Featured Ideas
Hello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
We've been researching snowflake and are eager to try this new cloud database tool but are holding off till Alteryx supports in-database tools for that environment. I know it's a fairly new service and there probably aren't tons of users, but it seems like a perfect fit since it's fully SQL complaint and is a truely native clouad, SAAS tool. It's built from scratch for AWS, and claims to be faster and cheaper.
Snowflake for data storage, Alteryx for loading and processing, Tableau for visualization - the perfect trio, no?
Has anyone had experience/feedback with snowflake? I know it supports ODBC so we could do basic connections with Alteryx, but the real key would obviously be enabling in-database functionality so we could take advantage of the computation power of the snowflake.
Anyway, I just wanted to mention the topic and find out if it's in the plans or not.
Thanks,
Daniel
It would be nice to have the option of reassigning the Tool ID's based on each tool's process order within the workflow.
It would be great if Alteryx allowed users to copy and paste data directly from excel into the workflow canvas as a text input. Sometimes I create quick mapping tables in excel that I do not want to save on my desktop or shared drive as it is a quick fix or solution. Tableau allows users to copy and paste data sets directly into a sheet for use. Can we make this happen??
Yours Truly,
Trevor
There are times where new versions of Alteryx come out, but there are situations where you cannot keep the Desktop and Server versions in sync.
As an example, at his time of the year, we are getting ready for year-end and al the workflows located on the server have been tested and signed off on. Now there is a new version of desktop with new features, but advise everyone to stay on the current version in case we need to make a fix. Typically, if we updated Designer desktop and try to publish the server -- you will get a versioning error.
I propose that when saving to the server, I can choose the compatible version and Designer/Server can let me know if there is any features I am using that will not work. If I don't use any features from a newer version, the workflow will publish.
So, let's say my server and Designer are at version 2022.1 and I decided to download version 2022.2. Typically, if I open and make any change with the new version -- I would get an error saving to the server - even if I am not using new features. However, what I am saying is that there is an option asking me what version I would like to save the workflow to the server as and I can choose 2022.1. Designer or server can check if I did or did not use any incompatible features, and if not, can save to the with the appropriate version.
Thanks,
Seth
Please add option to right-click a module tab to rename the yxmd file. This would be easy to do, for you, and quite handy.
I recently had an error in a module because an expected variable was not present coming into a formula tool. My variable, "MONDAY" was not present and the formula MONDAY/3 failed. The workaround was to union all days into the incoming data and things worked fine. I would have liked to have an Excel formula like this instead:
IF ISERROR([Monday]/3) THEN 0 ELSE [Monday]/3 ENDIF
Thanks
Hope this is fairly self-explanatory.
I'd like to be able to create presets for Summarize tool. Instead of having Group By, Sum, Count, Count Non Null, etc on top of the libraries of functions, put them into their own category. Users could then create a Favorites and the functions that they use the most would be stored in that section (editable by user).
Hi, when using the Join tool, I sometimes wish there are separate "*Unknown" fields for each of the left and right input.
I have occasions where the left input can be dynamic(modified upstream), but the right input fixed.
It's annoying to fix all join tool's selection when there are modifications in the upstream part.
It would be good to replicate some of the key workflow configuration settings as shortcut icons in the main shortcut toolbar.
For instance, I often use 'Disable all tools that write output' and need to toggle it on/off quickly when I'm testing a workflow. It takes too many clicks to deselect a tool, open workflow configuration, open the Runtime tab and select the checkbox. Many end-users I work with also don't even know the option is there because it is so well-hidden.
It would be much simpler and easier If I could toggle it straight from the shortcut bar. Having a keyboard shortcut to do it, like I do with ctrl-R (to run) would be even better.
Having shortcuts would also be good for:
- Disable all browse tools
- Show/Hide connection progress
- Open the Events window
In order to improve processing of HTML data (to use HTML data as a data-source) it would be valuable to convert HTML data to XML.
There's a few transformations that would be needed:
- special characters like &
- dealing with HTML's imprecision - for example - "img src" tags do not require an explicit close marker.
Example: <img src="/html/assets/alteryx_company_logo.svg?F0F845F3873A74E16B876DC33606AFEA" class="ryx-company-logo"> rather than
<img src="/html/assets/alteryx_company_logo.svg?F0F845F3873A74E16B876DC33606AFEA" class="ryx-company-logo" />
- dealing with multiple class tags on a single div
- footer tags which are balanced off against a </div> tag.
This would enable more efficient processing of HTML data using modern XML capabilities
Hi Team,
If you can please work on the idea of auto arranging the tools on Alteryx Designer. This would save a lot of tedious efforts, when we create a very big flow then it becomes very tough for us to arrange the tools properly and it becomes confusing sometimes.
Thanks
Some say to mato and some say to_mato, but how about: to/mato?
While working with my new friend, @Cedric we ran across a field in his data that contained a '/' character. We were building a macro where we updated the value of the field [AB/CD] with another field selected from the incoming data. Our error message was something akin to: Field AB was not found.
We worked around the issue, but what remained was the fact that certain characters are permitted in field names within some aspects of Alteryx and not in others. I don't know if you're aware of this limitation.
Cheers,
Mark
Hello
My problem: I've used the download-tool to download a 40mb XML. Parsing the DonwloadData-field containing this XML results in about 6600 records. The XML-Parse Tool passes the orginal DownloadData field to each record, resulting in quite a bit of memory usage:
XML-Parsing Problem
Suggestion: An option in the XML-parse Tool to not pass the parsed field in its output.
Marco
When running an app on your desktop, nested radio buttons work wonderfully. You can collapse groups and drill down to your heart's content. If you promote the app to the gallery, it doesn't work. I reported this as a bug to Client Services. Their response leads me to believe that they designed it this way. I'd like nested buttons to work both as a local app and as a gallery app.
Please star this idea if you agree...
Dear Mark,
This email has been sent to confirm that your technical support ticket has been closed. Please contact us if you need any further assistance.
Case #: 00095540
Case Subject: Radio buttons- different functionality between Gallery and local version
Your comment:
when using radio button to activate a sub set of questions that also use radio buttons then entire group has to be unselected then reselected to make additional change either activate/deactivate selectoins.
link to recorded webex that demonstrates issue: https://alteryx.webex.com/alteryx/lsr.php?RCID=740fd707be5e4654ba659f25713f8cdb
When you right click on a Macro tool (e.g. Google Analytics) within a workflow, you can choose the version of the tool to use. However, it does not indicate which version of the tool is already in use.
Why is this an issue for me?
I have a workflow with 15 instances of the Google Analytics tool. (I needed to use the API for each month fo GA data and then use a join. I built it this way due to the restriction on the number of records.)
So when I update the Google Analytics tool I have to do it 15 times. I'd like to be sure the update is needed before I start.
Alteryx Support confirm that there is no way to tell which version of the macro is in use.
Would love to have a 'common used' tab, rather than a favourties box (as that lags what I am currenty using).
Would be nice to have it look at my usage and create sort by frequency of use table. Could also be done with all users as well (some kind of opt-in telematary data?).
Similar to how there is a functionality to use pip through the ayxinstallPackages, there needs to be a way to upgrade python itself. There are important packages such as keras that have errors in Python 3.6 that are not present when used with 3.7 so it should really be up to the user as to which python package to use. Another solution could also be to allow the user to point to their own local installation of Python so that the user can maintain consistency between their own local site-packages and the one that Alteryx has.
In the output window, numbers should always be displayed right aligned by default. Also the font should be fixed width type so an 8 and 1 both take equal width and we dont see numbers as below.
11111111
88888888
1. It instantly tells the user that its data type is numeric without having to check metadata.
2. Readability of the values is greatly increased.
Pretty much only time I add Browse tools during development now is to get access to the Cell Viewer to examine values better.
Would love to be able to do this on the output window