1 Review
Our submission guidelines & status definitions before getting started
2 Search
The community for a solution or existing idea before posting
3 Vote
By clicking the like in the top left corner of an idea you support
4 Submit
A new idea to suggest a new community feature or improvement
- Mark all as New
- Mark all as Read
- Float this item to the top
- Subscribe
- Bookmark
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
Currently, within the support portal, you cannot upload a .saz file as it is an unsupported file type:
However, this is essentially a route of investigation taken by Alteryx Support, primarily if the issue is derived from a web or connectivity issue. This issue can be worked around by sending an email rather than updating the ticket, however, the purpose of the Customer Case Portal is to provide a single point of access for tickets.
Kind Regards,
Owen
Hello!
Currently, tagging is pretty easy in the Alteryx Community, just type '@' followed by your favourite user, and you can add them to the post.
However, I've found sometimes it can require typing their full name to find users. I think this could be improved by having a 'suggested', or reordering of the tagging functionality. Let me demonstrate:
If I want to tag @patrick_digan (Sorry Patrick, just using you as an example :) )
I can type @patrick and he does not show up:
This makes me sad. Clearly I love my name displayed in his notifications.
The following accounts are displayed (sensibly, due to naming):
What I'd quite like is a couple of spots at the top of the searching functionality to be highlighted, as a suggested tag based on what you have typed. I think it would be sensible to have this determined by any of:
- Highest Rank (sensible, the sorting already exists in the graphql):
- Most recently/most often tagged
- Most active
- Potentially even more interesting, who has been seen most recently in threads (although I imagine this isn't possible easily).
And this would look like:
(yes, I do have certified MS Paint Master on my CV)
This should just to make it a bit easier to tag those most likely to be searched for on the Community.
Cheers!
Owen
Just a few years ago I saw the Alteryx Server Certification Exam.
However now it is not possible to test the Server skills.
Please give an Alteryx Server Certification Exam.
I would love to see horizontal scrolling support for mice. Currently, you allow scrolling vertically, but not horizontally. It would be so much quicker to be able to navigate with horizontal scrolling support.
For the PDF to Text tool- Config section-
We suggest a potential config change with pages to take in and scrub, similar to a print # of pages which can help benefit and drive more accuracy and ultimately performance as a separate section or within the Text Extraction Options
My proposal is to include a field that identifies the post language. Ive seen a few questions on spanish recently and I would like to help. But is difficult to fitler themy pr
Hello all,
I don't think AACP acronym is obvious for everyone... maybe calling the idea section to it "AACP (Cloud)" would help ?
Best regards,
Simon
Currently there's only the Curator role that can perform admin functions in Gallery. This role is too broad. We would like to have a separate admin role that can only perform user management but nothing else. Likewise, we would like an admin role that can manage workflows/collections, view metrics etc, but cannot do user management (view/add/edit/delete users). Such more fine-grained roles are necessary in IT management where strict separation of duties is a mandate.
A Curator can see all workflows and their general info in the Admin area. This is fine. However, a Curator can also paste the app ID of a workflow in his/her regular gallery view and can download the workflow even if the workflow is not shared directly with the Curator.
For example, a user (regardless of role) access a workflow that's shared with him/her like this:
https://<alteryx server hostname>/gallery/#!app/<workflow name>/<workflowId>
A Curator can paste the workflowId of a workflow that he/she does not have access to in the URL, and access the workflow to download it. We think that this is a security/IP risk as we do not want our Curators (system admins, Support reps) to be able to perform such an action.
Hi,
Can a User's Community Identity and their level of certification be added as columns here (see picture)? My thought is that my company wants Designer users to be Core Certified as a best practice and this would give us a way to monitor that.
Thanks,
Tim