others.
Thanks for your help.
Ravi Sharma
Please test/certify Teradata 16.2 for designer, server, scheduler, and Gallery applications.
When I maximize the SQL Editor Window within the Input Tool only half of the screen show the SQL window. The bottom half of the screen is useless grey space. Why not have most all of the screen be the SQL window and only a small portion of grey border for the Test Qry, Ok, Cancel and Help button? I'd like to see more SQL and less wasted space. Thanks!