Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Hello Team,
If we have the flexibility to add new formula any where in the formula tool not just at the bottom of the existing formula's that would be great.
Right now after development if there is change and an additional formula is required which will be input for existing formulas in Formula tool then effort to change is high, if we have the flexibility to add formula at any place in formula tool then the effort will be less.
Alternate Solution : Add one more formula tool before the existing formula tool and include the new formula but i
think if the formula tool has the flexibility to add formula anyplace possible that would be great.
Thank You,
Visali
Greetings All,
I recently came across a workflow that has hundreds of tools and I need change a "variable" within several filter tools. There is prob 30-40 filters and they vary in what they filter. A find and replace feature would be awesome, or even a simple find function that shows were the variable is located within a workflow/tool. Could use user constants but these workflows were already made when I joined and it would be more difficult.
So a feature similar to the MS Word feature of search/find/find all/replace/replace all would be great for the actual variables with the tools.
When Alteryx Designer launches, the splash screen forces itself in front of all other windows. For the 1 minute it takes to load it prevents me from doing other things.
Please allow it to be in the background when another application is selected or able to be minimized.
My organization requires users to change their active directory passwords every so often. That's fine. That does create an issue with changing passwords on all workflows that contain a tableau server publish, but that's not the real issue here.
What's more annoying is that once that password is changed, the data source name and project is lost. When updating multiple data sources across workflows (or within the same workflow) this becomes quite cumbersome and annoying.
I know there are limitations on the partner side as this is technically a tableau controlled thing, but is there anything that can be done here?
In previous version of Alteryx, when the user selected records in the Browse tool, a count for those records would show next to the display that shows the total record count. When you separated the windows (Browse map is in one window, Browse data in another) that feature went away on the data side (it still shows in the map view side). The only way to know how many records the user selected to is launch a whole other window showing just the selected records. Could you please bring back the selected records display, like in the attached image?
I often copy/paste chunks of workflow and paste it into the same workflow (or a different one). It always seems to paste just diagonally below the upper most left Tool. This creates a real mess. I'd like to be able to select a small area within the work area and have the chunk of workflow I'm pasting drop there - instead of on top of the existing build.
Can a spell check option be included that will check the spelling in the comment tool text box and tool container captions?
Ideally a global check would be nice for the annotation section of each tool, especially if it can be determined if I changed the annotation from the default one on some tools.
During development it seems the syntax checker or whatever process runs behind the scenes after a tool is modified reviews the full workflow.
Ex - Just from observation if I modify the file name in an output tool I don't see why it would rerun the full syntax check process.
This reduce the time waiting to continue development.
Hi,
Noticed an issue in the Browse tools, specifically if you’ve run a module once, where browse tools are displaying information, and then you add new browse tools into the process (without clicking run yet). What I’m seeing is if I’m looking at the “existing” Browse that is showing data, and then click directly onto a Browse tool that was added after the run (not remembering I just added it), the “new” Browse tool is showing the previous Browse tools info, I literally have to click on the canvas, and then back to the new Browse tool for Alteryx to recognized there isn’t any data to display in it yet. My point being it can be misleading to the user if they don’t recognize the wrong info is being displayed (because as you click back & forth between the two, the data stays the same, making the user think the issue is in the process rather than just the display, can waste a lot of time backtracking for no reason). I’ve seen this behavior over at least the past 3 engine updates, just FYI.
It would be nice to be able to search "Variables", "Functions", "Saved Expressions" within the expression boxes of tool configurations, instead of having to fiddle with the hierarchical tree structure all the time!
The new 10.6 leaves all this empty space to the right of the "Connect" field and "Options"/"Preview" fields. This means I have to drag out my tab way farther than I used to in order to see the same amount of information... Can you go back to having these fields stretch all the way to the right of the frame? When you have huge workflows, every little bit of space really matters.
Look at all that empty space!
It would be awesome if we could perform a 'create or replace' on an excel file with the output tool. The tableau TDE extract has an output option that says "Overwrite existing extract file (Create if does not exist)" If the excel file format option could have this same output option that would help out a ton!
Often when working on problems posed by other people, they provide a sample table of data.
Would love a trivial way to copy from the Community to Alteryx.
It would be very helpful to have a SOQL Edit textbox for the entire SOQL statement not just the WHERE clause. This would allow us to select fields based on parent or child relationships to the table as well.
We have to run the full workflow at a time, if you can please think of something like partial running of the workflow and also while designing the flow if we add new tools, we have to run the entire flow again.
Why can't it hold the intermediate data to avoid re-running the entire code.
Other tools that I have used allow you to determine where you are caching from so instead of always having to cache at the input, you could cache after a big join. This would be great for efficiency as having to run everything through the entire workflow every time is innefficient and I end up spending a lot of time waiting for my workflow to go through the same tools.
Dear Team
If we are having a heavy Workflow in development phase, consider that we are in the last section of development. Every time when we run the workflow it starts running from the Input Tool. Rather we can have a checkpoint tool where in the data flow will be fixed until the check point and running my work flow will start from that specific check point input.
This reduces my Development time a lot. Please advice on the same.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Gowtham Raja S
+91 9787585961
Hi,
Today I pressed F1 in the Output Tool to find out what the setting Transaction Size does. It turned out that this is not documented.
It would be a great idea to make a documentation that covers the options of a tool.
Regards,
Frank
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
23 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |