Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Hello,
As of today, when you connect o, a database, you go through a batch of queries to retrieve which database it is ( cf https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Ideas/Smart-Visual-Query-Builder-for-in-db-less-te... where I suggest a solution to speed up the process) and then, Alteryx queries the metadata. In order to get the column in each table, Alteryx use a SHOW TABLES and then loop on each table. This is really slow.
However, since Hive 3.0, an information_schema with the list of columns for each table is now available. I suggest to use the information_schema.columns instead of the time-consuming loop.
PS : I don't know if it's linked to the Active Query Builder, the third-party tool behind the Visual Query Builder. In that case, it would be a good idea to update it as suggested here https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Ideas/Update-Query-Builder-component/idi-p/799086
Best regards,
Simon
With the growing demand for data privacy and security, synthetic data generation is becoming an increasingly popular technique for generating datasets that can be shared without compromising sensitive information especially in the healthcare industry.
While Alteryx provides a range of tools, I believe that a custom tool could help meet the specific needs of a lot of healthcare organizations and customers.
Some potential features of a custom synthetic data generation tool for Alteryx could include:
Integration with other Alteryx tools: The tool could be seamlessly integrated with other Alteryx tools to provide a comprehensive data preparation and analysis platform.
Customizable data generation: Users could set parameters and define rules for generating synthetic data that accurately represents the statistical properties of the original dataset.
Data visualization and exploration: The tool could include features for visualizing and exploring the generated data to help users understand and validate the results.
I believe that a custom synthetic data generation tool could help our organization and customers generate high-quality synthetic datasets for testing, model training, and other purposes.
Imagine the scenario where you have an input that has new columns everyday, like the one that can be seem above. But with millions of rows. And you need to build the Total column. This cannot be achieved with the formula tool, because the columns of the input are dynamic.
Client | 20220101 | 20220102 | 20220103 | 20220104 | 20220105 | 20220106 | 20220107 | 20220108 | 20220109 | Total |
0000001 | 356 | 223 | 454 | 542 | 827 | 321 | 614 | 759 | 977 | 5628 |
...
The default way that i use and see people using to solve this type of problem is transposing the data/summarizing/joining back the data. I tested this with the Enable Performance Profiling for 10 million rows (workflow attached), and as expected, when you transpose/summarize/join back a large volume of rows, you spend too much computing power. For this test, at least 5x more time than by just using the formula tool (workflow attached):
So, what i propose here is:
1) That the Multi-Field formula could be able to evaluate a set of columns dynamically and generate just one new column (the sum of the evaluated columns, the concatenation of it...).
Example of Designer Discussion that would be benefit from it: https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Discussions/Transposing-Filtering-and-Summarizing-...
2) That the Multi-Field formula could be able to reference column-1, column-2, column+1, column+2, like the Multi-Row formula is.
Example of Designer Discussion that would benefit from it: https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Discussions/Copy-Field-and-create-two-mor-fields-w...
Thanks.
Hi all,
Is it possible to add an option to 'Add an Image' in the settings option of Interface Designer while building Apps or macros?
Currently, we can add Group box, Link, Tab, and Label. It would be really helpful if we can add static images as well!!
This would enable a developer to add an explanatory image just as a link or label is used to communicate to end user.
I am attaching a screenshot for the reference.
Thanks in advance!!
Regards,
Shreyansh Rathod
Hi there,
My idea comes when I've built an application, where user select filter from drop-down list. However it contains thousands of records, so it takes lot's of time to find desired record.
In Excel and MS Access when you use filter you can put many letter and filter shows rows that match the input. In Alteryx user can only put first letter, which is huge drawback to my users.
This is how it works in Excel:
Hope you like it!
Hello All,
I believe there needs to be a new tool added to Alteryx. I am frequently encountering cases where I will have 0 data point feeding a workflow stream that causes my workflows to fail. Because of this, I am having to put in fail safes to keep this from happening.
There should be a tool that if there is no records that are passing into it, anything after that tool will not fail.
For an example, within a workflow I am using a dynamic input that will pull a dynamic file. The file is not always there and the workflow should be able to run if that file is there or not. If the dynamic tool and other tools would process 0 records without failing this would also solve the issue.
I would be nice to have a tool that will block off the work stream if there are 0 records passing through the tool.
I rarely use the Group By tab on batch macros, but it's unfortunately always the first tab that pops up. When I have a questions tab on a batch macro, it would be great if it appeared first (ie I should see the questions tab when I click on my batch macro.) Thanks!
Hello,
As I mentioned in this previous idea : https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Ideas/Generic-In-database-connection-please-stop-i...
field mapping in generic in-db connection is based on Microsoft Sql Server. Given the specificity of MSQL Server field types, I would like to change that in order to at least be able to use another database. Without that, this feature has no sense at all.
Best regards,
Simon
It would be very helpful to have an output of the workflow into a step by step document. so someone who does not have access to Alteryx can undestand the steps taken to create the flow hence the result or output.
Alteryx has the ability to connect to data sources using fat clients and ODBC but not JDBC. If the ability to use JDBC could be added to the product it could remove the need to install fat clients.
I use the field name auto-complete feature whenever I can. One issue with it, however, is when there are parentheses in a field name. After auto-completing the field name, Alteryx highlights a portion of the field name after the first parenthesis. This is not ideal as I typically expect the cursor to be at the end of the field name so I may continue to type. In this scenario, unfortunately, I would begin to type over my field name and the expression gets messed up.
For example, as shown below, I begin to type "st" and then hit the tab button to complete the field name in my expression.
In this case, because my field name has parentheses in it, however, some of the field name remains highlighted and the cursor does not go to the end of the right bracket, as one would expect.
If I were to continue typing at this point, the highlighted portion of the expression would get erased and replaced.
Field names that do not contain parentheses continue to function correctly as shown below.
Similar to the thoughts in this idea, it would be great if the parenthesis matching functionality could be added to the formula tool as well.
There needs to be a way to step into macro a which is component of parent workflow for debugging.
Currently the only way to achieve to debug these is to capture the inputs to the macro from the parent workflow, and then run the amend inputs on the macro. For iterative / batch macros, there is no option to debug at all. This can be tedious, especially if there are a number of inputs, large amounts of data, or you are have nested macros.
There should be an option on the tool representing the macro in the parent workflow to trigger a Debug when running the workflow, this would result in the same behavior when choosing 'Debug' from the interface panel in the macro itself: a new 'debug' workflow is created with the inputs received from the parent workflow.
On iterative / batch macros, which iteration / control parameter value the debug will be triggered on should be required. So if a macro returns an error on the 3 iteration, then the user ticks 'Debug' and Iteration = 3. If it doesn't reach the 3rd iteration, then no debug workflow is created.
It would be awesome if there was a cross tab in DB option because right now I have to stream out millions of records to build a cross tab.
Under the Runtime setting, there is an existing option to "Disable All Tools that Write Output". This is incredibly useful when developing workflows when you don't want to overwrite existing files.
But this option doesn't disable all outputs, like Publishing to Tableau!
I suggest adding the option to disable ALL kinds of outputs, uploads, and publishing (except possibly logging and caching).
Currently, when one uses the Google BigQuery Output tool, the only options are to create a table, or append data to an existing table. It would be more useful if there was a process to replace all data in the table rather than appending. Having the option to overwrite an existing table in Google BigQuery would be optimal.
I like the new cache option in 2018.3, but I would like it to function a little bit different. Let's say you cache at a certain point and then continue to build after that. If I reach another checkpoint and want to cache, it currently re-runs the entire workflow (ie it ignores my cache upstream and just goes back to the beginning of the workflow); instead, I would rather have it utilize the upstream cache. Personally, caching is usually an iterative effort during development where I keep caching along the way. The current functionality of the cache is not conducive to this. Thanks!
Given the prevalence of XML - it seems that it's worth adding a native XML capability to Alterxy (similar to the discussion with @CharleyMcGee and @KaneG in the discussion forum). Currently XML is treated mostly like a big and oddly behaved text field, which really undermines the usefulness of XML in real applications.
What I'm thinking is:
- Add in a component, which acts like a join, but what it does is validates an XML file vs. an XSD file so that you can see if your XML file matches the schema definition. Tremendously useful if you've ever had to hand-craft XML.
- Add in a native data-type for XML (like you have a data-type for Centroids)
- On this XML data type - you can then do interesting things like walk the document object model, or iterate through all children (which fixes the issue of deeply nested XML being such a pain). This would bring XML parsing into the level of usefulness that programmers in Java & Visual Studio have enjoyed for years
- Finally - an ability to construct XML data files without having to text-hack this. i.e. something similar to the transpose tool, where for a given node, you can add children etc.
These four things would really really assist with getting Alteryx to be able to deal with modern data sets like JSON; XML and even web-page scrubbing.
As always - very happy to commit time to helping shape this - please feel free to reach out if that would be useful.
Thank you all
Sean
CC: @JoeM; @mceleavey; @MarqueeCrew; @NeilR; @Ned; @dawid_nawrot; @TaraM; @GeneR
I know it sounds trivial, but I hate having to do the extra click to get the browse tool to pop out. Just upgraded from 2020.2 to 2021.3. Before, you could pop out a browse window in 2 clicks:
Now you need 3 clicks:
Like I said, I know it sounds trivial, but when you do this dozens of times a day, it adds up to a big annoyance.
Anyway, was just wondering if enough others felt the same and if so, hopefully the browser behavior could be pushed back to a 2 click pop out.
Although I must say that I just LOVE the comma inserter.
Sometimes I need to connect to the data in my Database after doing some filtering and modeling with CTEs. To ensure that the connection runs quicker than by using the regular input tool, I would like to use the in DB tool. But is doesn't working because the in DB input tool doesn't support CTEs. CTEs are helpful for everyday life and it would be terribly tedious to replicate all my SQL logic into Alteryx additionally to what I'm already doing inside the tool.
I found a lot of people having the same issue, it would be great if we can have that feature added to the tool.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 |