Featured Ideas
Hello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Example: State Code = 'MI' and Mosaic Type = 'A01' could be our Criteria. and State Code, Mosaic Type and Gender would be our crosscount fields.
Calgary crosscount (and append) would output (51 * 71 * 4) 14,484 rows (all states * all mosaic types * all gender values)
The desired crosscount would output (1 * 1 * 4) 4 rows (MI * A01 * 4).
This is a simplified example just to demonstrate my confusion when Alteryx responded to me that the tool is working as designed. In order to reduce the crosscount output, you must restate your query criteria in a filter post the calgary tool. If the count of rows output exceeds a thresshold, you can't even use the tool as it will generate too many rows.
By defining criteria in the Calgary Input tool, only the desired output records are generated. But by defining criteria in the Calgary crosscount tools, only the desired "combinations" have values plus it outputs all permutations and combinations of other non-qualifying records.
Please consider this request for an enhancement.
Thanks,
Mark
I'm a long time user of Photoshop and it would be great to get some similar zooming and panning functionality into Alteryx. Such as:
- hold down the "space bar" see a hand and pan across the canvas.
- hold down "CTRL" or "ALT and zoom on the canvas
- use the mouse scroll to zoom on the canvas
1. In series styles, replace current "Label Data Points" Yes/No dropdown options with "No/Top/Bottom/Left Side/Right Side/Alternating Sides" options to allow label text to fall above the line marking the top of the set (current implementation), below the top line, to the left or right or alternating between left and right. Side labels reduce the need for #3 below and alternating side labels partially mitigate the need for #2.
2. If "Label Data Points" is turned on, allow an option to set a minimum threshold to display the labels. In the current implementation the data point labels are placed on top of each other in cases where series with comparatively high volume are mixed with series with very low volume unless there is only one low volume series and it happens to be the last series in the set. With alternating side labels from #1 above this would only be an issue if more than one consecutive low volume series was displayed.
3. Lighten default series colors or change default text color to white. Black label text does not stand out or is unreadable against most of the default colors (dark blue, dark brown, etc.).
You can call me new school, but when I browse for inputs etc. in Alteryx, they are the old school windows interface where I have to hunt and peck through the file directory. Can you make it so we can use the newer interface with so I can type in my location and navigate a bit easier?
But with Alteryx you are only allowed to join a perfect match. It would be really great if you could add that functionality into 9.0
Currently Atleryx just takes a flat file and create a Tableau Extract (.tde) file. I would like to be able to to take two files and cube them together like Tableau allows me to use when I create my own Tableau Extract using Tableau. Right now I have to export two different files into excel files and then use Tableau to cube them and create an extract that gives me more power and functionality than the extract that Alteryx provides.
Once we have our files under code control (git) the bak file is not necessary and effectively doubles our storage usage.
yyyy-MM-dd
yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss
yyyy*MM*dd
yyyyMMdd
In addition, they have requested that we have the ability to convert from a date field to another date field. Currently, we can only convert to/from a string to date and vice versa, but not date to date (which would be helpful in a date format).
1. A User repository for macros in the Users folder, e.g. My DocumentsMy Alteryx Macros
This would make it easier to install macros without needing any administrator rights
2. A right click operation on a yxmc file (or a menu operation in Alteryx) that Install the macro ie. will move any macro into the folder above.
This would make it very simple to show new users how to install any macro you send them
Both these ideas will make it easier for partners and the Alteryx user community to share macros.
While Alteryx is processing it displays information in the module with record/file infromatoin. Once processing is complete this information is gone, except for in the output window. Could you add a key combination or button toggle to redisplay this info from the prior run. It would be very helpful for debugging.
Allow User to set priorities of streams in tool and to be able to release streams in a certain order.
Chris
Chris