Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Would love to have a 'common used' tab, rather than a favourties box (as that lags what I am currenty using).
Would be nice to have it look at my usage and create sort by frequency of use table. Could also be done with all users as well (some kind of opt-in telematary data?).
Hello!
I have recently come across something within Alteryx that caught me by surprise. Currently when you are within the configuration window of a tool (in this example, the browse tool) and use ctrl + backspace (shortcut for deleting a previous full word), a blank character is instead added.
Please see example:
Currently in the Browse tool configuration
Go to change the Name of the tool - and naturally to clear it, use ctrl + backspace:
[] is added to the end. From what i can gather, this is a 'control character' , used when an application does not support ctrl+backspace.
Ctrl + Delete however, is supported.
I am proposing for this character/functionality to be supported. I believe the configuration window is the main - and potentially only, i couldn't find any other examples - place this is not supported.
Hope this makes sense!
TheOC
Pretty much only time I add Browse tools during development now is to get access to the Cell Viewer to examine values better.
Would love to be able to do this on the output window
The ability to output to Amazon Workdocs via a special Output tool would be very helpful for anyone looking into using Workdocs for personal or professional purposes. This is similar in functionality to the OneDrive connector.
Hi Team,
If you can please work on the idea of auto arranging the tools on Alteryx Designer. This would save a lot of tedious efforts, when we create a very big flow then it becomes very tough for us to arrange the tools properly and it becomes confusing sometimes.
Thanks
When you right click on a Macro tool (e.g. Google Analytics) within a workflow, you can choose the version of the tool to use. However, it does not indicate which version of the tool is already in use.
Why is this an issue for me?
I have a workflow with 15 instances of the Google Analytics tool. (I needed to use the API for each month fo GA data and then use a join. I built it this way due to the restriction on the number of records.)
So when I update the Google Analytics tool I have to do it 15 times. I'd like to be sure the update is needed before I start.
Alteryx Support confirm that there is no way to tell which version of the macro is in use.
Hi, when using the Join tool, I sometimes wish there are separate "*Unknown" fields for each of the left and right input.
I have occasions where the left input can be dynamic(modified upstream), but the right input fixed.
It's annoying to fix all join tool's selection when there are modifications in the upstream part.
Hi - Please delete this if it perhaps exists already in a newer version. (I am on 2022.1 and don't see this functionality.)
I would love to see the ability to right click a tool that isn't in a container and be able to add it to an existing container. Currently I drag it over and drop it into the container then move it back to where it was. Inevitably I misalign the tools and spend time getting it linear again. It would be cool if based upon the choice made in the right click, it would bring the assigned container around the tool in its existing location.
OR
Perhaps within the config of the container you could choose tool #s to add to the container?
Anyways this isn't a huge need but it would be nice to see that additional functionality for people that spend a disproportionate amount of time aligning and distributing their tools HORIZONTALLY. (Nobody cares about the people that do vertical workflows.)
In a multi-person BI team; or where you have a multitude of different flows hitting similar data - it's easy to loose track of the right connections; the right data sets etc.
Could we please add to the Alteryx toolset, the ability to:
- Register a set of connections with readable names
- Register a set of data-sets which are community managed.
Connection Registration:
I frequently connect to 5 different datastores to bring together analytical results. Because Alteryx remembers the connections once-used I don't have to keep on building these connections from scratch, but these don't have a human-readable name; and they cannot be shared among the team to make workflow creation easier.
Suggestion:
Known Good Data Sets:
The other part of this is the community effect once a large number of people in the company start to get data-savvy. for e.g. One person has found a good way to query the actual timesheet data (username; project; hours) - and another person has found a good way to query the HR systems to get user demographic information (username; location; contracted working hours).
For enterprise customers - this would transform alteryx from a stand-alone tool where everyone is re-inventing the wheel every time - to a Data Platform where each additional piece of work done increases the net value of the full ecosystem in a virtuous cycle. It would also MASSIVELY accelerate every workflow build.
Happy to talk through this live with the Alteryx team if that's appropriate and helpful.
Thank you
Sean
Similar to how there is a functionality to use pip through the ayxinstallPackages, there needs to be a way to upgrade python itself. There are important packages such as keras that have errors in Python 3.6 that are not present when used with 3.7 so it should really be up to the user as to which python package to use. Another solution could also be to allow the user to point to their own local installation of Python so that the user can maintain consistency between their own local site-packages and the one that Alteryx has.
In the output window, numbers should always be displayed right aligned by default. Also the font should be fixed width type so an 8 and 1 both take equal width and we dont see numbers as below.
11111111
88888888
1. It instantly tells the user that its data type is numeric without having to check metadata.
2. Readability of the values is greatly increased.
I'm loving the ability to read from a zip file! However, I would love the ability to read all file types. For me, I don't see .accdb or .flat, and I assume other folks might be missing other file formats that they use. I find it confusing that the input tool accepts a lot of file types, but selecting the zip format then limits my choices. I believe @Aguisande mentioned this issue in the 10.5 beta.
Thanks!
When I'm working with a new data or tool set, I'd find it helpful to know which tools other analysts are using.
I'm envisioning an optional, dockable window where a list of tools (and possibly percentage/probability rank) exist to suggest the next tool most users add after the selected tool (or blank canvas).
For example, I open a new workflow and the window shows the following suggestions of tools:
Next, I add a File Input. While the File Input tool is selected, the list updates to show the most utilized tool after a File Input:
If I click back onto the blank canvas though, the suggestion window reverts to:
Ideally, there would be the option of the Community stats and/or your local server/enterprise stats.
Currently the Save Field Configuration, when used with fields in a different order does not give any indication that the ordering will not be saved and reused. It is possible people may use this option without realising.
This should be in the help at a minimum, perhaps in a warning box when used too, but ideally the renames and types should be applied to the columns they came from by Name - not just based on the order of the fields.
Hi
I think its super frustrating not beeing able to search for dates, or date ranges in the result window.
Lets say I have a dataset with 2 dates, date picked up and date delivered.
Then I need to search broad in the result window, for a given date. With search in both coloumns.
Could we please have a simple specific date search, and maybe a from-to date? Like in the filter?
Or go all the way and look at excel date filter?
Kind regards
At work I use a laptop and two external monitors. (L, EX1, EX2) <- that's how it's set up
When working in Alteryx I put my main window of Alteryx on EX1 and Results/Configuration tab on EX2
Sometimes I need to unplug my laptop, go to the meeting - or, what I have been doing lately, go to one of the meeting rooms and use standing desk to work there.
Problem is when I disconnect my laptop from the docking station (where external monitors are connected) other windows "jump" to the laptop screen, apart from Alteryx external tabs - meaning I can't "reach" it, even if I disable/enable or restart Alteryx.
It's not really a complaint of any sort but just a discussion if there is a way for this to be improved?
I have a use case where I am transitioning workflows to someone -
One workflow leverages the outputs of one workflow as inputs in to another - it would be awesome if I could include a link on a tool or comment box that would automatically open the exact output tool. Right now I am taking pictures and mentioning the names of files and tool-ids. Seems like it would be an easier way.
MemSQL is a very popular high-velocity; high scalability database which is often used for analytics: https://portal.memsql.com/
However, when attempting to make a connection to MemSQL, Alteryx throws the error "Get Table List Error: Error opening "SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'aurora_version'": No Columns Returned."
From discussions with the support team at Alteryx - it appears that this is due to Alteryx presuming that the database is a MySQL database (because MemSQL also uses the MariaDB ODBC driver) and then sending a followup query to identify system version before making a connection - however MemSQL does not support this value so the connection fails.
Request:
- Please can we add the ability to connect to MemSQL without this error (i.e. trap this error and identify the DB version)
- Please can we give an advanced view to Alteryx users so that they can see this additional traffic and change this where needed?
NOTE: By providing an advanced view - users can understand and diagnose / fix behaviours that Alteryx assumes by default, but which are not always relevant or useful. An example of this is that on MS SQL Alteryx tries to open a cursor on columnstore tables by default and you have to use a workaround - please can you give us the ability to see and change these under-the-covers behaviours that are presumed by default.
- It may be useful to the Alteryx corporation to reach out to MemSQL and add Alteryx to the list of applications that can be used with MemSQL:
https://docs.memsql.com/v6.8/guides/client-and-application/third-party-integrations/introduction/
To replicate:
- Fire up a MemSQL cluster (easiest is to get a trial cluster using the link above, or use an internal DB)
- Connect to this DB using the MariaDB ODBC connector (as recommended by MemSQL)
- Test this connection works with an ODBC compliant app like Tableau; Excel; etc
- Then attempt to connect using Alteryx - see screenshot below.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
6 | |
5 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |