The Product Idea boards have gotten an update to better integrate them within our Product team's idea cycle! However this update does have a few unique behaviors, if you have any questions about them check out our FAQ.
community Alteryx IO Alteryx.com
alteryx Community
Search
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Close
Free Trial

Alteryx Designer Desktop Ideas

Share your Designer Desktop product ideas - we're listening!
Submitting an Idea?

Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!

Submission Guidelines

Featured Ideas

12

Image Recognition Tools

Status: Under Review Submitted 09-08-2021 Submitted by 09-08-2021

Hello,

 

  After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it : 

  > by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,

  > by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)

  > at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?

 

  Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?

 

  In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.

 

  Thank you again

  Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))

 

  Thank you again.

 

  Kévin VANCAPPEL

Read More
Suggest an idea

Field Index or Position ID

Status: Accepting Votes Submitted on ‎03-30-2015 10:14 AM Submitted by on ‎03-30-2015 10:14 AM
4 Comments (4 New)
Hello All,

Can you add the flexibility to access fields based on its position or index like a[1], a[2],... a[n]. a[1] being the first column. Also an option to get max[a] can give the last column and min[a] give the first column. In this way, we can easily subset the dataset. Most cases, we are handling survey data which has 1000s of columns and when we need to select certain columns, we have to manually select the column checkbox and its painful to select 100s of columns. It will be nice if there is an option to select based on ID or index. It will also be useful while doing multi-field formula with more number of fields, because currently there is no option to write formulaes based on field Name column in it. 

Regards,
Jeeva.
See more ideas labeled with:

Multiple Data Fields in Cross Tab

Status: Revisit Submitted on ‎01-08-2015 08:39 PM Submitted by on ‎01-08-2015 08:39 PM
23 Comments (23 New)

It would be great if you could select multiple Data Fields in a single Crosstab

For example. I would like to SUM (Methodology) Pet Food Sales (Data Field 1) & Baby Food Sales (Data Field 2) By Store (Grouping Field) By Day of Week (Header field).
 

See more ideas labeled with:

Add CountEmpty - CountNotEmpty as Summarize option

Status: Implemented Submitted on ‎12-10-2014 09:24 PM Submitted by on ‎12-10-2014 09:24 PM
2 Comments (2 New)
Currently if I receive a file where fields are empty rather than Null(), the summarize won't count them with the CountNull option. Fairly easy to put a formula right before when there is just a couple of fields and change with an IF IsEmpty() but with a file with a large number of fields and large file size, a multiple field tool eats up a lot of time converting.  Not sure if it would just be trading processing speed in the summarize to do basically the same thing.
See more ideas labeled with:

Additional options to the Running Sum Tool

Status: Not Planned Submitted on ‎11-25-2014 04:09 AM Submitted by on ‎11-25-2014 04:09 AM
6 Comments (6 New)
Can you add some additional options to the running sum tool?  I know this can be done in the Multi-Row formula, but it just takes too long to program and Alteryx is designed for speed and I know it can be done.  Can you add options to average, standard deviation, etc. also with running sum?  And then add a rolling time window on it.  That would be great!

Thanks.
See more ideas labeled with:

Formula mapping from New File

Status: Implemented Submitted on ‎11-18-2014 10:45 AM Submitted by on ‎11-18-2014 10:45 AM
1 Comment (1 New)
Hi ,
Today i stuck in one position where my current module gaves an error because it doesnt found the Fields name. I define the field name in Formula tool for validation and harmonization. So as my Fields changes formula is also changes. But i donot want to make any changes in my Module.

So what i am thinking it will be better that we can define a formula in any file format like (.xlsx or .csv) and take the Input in formula tool.
So we do not have to change the module again and again. We just need to change the mapping file against the lates file coming. So we can check the file and define the formula in mapping file.

Thanks in Advance.
See more ideas labeled with:

SHA-256 Hashing Support

Status: Accepting Votes Submitted on ‎10-10-2014 05:45 PM Submitted by on ‎10-10-2014 05:45 PM
3 Comments (3 New)
Please include a function to support the conversion of data into this secure format.
See more ideas labeled with:

Tool Reordering

Status: Revisit Submitted on ‎02-19-2014 06:43 PM Submitted by on ‎02-19-2014 06:43 PM
3 Comments (3 New)
It would be nice if we could change the tool numbers and effect which one gets done first. If I'm working on a module and I later add some more analysis upstream it won't get done or pulled first since it has a greater number. a simply ability to change the numbers would really make things a lot easier and it will allow the flow of work to flow smoothly visually
See more ideas labeled with:
Labels
Top Liked Authors
View All