Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Hello Alteryx Gurus -
I've got some workflows that run daily, but there are times, depending on the breaks, wherein I don't get any data from one of my data sources. Which is actually fine, nobody did Job X today. But it makes Alteryx puke out and I get an error message emailed to me. Ultimately, I've got to hop into the rather voluminous log entries to determine if this was a data stream not initialized / was empty error, or something else that I actually need to care about.
That being said, in the coding realm, it is relatively simple to look for specific flavors of exceptions and then just eat them without notifying people. So, why not add something to the runtime / events panel for emailing at error time to allow for ignoring data stream not initialized errors? In this way, I could get notified when there is a real error I need to pay attention to, and not get notified when there is no new data, which isn't really that big a deal.
Thank you for attending my TED talk on enhanced error reporting and exception classification capabilities.
I guess it's better if the current column filter feature would cover the entire data set not just the partial results. This would be useful especially if after you run the complicated workflow and you just want to test the data particular nodes in the canvass.
It really would be great if Alteryx supports the 'set' data type.
I often have situations where I really wish I could make a field with a data type of "set".
For example, I have a table of pets owned by each person.
The "Pets" Field would be perfect if it could be processed as a "set" type.
Person | Pets |
John | Dog, Cat |
Susan | Fish |
(I sort the pet values in alphabetical order, and concatenate the string values using the summarize tool. This is the best I could think of)
Hello Alteryx, Please fix Salesforce Input and Output tools.
The input tool has a lot of issues with Login , , Custom SQL, Json issues, Machine Encryption, and saving to the gallery , .
Unable to use Crew macros with Salesforce input Workflows etc.... there is a lot of post's with all the issues with Salesforce V.1 Versions.
The performance profile option outputs a list into the results window. It is difficult to check the tools and continuously scan back to the profile. Make it easy! Put the times and percentages in the connection progress tooltips of all the tools.
I would like to know the run time user for workflows in Gallery. Possibly changing the run time username in the gallery. I know we could include the credentials at workflow save to gallery but that means I have to open the workflow and change the credentials.Also, we could change the worker process to be run with certain credentials I will have to be admin to be able to do edit worker process setup.
Thanks
We have to run the full workflow at a time, if you can please think of something like partial running of the workflow and also while designing the flow if we add new tools, we have to run the entire flow again.
Why can't it hold the intermediate data to avoid re-running the entire code.
Hi,
I think it would be great if the run time of a workflow could be displayed by tool or container. This would make refining the workflow at completion a lot easier and also help with thinking of better solutions. Even cooler would be some kind of speed heat map.
Thanks
During development it seems the syntax checker or whatever process runs behind the scenes after a tool is modified reviews the full workflow.
Ex - Just from observation if I modify the file name in an output tool I don't see why it would rerun the full syntax check process.
This reduce the time waiting to continue development.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
11 | |
8 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 |