Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
User should get an Alert that file is open when using Input Tool. Currently Alteryx just clocks when attempting to use an open file in an Input Tool.
Not sure I'd call this a user setting, but I couldn't figure out the right heading this belongs to.
When opening files, there are often times a couple of files at that aren't run on any kind of schedule or set time frame but you come back to when you need to run them.
There should be a way to set "FAVORITES" for a handful of files that you find yourself referring to on a repeated basis, but too far back to be on the 'recents' list because you open too many other files.
There is an irony in asking for what is essentially the Alteryx version of 'Formula Wizard' from Excel
As great as the guides have been in the community, the Batch Macro is one of most difficult to repeat and explain.
It would be great for users to have a prompt that recognises a Directory input of excel files and at the point of adding a Macro, having a series of prompts at each stage help build out the desired result (whether that be returning all sheets or specific sheets).
It would further highlight one the great features & key enablers of Alteryx
Hello all,
So, right now, we have two very separated products : Alteryx Designer and Alteryx Designer Cloud. But what if you want to go from Alteryx Designer on your desktop to the cloud ?
well, you will have to rewrite every single workflow because you can't publish or import your current workflow on Alteryx Designer Cloud. You cannot export Designer Cloud workflow to Alteryx Designer on Desktop either.
This is a huge limitation on cloud implementation and sells and the ONLY product I know that's not compatible between on-premise and cloud.
Please Alteryx, this is a no-brainer situation if you want to convince your customers !
Best regards,
Simon
Hello all,
As of today, we can easily copy or duplicate a table with in-database tool.This is really useful when you want to have data in development environment coming from production environment.
But can we for real ?
Short answer : no, we can't do it in these cases :
-partitions
-any constraints such as primary-foreign keys
But even if these ideas would be implemented, this means manually setting these parameters.
So my proposition is simply a "clone table"' tool that would clone the table from the show create table statement and just allow to specify the destination path (base.table)
Best regards,
Simon
Hi all!
Based on the title, here's some background information: SHAPLEY Values
Currently, one way of doing so is to utilize the Python tool to write out the script and install the package. However, this will require running Alteryx as an administrator in order to successfully load, test, and run the script. The problem is, a substantial number of companies do not grant such privileges to their Alteryx teams to run as administrator fully as it will always require admin credentials to log in to even open Alteryx after closing it.
I am aware that there is a macro covering SHAP but I've recently tested it and it did not work as intended, plus it covers non-categorical values as determinants only, thereby requiring a conversion of categorical variables into numeric categories or binary categories.
It will be nice to have a built in Alteryx ML tool that does this analysis and produces a graph akin to a heat map that showcases the values like below:
By doing so, it adds more value to the ML suite and actually helps convince companies to get it.
Otherwise teams will just use Python and be done with it, leaving only Alteryx as the clean-up ETL tool. It leaves much to be desired, and can leave some teams hanging.
I hope for some consideration on this - thank you.
Hi Team,
As a Low vision person, I am able to work on Dark Background and White foreground (Dark theme).
I won't find the feature, kindly upgrade for the same. I tried the suggestions in google as work with Palette option,
in my case that's not much help. and also kindly make Alteryx as much as accessible.
Thanks & Regards
Rameshchandra
When I work I typically have 2 to 3 screens at my desk, or an oversized single screen. Being able to take the results window and float it on to my second monitor is great as it allows me to view more canvas and more data results in one setup. However the results window will not maximize or dock to my second window, would be great for it to have this Windows feature.
Add the ability in the select records tool to use formulas not just record numbers.
There is no tool that exists that outputs all records that are duplicates (those sharing the selected values with at least one other record) and also outputs the records that are not duplicates (those not sharing the selected values with at least one other record).
The Unique Tool is not sufficient. It only provides the first record of a unique duplicate group along with any non-duplicates and then provides a secondary output that only contains the additional records of a duplicate group. Sometimes you only care about the duplicates and want to quickly see what differs between the unique groups.
For example, if there are 4 records with the City of Austin and I am looking for duplicates on City I want to see all 4 records with Austin in the output so I can quickly compare additional fields to see what might differ, or if they are all indeed truly duplicates.
Many of today's APIs, like MS Graph, won't or can't return more than a few hundred rows of JSON data. Usually, the metadata returned will include a complete URL for the NEXT set of data.
Example: https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/devices?$count=true&$top=999&$filter=(startswith(operatingSystem,'W...') or startswith(operatingSystem,'Mac')) and (approximateLastSignInDateTime ge 2022-09-25T12:00:00Z)
This will require that the "Encode URL" checkbox in the download tool be checked, and the metadata "nextLevel" output will have the same URL plus a $skiptoken=xxxxx value. That "nextLevel" url is what you need to get the next set of rows.
The only way to do this effectively is an Iterative Macro .
Now, your download tool is "encode URL" checked, BUT the next url in the metadata is already URL Encoded . . . so it will break, badly, when using the nextLevel metadata value as the iterative item.
So, long story short, we need to DECODE the url in the nextLevel metadata before it reaches the Iterative Output point . . . but no such tool exists.
I've made a little macro to decode a url, but I am no expert. Running the url through a Find Replace tool against a table of ASCII replacements pulled from w3school.com probably isn't a good answer.
We need a proper tool from Alteryx!
Someone suggested I use the Formula UrlEncode ability . . .
Unfortunately, the Formula UrlEncode does NOT work. It encodes things based upon a straight ASCII conversion table, and therefore it encodes things like ? and $ when it should not. Whoever is responsible for that code in the formula tool needs to re-visit it.
Base URL: https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/devices?$count=true&$top=999&$filter=(startswith(operatingSystem,'W...') or startswith(operatingSystem,'Mac')) and (approximateLastSignInDateTime ge 2022-09-25T12:00:00Z)
Correct Encoding:
Hello all,
Like many softwares in the market, Alteryx uses third-party components developed by other teams/providers/entities. This is a good thing since it means standard features for a very low price. However, these components are very regurarly upgraded (usually several times a year) while Alteryx doesn't upgrade it... this leads to lack of features, performance issues, bugs let uncorrected or worse, safety failures.
Among these third-party components :
- CURL (behind Download tool for API) : on Alteryx 7.15 (2006) while the current release is 8.0 (2023)
- Active Query Builder (behind Visual Query Builder) : several years behind
- R : on Alteryx 4.1.3 (march 2022) while the next is 4.3 (april 2023)
- Python : on Alteryx 3.8.5 (2020) whil the current is 3.10 (april 2023)
-etc, etc....
-
of course, you can't upgrade each time but once a year seems a minimum...
Best regards,
Simon
Add ability to name the columns for the text to column fields tool.
It looks like we can choose which fields to include in a workflow with the Listbox interface + Select tool., but we cannot ORDER or REORDER fields.
I did stumble across this post, it looks like it can be done but it isnt very elegant.
HI,
Not sure if this Idea was already posted (I was not able to find an answer), but let me try to explain.
When I am using Mongo DB Input tool to query AlteryxService Mongo DB (in order to identify issues on the Gallery) I have to extract all data from Collection AS_Result.
The problem is that here we have huge amount of data and extracting and then parsing _ServiceData_ (blob) consume time and system resources.
This solution I am proposing is to add Sorting option to Mongo input tool. Simple choice ASC or DESC order.
Thanks to that I can extract in example last 200 records and do my investigation instead of extracting everything
In addition it will be much easier to estimate daily workload and extract (via scheduler) only this amount of data we need to analyze every day ad load results to external BD.
Thanks,
Sebastian
I hope have a flexibility to adjust the print area workflow.
in the canvas.
it similar to excel print area, so we can adjust all the area easily.
for security. it may add function to check whether all tools is covered in print areas.
it is hard to cut the workflow to pieces when it is huge.
I've used the Table tool with large data sets to make tables with conditional formatting etc. There's a couple of suggestions I'd like to see.
1. I noticed an issue where if you disconnect from the tool prior to the Table tool before it forgets your settings quite easily and you may need to redo them. This is quite frustrating if you have lots of columns
2. The controls for sorting and interacting with columns aren't very good, if they were more like the select tool controls that would be fantastic. Perhaps this could be resolved with a select tool beforehand but I still think it is worth putting on the table tool itself.
3. Render output. when making excel outputs with multiple sheets of varying sizes, its very difficult to control. The sheets all stretch to the largest size. I've found I've had to put in white space in Report Text tools on one side of a table tool in order to make up the space and prevent stretching. (I found that solution on the forums)
Thanks.
Frank
Hi!
Currently, the only visual the user has on which column they have selected in the Results window, is the 3 dots for column options (Data Cleanse/Filter/Sort). It would be incredible if Alteryx would add a border around the entire column that is selected (like you currently do when selecting a whole row) & maybe possibly even bold the header of the selected column.
I think you might be changing the background color from light grey to white, but it's so subtle it's hard to tell. Make it pop!
Connect to PowerPivot data model or an Atomsvc file
It would be nice to have a tool that automatically normalized data, or calculated percentages. This could be overall or in groups.
For example, maybe I have a dataset with 2 columns: US State and Number of amusement parks. So I know the count of amusement parks by state. But maybe I want a distribution so I can see which percentage are in what state. What I want is (# of parks in a state) / (total across all states). Currently you need at least 3 tools to do this calculation (summarize, then join or append fields, then formula). This is a very common operation, and often I want counts and percentages next to each other in a table.
Such a tool could be called "normalize" or "rescale" or "scale". It could be more general - maybe not just normalizing so values add to 1 (or 100%), but to other magnitudes, recentering the data, or doing a "standard normal" (z score) transormation as suggested here:
https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Designer-Discussions/How-to-do-Feature-Normalization-in-Alt...
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |