MM-DD-YYYY hh:mm:ss TZ.
This is to allow log monitoring applications to process the file correctly.
Thanks
Mike
Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
This is a low priority one, but I constantly find myself wanting to do this and it seems to be both an easy fix and something which should exist anyway.
I have ten input tools, I want to be able to highlight all, right click and select "add all browses" or something similar.
That's it. Nothing earth-shattering, nothing deeply insightful, just something that would brighten up my day and maybe save a bit of time.
Thanks.
Greenplum is a new in-db capability; which our company has started using frequently. GP is a distributed database, across many nodes, much like how Redshift and other new database technology works.
In order to properly use these databases the Alteryx tools MUST have a way to distribute our tables across the nodes how we desire. Currently the tools for In-DB will distribute by the database default (almost always taking the first column in the table to distribute) which has terrible affects on performance. The work around has been to run SQL outside of the Alteryx tools to run ALTER TABLE DISTRIBUTE BY statements for all tables; also this cannot work on TEMP tables as those tables are created and deleted at the end of the workflow.
The idea I want is an additional option for Distributed DB's to choose the distribution column OR choose the "RANDOMLY" option for distribution of tables [DISTRIBUTED BY statement]. This would make my DBAs very happy and make it possible for me to run even more challenging requests to my system.
As far as I know, in the current version (Jan 2018) of Designer the presentation settings for the canvas are global and are set by the user in the Canvas settings tab of the User settings. There appears to be no way to adjust canvas settings at the individual workflow level that would over-ride the global defaults. (Please tell me if I am wrong).
I propose that the user defined global defaults be retained but that the workflow configuration window include a new tab where local settings can be set. This tab should include a button that enables a user to reset all local settings to the global defaults.
Sometimes the field names for an imported file are very unhelpful. Consider the image below as an example. Even though the AUTO FIELD tool has been applied to this imported CSV file it is still necessary to inpect the source data before assigning field names and descriptions.
MY SUGGESTION: insert a data preview column in the Configuration view between SIZE and RENAME. This data preview column would show the first row of data but a scroll function would allow the user to advance to the next or previous record within this view. This feature would enhance the productivity of analysts in the data preparation phase of their work.
Hi,
I am working on a macro that has multiple listboxes and xml tree controls in it and the listbox controls have a feature in the top right to select all or none, effectively allowing you to clear any entries you had made and start fresh. In the tree control, there is no such feature but it would be nice to have instead of having to remember and go through and find all the entries you had made to start fresh.
To the point of the macro interface, when developing and testing using the interface designer, you are able to 'reset' the interface using a button at the top of the left pane. It would be nice if that was available in the macro interface at run time. And that would solve the issue with the tree control in one step.
Thanks,
Dan
Dear Alteryx Team !
When running an app the actual Analytic App Progress window is not very informative and can not help to know where do we stand in the process.
In order to improve that issue, it would be very nice to give the hand to developers to let them choosing which message should be display in the progress window.
Minimal need :
Optimal need :
Many thanks
Arno
After you've saved a file from the Browse tool, a popup window appears to confirm the file saved. That popup window contains an image off text that you can't copy/paste.
I recommend turning that text into a hyperlink so users can just double-click on the popup window to open the file they just created. Or add another button to "Open File" next to the "OK" button. This would eliminate the need to go find the file you just created.
Thanks for your consideration
The Explorer Box is great for embedding help documentation into workflows. That being said, there are several text-based file types that cannot be accepted into the Explorer Box such as .sql or .log. Since these are essentially text files, I'm suggesting that the Explorer Box should be less strict regarding file extensions and allow all text-based file types to be viewable.
Looking forward to be able to select one of the available fields from a drop-down menu when populating a filter tool...
I would like to suggest a Canvas Mode: Can you make a feature where it is possible to maximise/full screen the canvas only (so that it pops up in a separate window)? I work on two screens so it would be handy to have the tools and ribbons with the results preview on one screen and a pure canvas designer on the other.
Kind regards,
NN
Hi Team,
Is there a possibility of a Alteryx Public Designer similar to Tableau Public software?
Regards,
Diptesh
I love the basic data profiling that is now available in the Browse tool. I used to rely more on the browse everywhere feature and only used the current Browse tool at the end of my workflows. Now with the data profiling capability, I am using a lot of Browse tools for in-line analytics while I am developing workflows, but they cause an overwhelming amount of clutter! To help ease this clutter, I use containers to hide/disable them, and I usually delete most of them when I am done developing each part of a workflow.
I'd live to have a mini browse tool with a small icon that includes the basic data profiling functionality present in the current Browse tool. I would also like to have the option to disable all 'mini Browse' tools without disabling all of the Browse tools.
I would like to suggest adding in additional options to the Output tool for running VBA code after inserts finish.
Similar to how the "7 Post Create SQL Statement" works for "ODBC" or "Oracle" Connections, having this option for excel would be game changing.
Our current processes rely on us calling a .vbs script, or manually formatting our output.
My job of automation would be significantly easier if this was an option.
Getting deliverable ready in an easy to digest format is key.
I think Alteryx needs to first determine if the output file if there (if it's supposed to be) or not there (if it's not supposed to be) vs running for X number of mins and then coming back with an error message that the file doesn't exist or already exists - depending on your setting for output. It should ping all input and all output files and determine if an error will occur there before running the workflow. IMHO.
In regards to the little ALTERYX box that pops up every time I run my YXWZ file..
This is COMPLETELY ANNOYING! I don't want to click the dang thing every time to close it. It has ZERO VALUE. I already know its ALTERYX. SO LETS LOSE THIS WASTED STEP! I have to run this many times when testing and for production, WHY DO I HAVE TO CLICK IT EVERY SINGLE TIME TO CLOSE IT!
I have a second suggestion... I tried to enter this suggestion, AND I KEEP GETTING A SNAFU because the IDEA LABELS feature in your submit tool. LOSE IT or make it so I don't have to fill it in. I get you want to somehow CATEGORIZE, but, if you can't come up with something useful, I am not a mind reader and I don't have time to sit here and figure out WHAT MIGHT BE THE MAGIC WORD that might be associated with my idea. GIMME A BREAK!
Thanks
I suggest adding a piece wise linear regression tool to the predictive tool set. Many times, modelers in the insurance business (and others) like to play around with the model, i.e. placing knots/splines at multiple intervals then after seeing the results, changing where those knots are placed. This gives the best fit based not only on mathematical technical knowledge but also domain/tribal knowledge, especially when training data sets are small.
Currently, we have to try and develop our own model matched with a macro which changes the r-code. To date, there has been no luck, but maybe the Alteryx excellent customer support would get the developers to do this for us and then...........we could finally bury SAS in the ground.
Our company got Alteryx server a few months ago, and we were surprised to find out that (at current setup) the members of my team can not collaborate on workflows published on our Server.
What we would like to see (How we envision being able to share workflows).
With any published workflow on the server, be able to publish a workflow to a shared space and/or share owner permissions with or edit abilities to with another user.
And
Allow another authorized user to download, edit, and update those workflows - keeping them current in someone's absence (Vacation or leave for a new job).
Please build this functionality so we can get back to using Server instead of a shared folder on the network.
Thanks,
Randy
Hi,
Can the Log format be changed, so that each line starts with
MM-DD-YYYY hh:mm:ss TZ.
This is to allow log monitoring applications to process the file correctly.
Thanks
Mike
Allow Workflow Dependencies to run other tools or workflow .
Would like a component to analyse an incoming dataset and suggest a key for the data, i.e. detect what field or composite of fields would uniquely identify a record in the data. The key could then be detected by the output data component and add primary key's to tables when created. Great for when using the drop and recreate option, i.e. would retain an index on the key.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
26 | |
9 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |