Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
I sometimes find that a workflow would be more efficient if I swapped the order of a couple tools. It would be cool if we could select 2 tools and then right-click or something to swap them.
Speed up canvas edits - The Create/Remove Space Tool
Usually day two of working with a canvas I realize that I have been a fool, and I come up with a significantly more elegant or simple solution. Moving all of the containers or tools to fit my slick new container is cumbersome and slow. I've created a GIF of a feature several tools have which allows the user to easily move and arrange items on the canvas.
Open source tool used in demo: bpmnJs
Hi all,
I was recently helping a new starter assemble an app the included a long check box list in its interface, and stumbled upon a possible feature to be added to your interface tools. Here’s the situation in a nutshell:
So, here’s my suggestion: Can a “Window Height” option be added to the List Box tool?
Given that Tree already has this functionality, I think it would make sense to include such a feature for List Box as well. As of v11.3, this feature does not appear to be included.
Thoughts?
Current option in Tree interface tool
Analytical apps currently do not have the ability to provide any indication of progress to users when hosted on the galaxy.
It would be valuable to be able to provide a progress bar or some indication of progress to the user when invoking analytical apps from the gallery.
Take this example macro
I've build in a message on the tool to inform the user that the macro is set up in test mode. What this macro does is it will either filter the records based on a condition which the user provides in the macro configuration via a text input tool, for example Contains([Name],"Goodman") or they can select a check box to override the testing mode.
What I want is the user to be notified when there is a filter condition being applied, so they can quickly identify where in the workflow data might not be the full dataset. At the moment this is achieved using the error tool, but due to be it being the error tool you are limited to only specifying the red !
Therefore my idea is to update the error tool to allow the user to specify additional indicators, such as a warning triangle, because the message I am displaying is actually a warning to the user. Additionally it would be great if you could provide custom images (for example a glass flask) to show it's in a test mode, like you can with the macro image tools.
Hello. While working at my company it has come up a few times that An Interface tool that acts like a standard "grid" would be extremely helpful.
This tool would allow users to update data that has a logical link to each-other like a stanard "row". Below are a few very simple examples where this would be extremely helpful.
#1) An application is being used as a file System ETL that has an interface that allows users to select what data to pull from a flat file and store in a database. The users can pick which 'columns' to keep by choosing the following information. The column name, type, and final database location of that column.
In this case a user needs to enter 3 key pieces of field information that have to relate to eachother.
#2) There is a table in a database that has thresholds for a specific law at the state level. (for Example: All loans in Florida must have a loan balance < 300k). However these laws can be updated, and the end users want the ability to #1: See the data, and then #2: Update it if the laws have changed.
A grid in this case would be perfect, as they could query the data to see the 50 states and specified limits, and then change the data in the "limits" column in order to update the database.
The previous 2 examples are pretty simple examples, but I have run into this request a few times from my personal experience, so figured I would see what everyone thought!
The ability to limit the number of records (either on a specific input tool, or via the Workflow Properties) is super useful when developing a workflow...
...but how many times do you forget that a record limit was set and then spend ridiculous amounts of time trying to figure out why something isn't working properly? (I can't be the only person this has happened to...).
Wouldn't it be fantastic if a warning/message was shown in the workflow results (e.g. "Input Tool (n) has a record limit set"
or "Record Limits are set on the Workflow Properties")?
Can the inputs to app interface tools update other interface tools within the same app? Right now, I believe the only way to do this is with chained-apps, but I don't wish to go that route again.
Just one example:
Can a Dropdown interface tool update a listbox interface tool with an action?
Right now, I have two interface tools in an app:
For the Listbox tool , it references an external source file for the NAME:VALUE pairs, let's call this file: Category1.yxdb.
I would like for the resulting dropdown selection to update this external source file to say, Category1.yxdb or Category2.yxdb or Category3.yxdb, etc.
The different .yxdb files here have different name:value pairs within them.
It doesn't seem like this possible at the moment, but please let me know if this is something that's currently supported within Alteryx.
Thanks,
Collin
It would be nice to have functionality similar to the List Box where a user can select all items at once, or deselect all items at once. The workaround for now would be to roll everything up to an individual Key (maybe called "All"). But it would still be nice to have those two options (again, just like on the list box).
This idea is concerned with suggesting values based on text box entry in an analytic app. This would be an autocomplete within the text box interface based on matches to a list of connected values. For example, if someone was posting "805 Wells Road" it would expand the text box window and supply potential matches to click on.
Quick and dirty photoshop image below:
One thing I have noticed is that for some of the end-users of the apps I have in the gallery is that running the app from server is enough of a barrier that they don't use it at all. I have had to send links repeatedly to gallery, to apps on server for them to run them.
What I would love is a way to create a custom desktop icon (bear with me - I don't have the lexicon.) that an end-user would open and it would launch the app in the server directly (I'm assuming this would be opening a browser of choice, opening the app/workflow to the screen where it gives you the option to 'Run/Download/Schedule' rather than accessing it through a shared collection in the Gallery through a browser.
Possible extensions of this are the ability to create an app for a mobile device where they can access an app/workflow on server directly to run it from a phone/ipad.
This is a particular pet peeve of mine but I think it would tremendously beneficial. I would love to see Alteryx hold the layout created in the visual query builder.
There are situations where I have multiple tables from which I am joining. when I leave this scree, the format changes back to a standard layout. It takes valuable time to pull this apart so I can see what I am working on.
It would be awesome to default a container color depending on what tools you were using within that container. For instance:
Mostly input tools - container defaults to green
mostly prep tools - container defaults to blue
Mostly output/reporting tools - container defaults to orange
Along with this, it would be neat to be able to customize those colors depending on which tools mostly fill the container.
-AD
How about giving an auto-layout button to help easily layout the canvas even if the user has not neatly created the workflow?
It would be interesting to have the ability to change the orientation of a tool container separate from the orientation of the workflow. For example having a vertical tool container within a horizontal workflow will help keep the workflow short enough to view on one page. Also it would look alot better to collapse and expand vertically in a horizontal workflow.
It would be really useful to select a default date for Date interface tools for the end user. Really useful in other interface tools and would save a lot of time in testing.
Hello
Alteryx Desktop 2018.4 has a new interface which looks nice, but the labels and texts of its interface is difficult to read (as seen in the below screenshot).
It's seem that the interface's font type or size is not appropriate!
(Knowing that we didn't have any problem with the previous versions of Alteryx Desktop 11.7, 2018.2, & 2018.3)
So, I suggest to change the interface's font type or size of Alteryx Desktop 2018.4 as it was in the previous versions or to another font which is easy to read,
or at least having an option that allow the user to adjust the interface's font type and size.
My solution now is to downgrade to version 2018.3 where I have no problem at all regarding the interface's font.
Good afternoon,
If any one of you have had to create Column Rules in the Table Tool for multiple Table Tools you'll know how much of a pain it is to set the same rules over and over and over.
It would be an amazing addition if we had the functionality to copy column rules to apply to other Table Tools.
What are yalls thoughts?
-Nick
Example1
For those of us obsession with the look and feel of our workflows, it would be great to have the option to modify the paths of tool connections, as shown in the image below.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
7 | |
5 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |