Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
When testing an app, I always use the Debug Mode.
However, if I have any files in the app that are using a relative reference (and are not being updated by the app), they continue to have that relative reference in Debug mode. But in Debug Mode, this Debug workflow is located in a totally different computer location that my app - C:\Users\username\AppData\Local\Temp
So when I try to run the workflow in Debug mode, it can no longer find my files that used a relative reference path.
Can you make it so that when you are in Debug mode, the relative references are changed to absolute references so the files can be found? I find it really inefficient to have to either:
1 - repoint my files that have a relative reference to their locations so they can be found when the workflow is run
2 - save the debug workflow to where the app is located so the relative reference works.
Thanks
I think it will be useful if I have an option to add field description when new fields are being created (eg. formula tool, transformation tools etc.)
The case for this is I tend to create a lot of calculated fields by combining fields and applying transformations for exploration predictive possibilities, I want to capture description of the fields while they are being created (its not always possible to set the names descriptive enough)
As of now I think I can add description using select tool but that's not optimal
Thanks,
Option to add a description for each newly created filed in all data preparation and transformation steps. Although a description can be added in the select tool but that's an additional tool in already cluttered (most workflows).
My use case for this is I tend to create a lot of fields (dummy, interaction and transformation) for predictive modelling to come up with a best model. I can not always name the same filed in such a way that is descriptive enough but I want to capture my thought on why I created a particular field right when I am creating it.
Thanks,
Ashish Singhal
It would be very helpful to be able to export your entire workflow to a poster-sized paper, either in paper or PDF format. When explaining a workflow to others, or getting feedback, the ability to see the entire workflow or lay it out on a table is very helpful
We just updated to 11.7 from 10.5.
The Container adding/removing rules were changed somewhere in there and the change made it much harder to remove tools from containers. Is there any way to undo these changes or look into a better set of rules to use?
Nick
Hi,
I understand that we can find tools that uses formula by ctrl+F.
I wish we can find text and replace the formula like excel does.
Sincerely,
knozawa
It would be a timesaver for workflow documentation if macro metadata could be passed through to the workflow where the macro is deployed. The image below suggests that the Description encased in the macro could be copied across to the corresponding Annotation panel. I would also suggest that the Meta Info panel have a checkbox to control this new funtionality.
It would be great if there was a way to convert datatypes within the Table Reporting tool. The specific example that sparked this idea is calculating percentages so they are shown in the report with the decimal place moved over. Today, within the formula tool I need to calculate the percentage and then multiply it by 100 in order for it to display the way I'd like in the report. However, if I need to leverage this percentage for another formula I most likely will have to divide the percentage I calculated first by 100 before I continue my calculation.
It would be nice to not have to multiply by 100 to move the decimal place over 2 spots and instead use the table tool to convert the number into a percentage we're all used to seeing. I'm thinking something similar to excel where you can click percentage, currency, etc to convert your number.
It would be very useful to have a new Grid selection question type. This would allow you to see a grid of data that you can sort and pan through and make selections. Similar to a multi select but in grid form with multiple columns.
The "Open Example" feature that has been implemented for many tools helps new users quickly learn how to exploit Alteryx. I would like to see Alteryx make further investments in this area and in particular I would like to see enhanced and organized documentation for functions with more and better examples. I would encourage Alteryx to engage its ACE community and the other advanced users who are active in the Community to contribute to this effort.
Often when we need to use the Filter tool and select the Custom filter option, it requires us to write conditions such as "IF", "OR" and so on.
Was hoping if some suggestions or hints could be embedded in the custom filter for those of us who have no experience even in basic coding.
When I save records out of a browser tool, an info window appears when the file is finished saving. Please add a hyperlink to that window that will open the newly saved file. This should work the same way as the hyperlink in the Output message window.
Similar concept to how when you right click on a folder, computer icon, or file in windows. When you right click on any of these things you are able to pull up a properties link/tab which gives you relevant information and path of the file location.
For this particular idea the properties tab will give information on the Alias, such as server type, connection type; ie microsoft provider or oracle provider, etc.
This would be helpful not only to go back and understand why you choose that connection type, but also when training others.
Thank you
When you have a complex workflow and you need to identify what happens to a specific field throughout a LONG workflow, it would be great to have the paths, connections, etc highlighted.
If the field is modified in a tool (formula for instance), the tool gets highlighted in orange. If it just passes through a tool, it is highlighted in green and a tool where it gets dropped is colored red.
This will help in identifying which tools modify a field of interest as well as identify tools which "deselect" a field and cause it drop out. I spend a lot of time tweaking workflows developed by other analysts, so this will greatly speed up troubleshooting and assessment time.
This can be a simple add on to the sample tool or possibly a separate tool. This would give you the ability to select which row the Header row(and use field values for header) and/or data starts. This is particularly useful if someone has extra rows with report titles and information, etc. This tool could also select rows to skip, ie blank rows in matrices or rows that do not contain data.
This is a low priority one, but I constantly find myself wanting to do this and it seems to be both an easy fix and something which should exist anyway.
I have ten input tools, I want to be able to highlight all, right click and select "add all browses" or something similar.
That's it. Nothing earth-shattering, nothing deeply insightful, just something that would brighten up my day and maybe save a bit of time.
Thanks.
Greenplum is a new in-db capability; which our company has started using frequently. GP is a distributed database, across many nodes, much like how Redshift and other new database technology works.
In order to properly use these databases the Alteryx tools MUST have a way to distribute our tables across the nodes how we desire. Currently the tools for In-DB will distribute by the database default (almost always taking the first column in the table to distribute) which has terrible affects on performance. The work around has been to run SQL outside of the Alteryx tools to run ALTER TABLE DISTRIBUTE BY statements for all tables; also this cannot work on TEMP tables as those tables are created and deleted at the end of the workflow.
The idea I want is an additional option for Distributed DB's to choose the distribution column OR choose the "RANDOMLY" option for distribution of tables [DISTRIBUTED BY statement]. This would make my DBAs very happy and make it possible for me to run even more challenging requests to my system.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
17 | |
10 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 |