Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
I work with data where milliseconds is my saviour when I count distinct the datetime to get number of events. Alteryx ignores the millisecond part (as lots of other BI tool providers - I don't know what is going on with this idea that milliseconds are not needed). Yes I can convert it to string but it's not the best practice to create duplicate fields just so that I have date part for date-related calculation (plotting, time difference) and on the other hand string value for quick and easy counting..
Alteryx can be used to collect manual data input by chaining Analytic Apps together to create a dynamic application.
A specific example is collecting TRUE or FALSE values, from the user, for every record that was generated by a prior workflow. Technically this can be done by populating a List Box with the output from the first Analytic App. (the first picture below shows a dynamically populated list box.)
Alteryx should provide an interface tool that accepts a table of data and allows this table to be edited. Certian columns could be marked as "editable" or "locked" depending on whether edits are allowed for that row.
Here is an example of the existing list tool that can be used to collect TRUE or FALSE values.
Here is the proposed "Table Input Tool" with text input boxes to input more complex data for each row.
Also note how multiple columns would be allowed instead of just NAME and VALUE.
If this is already possible please let me know.
Alteryx Forever!
thanks, Evan
The Text to Columns tool allows for multiple delimeters, such as comma AND tab. It would be great if that capability was baked into the input tool.
I am always coping the open workflow path for various reasons - would love a COPY button right here to copy to clipboard.
Please?
Here's a twist on the iterative macro. Suppose, like a generate rows tool, you could initialize a container to iterate on it's internal processes without having to construct a macro? The container could include anchors for iterations and for output and allow the user to DoWhile inside of the container.
Just a thought....
Often when working on problems posed by other people, they provide a sample table of data.
Would love a trivial way to copy from the Community to Alteryx.
As a security enhancement, the default passwords setting should be encrypt for user. Although this is critical for security my users have overlooked this even with training. They truly aren't culpable if they forgot. If it is the default then they must consciously change the it to an insecure setting.
From a security perspective the current default setting is backwards.
Grant Hansen
Example:
Equipment Id | Type | Clean Equipment ID |
123L | Line | 123 |
123S | Substation | 123 |
S156 | Substation | 156 |
123X | Bus | 123 |
123L6 | Delivery point | 1236 |
If I want to create the 'Clean Equipment ID" I would have to use a complicated RegEx expression. Wouldnt it be easier for the end-user to have a function to do so? Like Exclude(string,character)?
In this case it could be: exclude([equipment id],"ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ") and if I wanted just letters it could be exclude([equipment id],"0123456789").
Currently, the default location for autosaved files is "C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\Alteryx\Autosave". It would be nice to be able to customize, the same way you can for the working directory.
When you use the Visual Query Builder, you can drag and drop tables to arrange them clearly (to show the star or snowflake schema, for instance).
When you close the Visual Query Builder and reopen it, the tables are all left-aligned in a long column, with the joins overlapping each other. Since many of our tables are very wide (i.e., with many columns), this makes it cumbersome to locate the correct table and field.
I would like the manual positioning of the tables to be saved in the Visual Query Builder, to
This is a feature that our users were very accoustomed to in Hyperion Intelligence, our legacy BI tool, which works similarly to the Visual Query Builder (shown below).
Following unexpected behaviour from the Render tool where outputting to a UNC Path (see post) in a Gallery Appliction, on advice of support raising this idea to introduce consistent behavior across all tools where utilising a UNC Path.
It would be very helpful to have a SOQL Edit textbox for the entire SOQL statement not just the WHERE clause. This would allow us to select fields based on parent or child relationships to the table as well.
Sometimes in a crowded workflow, connector lines bunch up and align across the title bar of a tool container. This blocks my view of the title, but also makes it hard to 'grab' the tool container and move it.
Could Alteryx divert lines around tool containers that they don't connect into, or make tool containers 'grab-able' at locations other than the title bar?
Image demonstrating connector line overlap
The introduction fo a rank tool would be hugely beneficial. Whilst there are currently means to rank using a combination of other tools formula/running total/multirow etc... a specific "Rank Tool" would be provide a seemless and smoother way to rank your data either for further analysis or purely to output this field.
This tool should include a sort by and group by functionaility as well as options for ranking (such as dense ranking or unique ranking) and in addition multi levels of ranking (ie. Rank by "Field A" Then By "Field B" etc...).
We encountered an issue with clob data. Looks like alteryx is very slow performing while loading clob data to Oracle database. We need to figure a better way to handle the clob data.
The DateTimeParse function always works if there are leading 0 but if one digit day of month or month it can be harder to parse
Hello, I am very new to Alteryx, so my suggestion might appear elementary for the veteran-users. From the standpoint of adoptation by less technical people (moving from Excel to Alteryx), would it be possible to take common scenarios of Fuzzy Matching and automate them?
For example, if you have 2 databases and you want to match and clean them up, you have to have close to 10 steps, with sorting, adding unique identifiers, joining, fuzzy matching, etc. Just look at your video named "Fuzzy Matching" or other videos for Tableau+Alteryx. They idea is basic. If you know most common use cases and you have already developed a methodology for how to solve these cases, why not have them as part of the tools library?
Also, when matching, for example universities, wouldn't it be easier if all those common, aka appearing many times, words were automatically suggested to be removed from the "match". Example: University A and Univeristy B are two different Universities, but they share the common word "University". While it's important that this word is there, it is not the reason to pair these two together. Maually going through and identifying and typing these common words is an extra step. It would be much easier to have a pop list of these common words and the count of records in which they appear, sorted by the count, and a check box to include or exclude the words.
Thank you,
Olga
Link to the Fuzzy Matching video. Check Minute 9:41.
I have a 3 year license but am required to activate the license key each year. Is it possible to get the activation period matched to the duration of the purchased license? This would not only remove the need to update each year, but would also clarify the actual duration of the licence too.
I would classify this as a major bug.
Using Redshift ODBC connector, if I configure a Pre SQL statement inside an Input Tool, as soon as the Input tool is deselected (white space is clicked in workflow area), the Pre SQL statement executes without even executing the workflow.
e.g. putting a CREATE TABLE statement as pre SQL will create the table prior to the workflow being executed.
There should be no reason for the Pre SQL statement to execute until you are ready to execute the whole workflow. If there is, then the Pre SQL statement should be done outside of Alteryx.
Please change Alteryx to NOT execute Pre SQL until workflow is executed
I'm in a situation where IT has to install all my updates, so I always forget if I have Admin or non-Admin installed.
It would be nice to have that info onthe "About" screen within the software itself.
Had to get on a live chat with support today to get the secret decoder ring to figure it out.
Let's put it where it makes more sense and is easier to find...
Let's put it where it makes sense and make it obvious!
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
8 | |
7 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |