Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Add in-database tools for SAP HANA.
Please star that idea so we can prioritize this request accordingly
Alteryx is unlike many BI tools in the sense that it joins NULL. It is difficult to think of another platform that has this behaviour. Either people know about this and work around it or they don't and their joins are a ticking time bomb. Please add a check box to the Join and Join Multiple tools to allow or prevent joining NULL. This will serve to remove the need for workarounds as well as educate users about this default behaviour.
(originally raised as discussion : https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Data-Sources/Input-Data-Tool-Record-Limit-control/td-p/58718)
Hi all,
When using a record limit on a database query - the actual query being executed on the server depends very much on the connection type (Native SQL; OleDB; and ODBC). However, for all 3 of these, it seems that the record limit is being enacted on the client side, not on the server. What I mean by this is that when I take the exact queries that are being run by Alteryx on the server (by looking at a SQL Profile trace on the server), and run these in a query window, you can see that the row-limit is not occurring in SQL, but in Alteryx.
(to test this, I ran several queries with and without the record limit; profiled them using SQL profiler; and the profile trace was identical either way)
Aside from putting "Select top(100) from..." in all the queries that that we create, or using in-DB queries for every simple query - could we instead have an option to force the row limitation down to the server on a regular InputData tool, so that we can take advantage of the server's ability to optimize?
Thank you
Sean
The guide line of Shape File is below. They recommend that you use only letters and numbers.
"Spaces and certain characters are not supported in field names. Special characters include hyphens such as in x-coordinate and y-coordinate; parentheses; brackets; and symbols such as $, %, and #. Essentially, eliminate anything that is not alphanumeric or an underscore."
But many GIS tools can read and write 2 byte field name at Shape File.
(e.g. QGIS https://qgis.org/en/site/index.html)
And Esri Japan says Shape file can use 2 byte field name.
https://www.esrij.com/gis-guide/esri-dataformat/shapefile/
We want to use 2 byte field name at Shape File on Alteryx Designer.
(e.g. UTF-8 , Shift-JIS )
Thanks,
Kajitani
When the append tool detects no records in the source, it throws a warning. I would like to have the ability to supress this warning. In general, all tools should have similar warning/error controls.
In Alteryx enable connections to Oracle Databases that are configured to use External Authentication.
This should allow Alteryx workflows to connect to Oracle databases using different authentication mechanisms, e.g. Kerberos.
Please see this discussion for some analysis on what would be required in Alteryx to support Oracle Database External Authentication:
Essentially this would involve Alteryx allowing users to specify that a connection to an Oracle database will utilize external authentication.
Then when connecting to an Oracle database with external authentication, Alteryx would pass the relevant parameter to Oracle to indicate external authentication is required (and Alteryx would not pass user name and password info). Then authentication with the Oracle database would be controlled by the external authentication configuration on the computer running Alteryx.
For more information on Oracle Database External Authentication see:
Hi,
I would like to have something similiar to in SSIS called as Sequence Container implemented in Alteryx. A sequence container would ensure that the process flows in a particular order. Lets say I would like to read 3 different files having different schema each and I want to read/validated it in particular order. I don't see any tool that would help me do this.
I would like to see more files types supported to be able to be dragged from a folder onto a workflow. More precisely a .txt and a .dat file. This will greatly help my team and I do be able to analyze new and unknown data files that we receive on a daily basis.
Thank you.
My specific use case relates to writing to AWS but am sure there are many other use cases for federated user session token support.
Specifically, using the S3 Upload tool or Athena Bulk Write (via SIMBA and Athena ODBC), the configuration works when using a IAM user, access key, and secret access key but when using a federated user via Okta there is no option to enter the session token and authentication fails.
Alteryx desktop should support federated users' session tokens.
Add the option to flip comment boxes, so they can be read down-up, instead of left-right... (see below in red, how it looks and how it could be).
I would love to see a detailed change log to help when I encounter issues after upgrading from one version to the next. For concrete examples, I've come across these issues recently:
1) Files saved to %TEMP% were displayed to the end user in the 10.0 but not 10.1 when running in the gallery.
2) The cross tab in 10.1 would run with a warning if you had column heading of "p_d" and "p d" where the space in the latter item is changed to a _ and then one of them is renamed with a 2 at the end ("p_d" and "p_d2"). In 10.5 you now get a warning and an error and the workflow stops. I've attached a sample workflow.
I'm all for bugs getting fixed and the improvements not always being backwards compatible, but I struggle with some of these when I can't reference a detailed change log. For some context, I've also attached a change log from some other software I used in a previous life. Anytime that a change in coding could affect past results, there was a note in the change log to identify these changes to the end user.
Currently, the default location for autosaved files is "C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\Alteryx\Autosave". It would be nice to be able to customize, the same way you can for the working directory.
It would be great if you could create default settings for the Tool Containers. As workflows become larger, I use containers a lot. But once I have 10-15 containers, I have to set all of them to have a Transparency of 1 and a margin of None. While the changes don't take long to make, it would be nice if they could be preset.
I know there's the download but have a look at that topic, the easiest solution so far is to use an external API with import.io.
I'm coming from the excel world where you input a url in Powerquery, it scans the page, identify the tables in it, ask you which one you want to retrieve and get it for you. This takes a copy and paste and 2 clics.
Wouldn't it be gfreat to have something similar in Altery?
Now if it also supported authentication you'd be my heroes 😉
Thanks
Tibo
Everyone knows the importance of adding the appropriate controls and governance to your workflows - and often, this means including events that will generate notifications if a workflow is running with errors.
But who is the audience of that email? If it's not a developer, will that person know what they are reading and where to focus?
How about a developer that would like to customize the message that the end user will receive?
Porting some existing functionality from other tools in the Alteryx toolkit to the Events page could easily provide added flexibility to event generation:
1) Add a formatting bar to the tool like shown in the image below
-- Style changes
-- Alignment
-- Highlighting
-- Coloring
-- Images
2) Add a function bar to the tool like shown in the image below
-- Ability to view all available variables
-- Ability to apply formulas using variables
-- Ability to save formulas
What do you think? Give this post a thumbs up if you find the post helpful!
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |