Featured Ideas
Hello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Solution: Please have the Multi-Field Formula tool behave as the Formula tool does by persisting the field Description values.
Thanks!
John Hollingsworth
Allow the User to 'de-authenticate' a license so it can be installed on a new laptop.
Simple - Add an option that currently exists in the Analytic App properties to "On Success - Run Another Analytic App". Instead this option would be to Run Another Module
Complex - Create a new tool that would have a single input that would accept a list of filepaths to Alteryx modules. The modules would be run sequentially (module 2 run once module 1 was finished).
Cheers,
John Hollingsworth
Shapefile generate 4 filetypes (shp, shx, dbf, prj). When Alteryx generates a shapefile, the latter 3 file types are in uppercase, only shp is in lowercase. Can you change all 4 filetypes to lowercase so we don't have problems reading them in linux?
Thanks!
Simon
Can you add .tsv files as a file format in input/output tools in Alteryx? Can it also be recognized as an 'All Data Files' format?
Thanks!
1) A single tool that I want to connect to several tools (e.g. an input connecting to a number of selects)
2) Several tools that I want to connect to a single tool (e.g. several inputs connecting to a single union tool)
The current interface requires that I establish these connections by connecting the tools individually. It would be great to have the ability to have a right-click option. Simplistically, it might work something like this...
1) Select the tools that you want connected to a single tool (e.g. all the selects); Right-click; Get connection from Tool...{drop down list}
2) Select the tools that you want to get their connection from a single tool (e.g. all the inputs); Right-click; Connect to Tool...{drop down list}
When creating an Annalytic App, in the Actions tab, when creating an action, have the window display the actions in numerical order.
I have records of with several address fields per store: address 1, address 2, address 3.(e.g. po box 123, 456 main st, suite 600).
I geocode each address field in different iterations, but I want my final input to contain the best geocoding level. e.g. Actual before Zip9.
Can we rank the geocoding levels like this below? Then it will be easier to filter out the best geocoding level.
It would be very useful to have a new Grid selection question type. This would allow you to see a grid of data that you can sort and pan through and make selections. Similar to a multi select but in grid form with multiple columns.
This happens even if you do not reconfigure any upstream tools, but mearely access them, physically move them, say, an inch to the left or something like that, etc. Basically if you just "touch" any tool upstream, the Union Tool thinks that the manual config needs to be done over. But even if you do reconfig the Union Tool (either delete it and bring a new one in, or change the current one to Auto and then back to manual), it STILL does not recognize the tool as being correct.
The only way I have found to correct this issue is to click Play, and let it throw the error. Add Select Tools before the Union Tool to change the names to be common, then click on the Union Tool, and switch it to auto. Then click Play again. This can be very inconvenient if you have a module that takes hours (although you can limit your input records).
My suggestion would be to either disable the manual configuration, or add notes to the Help Files stating to use the manual configuration at your own risk, because once it's set and works at the time of creation, you cannot modify any upstream tools thereafter or else it will break the Union Tool and it cannot be repaired -- only choice is to use the Select Tool as I described above
I would like to work with percentages in a format similar to Excel, where the number remains a double for input, exports, and formula calculations, yet has an option to show the number as a percentage on reports and rendered outputs.
Please have Alteryx check the status of any output files for read-only or locked status. This change would prevent processing a file for an hour then having the process fail because the file was open or had improper permission.
Idealy, the output tool should ask the user what to do rather than fail and lose all the work.
I really like the new toolbar & tool palette. I think that the toolbar would be improved by a couple of (hopefully) minor tweaks:
1) The ability to 'lock' the Favorites toolbar so that it is always visible, no matter how far you have to scroll
2) The ability to move tool sets within the toolbar so that those less used are further off to one side
When I save records out of a browser tool, an info window appears when the file is finished saving. Please add a hyperlink to that window that will open the newly saved file. This should work the same way as the hyperlink in the Output message window.
Add a button to the zoom tools toolbar that zooms the workspace to all tools.