Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
What if you had the option to connect tools without the lines going across the canvas?
This might be useful in cases where one connection is close but another is far away.
Of course, it would need to be easy to turn these on and off, and to jump from one end to the other.
The idea came up at a SoCal Alteryx users group this summer. Would other people like to see something like this?
For the purpose of debugging a workflow, I often filter just one customerID or any other ID to analyse the workflow.
With the Browse tool (ctrl-shift-B) you can just double click a cell and copy the value of it. This is not possible in the result tool, it would be nice if that would become possible.
Thanks,
Hans
An independent volume control would be helpful when testing workflows and you keep getting errors it can be annoying and distracting to neighbors if they keep hearing the error PING. You may need to keep your master volume up to be able to hear incoming emails, etc.
I want my Save Setting to stick on the Browse tool when I save output. I almost always save to Excel. The default is to save the output as an Alteryx .yxdb. That is useless unless I going to further slice and dice in Alteryx - which I'm not - which it why it being output to Excel to go to the end user. Once a file type is chosen - let that file type stick for future exports as most people save there output in the same file type each time. I find myself inadvertently saving .yxdb and then needing to resave in .xlsx.
When building out a large workflow, I'd say one of the bigger challenges I come across is being able to quickly navigate the canvas to a certain spot. In these types of workflows, my personal way of keeping things organized is creating sections of my workflow in different Tool Containers and naming them with a short description.
Here is what I picture helping out a great deal in navigation. Create a drowdown somewhere in the ribbon on top (would not want another sidebar or floating window that takes up needed space) that simply lists out every tool container in my workflow by name. When a tool container name is selected, the view jumps to that tool container in the window pane. Another option in terms of the interface might be to add a keyboard short that gives a popup "tool container search" window. Begin typing a tool container name, and it would jump to the first result it sees as a match. Then just hit escape or click outside the popup to continue your work.
I think this would help immensely in being able to jump to a particular spot in the workflow without having to drag the overview or scroll around until you are able to find it. I included mock-ups for each version I mentioned.
Hi,
Please provide users the option of downloading course videos and transcripts. If it is already there, please let me know.
Regards,
Meenakshi
We use several Files that are fairly large (canvas size). To traverse around to try and find where we last left off or to examine a specific X, Y at a specific zoom....one would need to either remember the tool number to search for or search for a keyword that returns several choices.
My suggested solution would be to create a bookmark(s). This would allow you to save a named bookmark that would save exactly where (X,Y) you are in the canvas and the Zoom level (Z). This way you could easily switch back and forth with in a canvas just back clicking the bookmark.
If anyone has ever used a CAD program that allowed the creation of 'Views' within the same diagram...this would be similar.
Thank you
As you may be aware localisation is the adapting of computer software to regional differences of a target market, Internationalization is the process of designing software so that it can potentially be adapted to various languages without engineering changes.
The idea is to make Alteryx designer tool, the web help content and example workflows to be multilingual (Possibly with the use of "lic" language files or similar) Hopefully the sotware and tutorials will all be localised by crowdsourcing initiatives within the Alteryx community.
I sincerely believe this will help the tool get a lot of traction not in US and UK but in other parts of the world,
Highly likely Mandarin and Spanish would be the first two language versions...
Top languages by population per Nationalencyklopedin 2007 (2010)Language Native speakers(millions) Fraction of worldpopulation (2007)
Mandarin | 935 (955) | 14.1% |
Spanish | 390 (405) | 5.85% |
English | 365 (360) | 5.52% |
Hindi | 295 (310)[2] | 4.46% |
Arabic | 280 (295) | 4.43% |
Portuguese | 205 (215) | 3.08% |
Bengali | 200 (205) | 3.05% |
Russian | 160 (155) | 2.42% |
Japanese | 125 (125) | 1.92% |
Punjabi | 95 (100) | 1.44% |
I haven't needed to do this for over a year, but I just tried in 2018.4 and the functionality is not there any more 😞
I'm trying to open an Excel file and customise the SQL used to read the data.
I've found this in other posts:
then I found this one 😞
Hopefully this feature will be re-instated soon 🙂
Would be great if we could right click on an input and in addition to having "convert to macro input" there was an option for "convert to dynamic input".
Please have the Calgary Tools put the file names in the annotation automatically like all other input/output tools.
One of those small little annoyances that can add some extra time to development is how when you browse for a file (either with the Input Tool or Output Tool) it always defaults to the most recent location of where you either picked up a file or output a file.
Many times I have existing Input Tools or Output Tools that I simply need to repoint (meaning they already have a file location mapped to either read or write to.) For these, it would be great if, when the user clicked to File Browse, the initial folder location displayed was the same folder where the current file is mapped to.
Perhaps displaying the most recent folder in the file browse interface may be best suited for when a file has not been mapped yet.
When I maximize the SQL Editor Window within the Input Tool only half of the screen show the SQL window. The bottom half of the screen is useless grey space. Why not have most all of the screen be the SQL window and only a small portion of grey border for the Test Qry, Ok, Cancel and Help button? I'd like to see more SQL and less wasted space. Thanks!
Hey Alteryx Devs -
Simple fix that would keep me in the flow sometimes, is if I could hit F2 and get to a place where I could tweaky tweaky the annotation. I keep on finding myself hitting F2 and then am annoyed that I have all these extra clicks to annotate meaningfully. Easy fix and you don't have anything else attached to F2.
Thanks!
brian
edit: Had wrench palette, needed pencil palette!
I'm using .sv file format for compressing large files and using them in Alteryx. .sv is call a Alteryx Spatial Zip file. This format seems to offer the highest level of compression of all the Alteryx file format types. Is this suitable for text also? Is it usable in real time vs uncompressing first then using in a workflow? If not, I think a compressed real time file format would be a nice addition.
Currently there are bulk loaders within alteryx for Teradata, Oracle and SQL Server.
It would be great to have a bulk loader for AWS Redshift in order to fully industrialize the workflow instead of using AWS S3 and then use a separate AWS Datapipeline for scheduling