Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Would love to have a 'common used' tab, rather than a favourties box (as that lags what I am currenty using).
Would be nice to have it look at my usage and create sort by frequency of use table. Could also be done with all users as well (some kind of opt-in telematary data?).
At work I use a laptop and two external monitors. (L, EX1, EX2) <- that's how it's set up
When working in Alteryx I put my main window of Alteryx on EX1 and Results/Configuration tab on EX2
Sometimes I need to unplug my laptop, go to the meeting - or, what I have been doing lately, go to one of the meeting rooms and use standing desk to work there.
Problem is when I disconnect my laptop from the docking station (where external monitors are connected) other windows "jump" to the laptop screen, apart from Alteryx external tabs - meaning I can't "reach" it, even if I disable/enable or restart Alteryx.
It's not really a complaint of any sort but just a discussion if there is a way for this to be improved?
When a tool container is disabled, I'd like the lines that are going into it to be different from "enabled" lines.
They could be grey or dotted for example.
When working on a workflow and disabling containers, I find that the lines entering disabled containers become confusing or cluttering. It would be much simpler to focus my attention efficiently if lines that remain enabled could be distinguished quickly.
When you perform an "insert after", you have to navigate directly to the tool. Not the end of the world, but if I could search through this list, it would be much quicker to do this function.
Another way of achieving this is when you add a new tool to a canvas - if you drag it on top of an existing tool the designer could ask "do you want to add this after (taking over all connections) or before; or connect the regular old way.... That way, the existing search woudl work.
Hi there,
As we all know - the Alteryx toolbox is along the top of the screen, and it takes up quite a bit of real-estate.
Can we give the users the ability to pop this into a vertical tree on the left hand side like in RapidMiner or Visual Studio? This will free up screen space, and the search box can then move directly into the top of the tool tree (which lessens mouse movements on every search)
Alteryx
RapidMiner
Visual Studio 2017
When opening a saved workflow in Designer, the python tool does and jupyter notebook do not load, and instead displays a "404: Not Found" error. This is resolved by refreshing the meta-data (or running the workflow). But the message is confusing and would ideally be handled differently.
I have often thought it would be nice to have a 'predicted run time' for a module calculated.
An adequate prediction might be the complete run time last time the module ran. Then, in combination with a counter of how long a module has been running so far, we’d be well armed to estimate whether to go get a cup of coffee or not.
Before 2019.3, you could edit the default annotation that Alteryx generated, but now if you go to change the annotation it's either 100% your own annotation or 100% the default annotation left by Alteryx.
I found it useful to retain a portion of Alteryx's default annotation (e.g., a long table name when setting up a database connection) while being able to cull the superfluous portions (e.g., didn't want to see the Source / Catalog). Now, if I want to retain the Table name I have to type it out.
Sometimes I just want to see the tool names without the annotations. Currently the options are Hide, Show, Show with Tool Names, but there doesn't seem to be a way to just see Tool Names without annotations.
I really like the ability in 10.0 to turn on and off certain tool categories and specific tools within a category to keep your toolbar clean.
What would really take it to the next level is allowing users to manage them like bookmarks in a broswer - let me create new custom groups and add anything to them, or move tools among groups.
The favorites method lays the foundation for this, but is limited in that everthing is on one group. Using the method I suggest, users could basically have groups of tools tailored to specific analytic tasks.
Normally I have no issue with the splash screen but I've found with analytic apps that the splash covers up the App dialogue box.
I'm aware that you can click on it to hide it but having the option to disable it (even just for apps) would be great.
Many times we create and work on multiple workflows that are similar or are tied to the same project, but when it comes time to save them we must save each workflow as an individual file.I think it would be great if we can mimic what MS Office/Tableau have done; allow user to save multiple tabs or reports/dashboards under the same file. It would be great if Alteryx will allow us to create multiple workflows under the same workbook which can be renamed, be tied to their own workflow schedules without having to be saved separately and can be tied under the same 'project' or 'workbook'.
I cannot seem to create a vertical or horizontal tab group of workflows. This feature used to exist in prior versions and I think it disappeared in 2018.3, the release with the revamped UI. Is it just me or is this feature gone? I do still see it in the current documentation.
You can select all fields at once, but it'd be nice to select a chunk of fields using CTL+Shift+Click
I really like the new toolbar & tool palette. I think that the toolbar would be improved by a couple of (hopefully) minor tweaks:
1) The ability to 'lock' the Favorites toolbar so that it is always visible, no matter how far you have to scroll
2) The ability to move tool sets within the toolbar so that those less used are further off to one side
I just upgraded to the new Alteryx 8.6 which I'm looking forward to using, however, it is quite frustrating that none of my customized user settings are maintained during the install process. I make a few customizations:
And there are so many other customizations that I don't go near (but might if they were maintained during upgrade), like:
Please implement a way of maintaining these settings!!
Modify the taskbar icon while according to workflow status to provide a visual queue when workflows are running/completed, like the SAS running man or the Teradata sunglasses... The Alteryx A could be going places.
I would like to see a Full Screen View under View on the Menu Bar. Once selected your workflow would show full screen with out all the other side and bottom windows. You could leave just the Menu bar showing so the workflow could be ran. This would be nice for presenting/teaching. Also, maybe have it default to cntrl 0 so the entire workflow is showing. Zooming in and out could still be done. Then to Exit. Go back to View and uncheck Full Screen. This would be easy and, I think, helpful.
It would be nice to have the annotations that a user gives a tool with a different background color on the canvas than those tools where the annotation is being automatically populated. Example would be the user gives a tool a specific name that shows up in blue but the formula tools that display the formula preview under the tool show up in yellow.
Let's say I have an Input tool and a Browse tool connected in my workflow (Picture 1). I drag and drop another tool between them, it's fine (Picture 2).
Now I have a Select (or any other tool) connected to the Input tool but not to the Browse (Picture 3). So now my input tool has two output connections.
I want to add a tool, let's say a Filter tool after the Input but to both connections. If I drag and drop the Filter tool where connections are together just after the output anchor of the Input tool it insert the tool only within one of the connection (Picture 4).
The idea (and you might have guess by now) is to automatically add the new tool to all output connections when it is dropped near the output anchor of the a tool present in the canvas.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
7 | |
5 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |