Advent of Code is back! Unwrap daily challenges to sharpen your Alteryx skills and earn badges along the way! Learn more now.
Free Trial

Alteryx Designer Desktop Ideas

Share your Designer Desktop product ideas - we're listening!
Submitting an Idea?

Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!

Submission Guidelines

Featured Ideas

Dear Alteryx, 

One day, when I pass from this life to the next I'll get to see and know everything!  Loving data, one of my first forays into the infinite knowledge pool will be to quantify the time lost/mistakes made because excel defaults big numbers like customer identifiers to scientific notation.  My second foray will be to discover the time lost/mistakes made due to 

Unexpanded Mouse Wheel Drop Down Interaction

Riveting right?  What is this?  It's super simple, someone (not just Alteryx) had the brilliant idea that the mouse wheel should not just be used to scroll the page, but drop down menus as well.  What happens when both the page and the drop down menu exist, sometimes disaster but more often annoyance.  Case in point, configuring an input tool.

 

See the two scenarios below, my input is perfectly configured, I'll just flick my scroll wheel to see what row I decided to start loading from 

Happy Path, cursor not over drop down = I'll scroll down for you

Screenshot 2024-09-30 094624.png

 

Sad Path, cursor happened to hover the dropdown sometimes on the way down from a legit scroll = what you didn't want Microsoft Excel Legacy format?

Screenshot 2024-09-30 094659.png

And you better believe Alteryx LOVES having it's input file format value changed in rapid succession., hold please...

Screenshot 2024-09-30 095544.png

 

Scroll wheels should scroll, but not for drop down menus unless the dropdown has been expanded.

 

Oh and +1 for mouse horizontal scrolling support please.

 

 

Currently when a unique tool is used, and a field is removed upstream then the workflow fails to move forward. If you have one or two unique fields being used then it is no big deal, but when you have a very complex workflow then you have to click into each one of those tools in order to update. This can be very problematic and creates a lot of time following all the branches that is connected after the 1st unique tool is used. My suggestion is to make this a warning instead of a fail or have an option to select fail or warning like the union tool is setup. This way people can decide how they want this tool to react when fields are removed. 

A client just asked me if there was an easy way to convert regular Containers to Control Containers - unfortunately we have to delete the old container and readd the tools into the new Control Container.

 

What if we could just right click on the regular Container and say "Convert to Control Container"? Or even vice versa?!

Hello,

A lot of tools that use R Macro (and not only preductive) are clearly outdated in several terms :
1/the R package
2/the presentation of the macro
3/the tools used

E.g. : the MB_Inspect

 

image.png

Ugly but wait there is more :

 

image.png

Also ; the UI doesn't help that much with field types.

Best regards,

Simon

The idea behind encrypting or locking a workflow is good for users to maintain the workflow as designed. 

However, when a user reaches a level of maturity equivalent to that of the builder or more, or even when changes are required - the current practice is to keep a locked and unlocked version of the workflow so that it allows for a change in the future. 

It would be much simpler if we can have the power to lock and unlock workflows with a password. Users can then maintain and keep the passwords so that they can continue with the workflow. 

Not everybody is on Server yet so this feature is very helpful for control before Server migration. Otherwise it’s just password protecting a folder containing the workflow package, then re-locking a new save file each time a change is made or when someone new takes over on prem. 

I would love to see an option to run only one container without having to disable all others (and tools not in containers).

 

I've got workflows with MANY different queries/tools each in their own containers and some tools outside of containers.  Occasionally I need to run or re-run just one of the containers (usually several times when the datastream contains Crosstab or Transpose tools where some fields/options will not populate until the workflow has previously run).  Normally I'd either have to disable all other containers and/or select EVERYTHING that I do not wish to run an add them all to another container that I could then disable.  An option to disable everything outside of a specific container would be most welcome and save a lot of time!


Currently if I have a connection between two tools as per the example below:

cgoodman3_0-1674567563258.png

I can drag and drop a new tool on the connection between these tools to add it in:

cgoodman3_1-1674567618537.png

 

And designer updates the connections nicely, however if I select multiple tools and try and collectively drop them inbetween, on a connection then it won't allow me to do this, and will move the connection out of the way so it doesn't cause an overlap.

cgoodman3_2-1674567779868.png

Therefore as a QoL improvement it would be great if there was a multi-drop option on connections between tools.

 

 

  • Enhancement

Hello all,

We all know for sure that != is the Alteryx operator for inequality. However, I suggest the implementation of <> as an other operator for inequality. Why ?

<> is a very common operator in most languages/tools such as SQL, Qlik or Tableau. It's by far more intuitive than != and it will help interoperability and copy/paste of expression between tools or from/to in-database mode to/from in-memory mode.

Best regards,

Simon

I would like a way to disable all containers within a workflow with a single click.  It could be simply disable / enable all or a series of check boxes, one for each container, where you can choose to disable / enable all or a chosen selection. 

 

In large workflows, with many containers, if you want to run a single container while testing it can take a while to scroll up and down the workflow disabling each container in turn.  

Hello,

Here is the proposal about an issue that I face frequently at work.

 

Problem Statement -

Frequent failure of workflows that have either been scheduled or run manually on server because the excel input file is sometimes open by another user or someone forgot to close the file before going out of office or some other reason. 

 

Proposed Solution - 

The Input/Dynamic Input tools to have the ability to read excel files even when it is open so that the workflows do not fail which will have a huge impact in terms of time savings and will avoid regular monitoring of the scheduled workflows.

 

 

Hello! It would be great if I could "favorite" a tool when I search for it in the search bar in Designer. Currently, I can drag and drop it to the Canvas, but if I want to "favorite" it, I have to remember the icon and color, then go find it in the right tab. This would be a nice enhancement!

Hello all,

As of today, you can only (officially) connect to a postgresql through ODBC with the SIMBA driver
help page :
https://help.alteryx.com/current/en/designer/data-sources/postgresql.html#postgresql

 

 

image.png

You have to download the driver from your license page

 

image.png


However there is a perfectly fine official driver for postgresql here https://www.postgresql.org/ftp/odbc/releases/

I would like Alteryx to support it for several obvious reasons :
1/I don't want several drivers for the same database
2/the simba driver is not supported for last releases of postgresql
3/the simba driver is somehow less robust than the official driver
4/well... it's the official driver and this leads to unecessary between Alteryx admin/users and PG db admin.

Best regards,

Simon

Hi all,

 

When preparing reports with formatting for my stakeholders. They want these sent straight to sharepoint and this can be achieved via onedrive shortcuts on a laptop. However when sending the workflow for full automation, the server's C drive is not setup with the appropriate shortcuts and it is not allowed  by our admin team.

 

So my request is to have the sharepoint output tool upgraded to push formatted files to sharepoint. 

 

Thank you!

Tn the test environment in our POC for Alteryx - SharePoint connection,
the connection request from SharePoint Input Tool (Designer) to M365 server results in authentication failure with a proxy server.
After trials and errors, we see that the authentication fails because the Proxy server for M365 does not accept HTTP request without "Host" header.
(please see attachment for details)

 

Alteryx Support says that Share Point Tools do not set Host header in HTTP request on any Designer versions,
We use Designer 2022.3.1.430 and SharePoint Tool 2.5.0.
Alteryx Support recreated the same issue on Designer 2024.1.1.93 and SharePoint Tool 2.6.3 for Designer 2024.
and they suggested me to submit an Idea on the community site as an enhancement request.
 
So I submit this as a new idea:
To enhance SharePoint Tool to send HTTP request with Host header.
(more preferably, to send HTTP 1.1 where Host header is mandatory.)

 

At the same time, I have questions to the community:
  • Have anyone experienced the same error?
  • If yes, is there any workaround to connect with M365?
I would like to avoid keep the current security setting as it takes time to change it.
 
Thank you in advance for your support !

Parquet is a very fast, efficient and widely used data format, currently only below Parquet compression algorithms are supported and we cannot use Alteryx to read the parquet file that generated by other processes. This limits our usage in Alteryx.  

  • Read support: Snappy and Gzip compression algorithms.

  • Write support: Snappy only

It would be great for Alteryx to support all types of Parquet format so we can maximize the use of Alteryx in data analysis.

Hey all,

 

I don't know about you, but I have always had trouble hovering the mouse over the Results window pane trying to get the resize icon to appear. It seems like you need surgeon level precision to find the icon! 😷

 

I love Designer and want to see it be the best it can possibly be. I feel like increasing the clickable/hovering area for this resize would be amazingly helpful! 

Just wanted to see if we could get some community momentum going in order to get some developer eyes on this issue. 🙂

 

 Please help by bumping/upvoting this thread!

ksang_2-1700231361920.gif

 

 -K

Migrated this from another thread. Some folks tagged from the original post :)
@cpatrickwk @caltang @afellows @MRod @alexnajm @ericsmalley @MilindG @Prometheus @innovate20 

  • Enhancement

Hello all,

This is a very interesting feature of the List Box and Drop Down interface tool : the ability to select fields

image.png

image.png

However such a feature is not available for in-database, highly limiting the use of macros.

Please change.

Best regards,

Simon

Hello all,

It's really frustrating to have an "alteryx field type" in In-Database Select. It doesn't even make sense since we're manipulating only data in SQL database where those types does not exist. What we should see is the SQL field type.
alteryx_monetdb2_.png
Best regards,

Simon

Sounds simple :

 

image.png


Best regards,

Simon

Hello,

It's nice to have this OpenAI Connector but it seems it must be the default OpenAI URL. In my company, we use OpenAI on an Azure instance and I'm unable to connect to it.

(by the way, I know pre-sales teams have developed lot of connectors for fireworks, mistral, etc.. it would be very cool to have it available).

Best regards,

Simon

Top Liked Authors