Featured Ideas
Hello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Please test/certify Teradata 16.2 for designer, server, scheduler, and Gallery applications.
I would love to see a multi-output filter for cases where I want to route records to different places for processing based on the value of a single field.
For example I want to filter each letter to a different destination:
Letter | Number |
A | 1 |
B | 1 |
C | 1 |
D | 1 |
E | 1 |
F | 1 |
A | 2 |
B | 2 |
C | 2 |
D | 2 |
E | 2 |
F | 2 |
I would love to see a single tool that can send each letter to a different destination. See the attached screenshot for a concept of what this could look like.
After the upgrade to Alteryx 2018.4, the publish to tableau server tool no longer has the feature to get the authorization header to make subsequent calls in the workflow.This feature was present in the older versions of the tool i.e Publish to tableau server 1.09,1.08.1 but not in the new version 2.0.0
I think this feature should be present in all the versions of the publish to tableau server tool.
Cheers
If you have a field length of say 10 in a Select Tool, then you use a Left Join tool and change that length to say 4. This turns that field red - as it should. Then add a Select tool after the Union. It should say 4 in the second Select tool. But instead it says 10. If it was changed to 10 (and it wasn't) then the field s/b red.
We needed to manually change this on our end but it would be nice if in 9.5 this easy upgrade was done already...
I haven't needed to do this for over a year, but I just tried in 2018.4 and the functionality is not there any more 😞
I'm trying to open an Excel file and customise the SQL used to read the data.
I've found this in other posts:
then I found this one 😞
Hopefully this feature will be re-instated soon 🙂
Hello!
There this very handy functionality in Alteryx that when you drag files from a Windows explorer onto the Canvas, the tools automatically convert to Input Tools. When making Alteryx smaller using this - button, the canvas gets minimalized to nothing. This means I cannot drag files onto the canvas. The suggestion is to always keep a little bit of canvas space here to drop files onto. Just another small QoL issue.
Cheers,
Marco
Our company deals a lot in .dif, .kat, and .px7 files for importing into our softwares. Would it be possible to add these additional output types since it would save the additional step of re-saving the Excel file as a .dif.
Thanks.
I have a large dataset (~200k) of routers with the utilisation figures per month over 36 months. What I have been doing till now is using the TS Model Factory to config and TS Forecast Factory to generate the forecast for the next 6 months grouping by router. Great! Except the values returned per device are exactly the same for the next 6 months. Obviously by not using the ETS / ARIMA macros I lose the ability to configure in more detail.
What I would like is be able to set the parameters of the ETS/ARIMA model in advance then run the batch macro for the number of routers and return a 6 month forecast that takes into account all the parameters.
Happy to supply data if required!
Thanks in advance
Mark
It's been a while since I was last on these forums, and I can't find the suggestions subforum, only one massive 'Designer' forum. Hopefully I'm posting this in the correct place.
Anyway, the font colour on my Basic filter dialog dropdowns is for some reason bizarrely light and difficult to read. How do I fix this? It used to be a black font, so I'm trying to figure out what I've done wrong. It needs to be darker. Thanks
Hello Alteryx Community,
I've recently started using Alteryx and one option on the Output Data tool I think that could be useful to others and myself is the option to choose: Append to an extract file (Create if does not exist). This is similar to the already existing Overwrite existing extract file (Create if does not exist) option.
My case for this is... I'm in the situation where I'm setting up a flow that I know from the offset is going to be a repeatable flow that is designed to build up data over time and so I will be running the Output Data tools in append mode. Except for the first run, I can't append to an extract that doesn't exist! The flow in question has over around 20 Output Data tools and while it wouldn't take terribly long to reconfigure after the initial run, it is a bit tedious. I think there is scope for my proposed option for being implemented either as a standalone option or to replace the current append option.
Example of my current flow:
The new insight tool offers some great charting abilities but it does not integrate with other reporting tools. The tool doesn't support pictures,tables or any way to pull text from the data in the workflow in. This really prevents it from being a solution to any of the my reporting needs.
When using the 'Select' tool, often many columns are deselected, making it difficult to locate the remaining selected columns. It would save time to move deselected columns to the bottom of the ‘Select’ tool configuration after leaving the tool. Both selected and de-selected columns should retain their incoming field order within the group.
Add some sort of highlight to an input data icon that currently has a record limit set. Maybe an orange exclamation point on top the icon visually queing the analyst that the setting might need to be adjusted after process is complete.
After developing complicated workflows (using over 200 tools and over 30 inputs and outputs) in my DEV or QA environment, I need to switch over to Production to deploy it, but it's incredibly annoying to have to change 30 data inputs individually from QA to Prod, DEV to QA, etc. If I need to go back to QA to change something and re-test, I have to do it all again. etc.etc.
I need a way to be able to change mass amounts of data sources at once or at least make the process a lot more streamlined to make it bearable. Otherwise it is incredibly difficult to work within multiple environments.