Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Add some sort of highlight to an input data icon that currently has a record limit set. Maybe an orange exclamation point on top the icon visually queing the analyst that the setting might need to be adjusted after process is complete.
It would be very useful to have a new Grid selection question type. This would allow you to see a grid of data that you can sort and pan through and make selections. Similar to a multi select but in grid form with multiple columns.
I have no idea how many people are using the .Net API to build custom tools, but found an issue with its assembly scanning.
It doesnt pick up classes implementing IPlugin in an abstract base class. Can be worked around by moving the interface onto the concrete implementation but think it should pick up any concrete class implementing the IPlugIn regardless of whether on the class itself or a base class.
My client today asked if Alteryx could be configured to build/run horizontally from right to left. Thought I'd post the idea.
I will try to make this short but the back story is a bit long.
I was recently tasked with scraping a website requiring repeated call to the URL with about 10,000 different queries. Pushing all 10,000 at the Download tool caused intermittent DownloadData to be returned with HTML from what appeared to be a default fallback help page. Not what I needed. I suspected the site may have seen all the calls in rapid succession as a DDoS attack or something, so I put a Throttle tool in line to lessen the burden on their server. It reduced the failed calls, but there was still more than I found acceptable, requiring pulling out the failed queries and repeating the same throttled processing. Putting time between each record was what I needed. And then I found this Wait/Pause Between Processing Records Just what I needed.
Now the constructive criticism. I hope I don't offend anybody.
The macro does the job using a simple ping statement inside a grouped batch macro, pinging until a selected time interval has passed. It does this repeated pinging for every record. That can add up to a lot of pings especially if the time interval is rather large and a lot of records are being processed. Then DDoS popped into my head. The same issue that led me to find this very solution.
So, I started thinking how could I accomplish this same wait between records and iterative macro seemed plausible, seeing that loops can be used in code to do this very thing.
I have attached the macro I came up with. Feel free to check it out, critique the hell out of it, and/or used it if it will solve any problem you might have. I only ask that you keep the macro intact and give credit where credit is deserved.
Thanks for your time,
Dan Kelly
I found a great use for the visual Layout Tool which solved the formatting issues I was running into. Unfortunately it doesn't pass through additional columns from the source. This means that I am unable to use the batch rendering (the "group data into separate reports" functionality in the render tool). See images below.
Image 1: Layout keeps columns in output 🙂
Image 2: Visual Layout drops columns in output
Cheers
It would be nice to have the option to overlay multiple addresses to find marketing opportunities within the heatmap. Currently I have to map the addresses elsewhere and click back and forth between tabs to see where they lay within the chosen variables.
Is it possible to add some color coding to the InDB tool. I am building out models InDB and I end up with a sea of navy blue icons. Maybe they could generally correspond to the other tools. For example the summary would be orange. Etc Formula Lime Green.
I'd love the ability to Input an already-formatted Print Layout area within an Excel document, or a .PDF document in an effort to standardize reports needed on a regular basis.
Our department doesn't create everything that rolls into these reports, but we'd love the ability to incorporate external documents and save our company hours.
Is it possible to format an input tool to only look at the Print Area? If not, that capability would be wonderful.
Thanks!
The language options have been so helpful for our Global team; is a Korean language option under consideration for Designer & the online training courses?
recently loaded the new V11 and gettting used to it. one immediate gripe is the new version of the Formula Tool no longer supports multiple field actions. In the prior version I could change Data Types on many fields at once. I could move multiple fields in a block at once. there were a few other things but these are things I am sorely missing on my first use of V11. I created about 20 fields in quick succession just getting names down and then going back and putting in formula which were variations on a theme. When done I noticed the default DataType was V_WString and I wanted integer. In the past it was no big deal because I could select the block or interspersed fields and then right click to change data type for all to the same data type. it was very handy and now appears to be gone. please bring these things back.
For some workflows I see the value of concentrate a high number of formulas in a single Formula Tool, specially when you have a considerable number of simple and independent formulas. This makes future changes to the workflow easier, since you (and other in your team) know where exactly to find the formulas in a workflow. But as higher the number of formulas in Formula Tool, more difficult is to find a specific formula in the tool.
My suggestion is to implement a sort option - so you list the formulas/columns alphabetically - and/or a filter option - bringing the relevant formulas/columns as you type.
Since I am relatively new in the Alteryx world,I am not sure if there is an alternative for that (officially or unofficially speaking).
Thanks.
Sort by file size based on first digit in file size (should be based on all digits).
Instead of current logic standing behind Round function ([variable1]/[variable2], mult) more intuitive will be approach known for example from SQL where the second operator represents number of decimal places, i.e. [variable]=23,4567 with new logic - Round([variable], 2) = 23,46.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
27 | |
13 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 |