Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Hi all,
When testing a macro with interface tools in use - the value that is used if running in normal execution (hit the big play button) is 0 or blank, irrespective of the value set for default on the component.
e.g.
Please can you change this so that the value passed through the interface tools in testing mode is the specified & configured default value?
Thank you
Sean
It's not uncommon to start out with an InputData control, and then 2/3 of the way through you realise that you need to change this to a dynamic input.
Could we add the capability to right-click on an inputData; and convert to Dynamic Input (just like you can on a TextInput to change it to a Macro Input)?
That has bugged me for years.
The dynamic input tool allows some fairly complex transformations to the underlying query - but it's not always easy to debug this when it doesn't behave as expected.
Could we add the ability to inspect the resulting query (just like you can on the InDB queries using the dynamic output component?)
It is currently possible to see this in the results / messages pane, but I can't find a way to get this into a data-stream to persist it or manipulate it.
It would be great if Alteryx allowed users to copy and paste data directly from excel into the workflow canvas as a text input. Sometimes I create quick mapping tables in excel that I do not want to save on my desktop or shared drive as it is a quick fix or solution. Tableau allows users to copy and paste data sets directly into a sheet for use. Can we make this happen??
Yours Truly,
Trevor
It would be really great to have Dynamic Detour tool where you could specify the detour direction as an input to the tool rather than an imbedded control.
This would allow workflow branching.
Using a filter for this passes a dataset with no rows in it which causes dynamic in-db or dynamic input tools to error.
Would like to see the Directory tool output results for folders that are empty.
My particular use case is requiring me to join a dataset with a file system directory and identify each dataset record's corresponding folder in a file directory. Each folder in that directory has subfolders that require a document to be located inside, and I'd like to be able to use the Directory tool to identify which subfolders are empty for which records.
Hi
The native email tool is great up to a certain volume, but at high volume it makes more sense to use sendgrid to take advantage of its features like deliverability etc
Would be great if there was a ready-made connector tool for SendGrid
Thanks
Please add option to right-click a module tab to rename the yxmd file. This would be easy to do, for you, and quite handy.
We waste a lot of time to search a field to join it in join or to deselect it select or to summarize in summarize. This mainly happens when we have long list of fields.
As search bar to find the field on top of any of these tools will be really helpful.
Specially, for join tool if we can type the field name while joining would really help.
Thank you,
Sanju
I would like to raise the idea of creating a feature that resolves the repetitive authentication problem between Alteryx and Snowflake
This is the same issue that was raised in the community forum on 11/6/18: https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Desktop-Discussions/ODBC-Connection-with-ExternalB...
Can a feature be added to store the authentication during the session and eliminate the popup browser? The proposed solution eliminates the prompt for credentials; however, it does not eliminate the browser pops up. For the Input/Output function, this opens four new browser windows, one for each time Alteryx tests the connection.
I often search for a tool on the canvas using control find and the tool number. If the tool is already in the visible pane, Alteryx highlights the tool with a faint dotted box. The problem is that I often have hundreds of tools that are visible and I have to constantly hunt around the canvas to locate the highlighted tool. Please update the control find settings so that when you use control find, Alteryx centers the current view on that exact tool. That way your eye can scan the middle of the canvas and locate the tool every time without this wasted effort searching for the tool outline.
It would be AWESOME if Alteryx had a feature to export logic that is within the workflow into a Visio, PDF, or Excel document to support documentation. Documentation isn't 'fun', but it is important/necessary.
The option to "Disable all tools that Write Output" is great during testing but I often need to toggle back and forth and its location on the Runtime tab of the Workflow Config is inconvenient.
I think it would be great to have a button for that on the toolbar with the added feature that it would visually display whether the feature is on or off (so you don't need to see an Output Data tool to determine the current status)
Sometimes we may have polygons, such as county boundaries, and need to split the polygons into smaller areas using polylines, such as roads. Please consider adding a polygon split by lines tool. I imagine it could be like the Poly-Split tool, but accept two inputs of a polygon field and a polyline field.
It is great to see the ability to stage data for bulk loading into Databricks in s3 and ADLS. Previously this only appeared to allow staging in Databricks DBFS.
However the current connector included in Designer 2022.1 has a key gap in functionality with ADLS Gen 2
The only authentication method provided to the ADLS storage is though a shared key.
Shared keys provide access that is
We do not provide users the shared key for the ADLS storage, thus our users cannot take advantage of this new feature.
The preferred method of authentication to ADLS would be
Either of these options can be provided though a service principal with a tenant id, client id and client secret as inputs to the bulk load tool
This request would specifically be to allow the ACL authentication. ACL would help empower our our self service data analysts and data scientists who could have access to a specific container.
For example
storageAccount/Container/directory
The ACL access in this tool would allow the Alteryx tool to follow the same access patterns where fine grained access was provided at the directory level and not at the storage account or container level. This would provide self service analysts and data scientists to use Alteryx as they need within their directory without providing higher level access.
Access control model for Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 | Microsoft Docs
Hi Team,
If you can please work on the idea of auto arranging the tools on Alteryx Designer. This would save a lot of tedious efforts, when we create a very big flow then it becomes very tough for us to arrange the tools properly and it becomes confusing sometimes.
Thanks
Can you add max and min options to the filter tool for date fields. Currently I have to use the sum function and join the max date back to the rest of the data and then filter. seems like an unnecessary amount of steps.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |