Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Often I want to output an Excel-file with a dynamic filename, e.g. part of the filename is from a date field in my data set.
E.g. before the output tool I could add a column with "Filename" and use that in the output-tool (including path).
The tool default could be to use the first record as reference, but if the Filepath differs in each record,
there should be an option to output as many files.
Essentially my idea is to add a connection similar to an optional Macro Control Parameter to the standard Input and Output tools that would respond to a basic formula result like "True" / "False" so that we can conditionally toggle on and off the Import and Export Tool itself within a workflow. This would solve the Alteryx problem of conditionally disabling Inputs and Outputs to avoid output errors, avoid input / output timing errors under different record # loads or when no data is present in a given routing configuration, add a ton more flexibility for complex workflows and reduce runtimes.
Ideally this approach could also be used for entire containers to actually disable all of the contained Inputs/Outputs at once within a standard non-macro workbook.
Enable multiple sheet selection for excel
When using Dynamic Input with databases, the Database may be returning errors or other information that the tool cannot parse into a dataset.
It would be great if we could see the 'raw' response from the database somehow, as this might provide insight into why we are not getting the expected results.
If the tool could output an optional error column that has the unparsed response from the database server, it might allow us to debug the problem ourselves.
If the returned data is actually a string response from the database, but one that is flawed in some way, we might still be able to parse data out of it to 'ride over' the error.
For heavy workflows (e.g. reading massive amount of data, processing it and storing large datasets through in db tools in Cloudera), a random error is sometime generated: 'General error: Unexpected exception has been caught'
This seems due to Kerberos ticket expiration and the related setting may not be modifiable by the Alteryx developer 'especially when GPO). Suggestion is to enhance the indb tools in such a way that they are able to automatically renew the Kerberos ticket like other applications do.
Br, Lookman
Salesforce Input tool throws a conversion error if labels are longer than 40 characters:
Could the the size of the field be increased to whatever the the Salesforce maximum is, or at least be configurable from the tool configuration.
Particularly annoying is that the conversion error cannot be ignored (as seen in the Union tool) but will continue to show the result as yellow in the Scheduler. We like to keep a green board!
Hello, I noticed today when changing the database that my connection string is linked to that Alteryx Designer did not require my password to be reentered. See below: This is the initial state of the connection string:
Notice that the database ends in "...-dev" and there is an encrypted password embedded in the string. So far, all that is fine because that's how I set it up. However, I typed a different database to end in ...-dev-data-migrations" in the string (while keeping the same server) and expected to be prompted for the password again, but the connection was made with the existing password and I was not prompted to reenter it (see below):
While this is convenient, in my mind this represents a security problem because someone could set up an associate with a connection and only want them to be able to access that server, db connection, but might inadvertently be allowing them a connection to any other database in the same server that happens to share the same password.
This is all the more risky considering it's standard practice to wipe out the password to a saved connection whenever there's a change to that connection. These are standards in Microsoft SQL Server Management Studios, Oracle SQL Developer, and most likely many more. I would even go so far as to say it's an industry standard to wipe the password whenever a change is made. It's even standard with other elements of Alteryx Designer. In the data sources quick connect window, you're unable to change the database after a connection was made to one database using SQL Authentication as is shown below:
Notice the existing user name and password combination only allows the one single database connection.
I think it makes sense to change this so that the password is wiped out whenever any change is made to the connection.
Hello Alteryx, Please fix Salesforce Input and Output tools.
The input tool has a lot of issues with Login , , Custom SQL, Json issues, Machine Encryption, and saving to the gallery , .
Unable to use Crew macros with Salesforce input Workflows etc.... there is a lot of post's with all the issues with Salesforce V.1 Versions.
I work in an enterprise that uses Active Directory to manage database access. When I connect to MS SQL with Alteryx, I can use a string like:
odbc: Driver={SQL Server};Server=XXXX;Trusted_Connection=yes;
When I connect to Oracle using a 32 bit OCI, the string looks like:
32bit:oci:USER/__encryptedPW__@HOST.XXX
This is problematic because my password must be changed every two months according to company policy. I have to update any workflow that uses the Oracle connection. It would be grand if I could use AD for Oracle and for any Alteryx connection the way I can for MS SQL in the first instance.
I am using Designer 2019.4.8.22007. This version has the new Input tool experience. When I create a connection to 32 bit OCI, that connection stays in the Recent list. After a while, it disappears, replaced by files and other things. When I need it, I have to go and create it again. Can you please persist connections? Thank you.
Hello,
I am using google analytics connector (v7.0.7) with alteryx designer version 2019.4. I am using online option to sign in and able to extract required dimensions and metrics but when it gets disconnected, I have to select everything again.
That would be very helpful if I can simply save my settings with selected dimensions, metrics and segments etc.
Thanks
Hi
1:
I'm from Denmark, and like several other european countries we use commas instead of dot as decimal seperator. And we use dot as thousand seperator.
So if im working in a flow with loads of price fields, lets say cost price, amount per unit, amount and amount including vat i need to do a multi field replace. Else I dont get the output i can work with in excel or other programs.
So it would be great beeing able to set seperators on a flow level, like you can in excel when importing.
2.
Beeing able to set a date format on a flow level.
Lets say my input data is 12.12.2019 and i need 2019-12-12 in my output. If i work with several different date fields i need to use several datetime fields.
Alternate could be a multi field datetime ?
3.
Having a search function when using the select ? And maybe a numbers order.
So if i scroll down, i could enter 3 - which means this would now be my 3. shown field?
Dummy/garbage text is required in the "Write to file or database" field to be able to write files from fullpaths using the "Take File Table name from field" check box and dropdown (also horrible UX/UI IMO). Without which you get a uninformative "Cannot access the folder" error message.
This isn't obvious and makes no sense and should not be required. The User experience here is very unintuitive, can you review this component?
Currently, if the same Excel file is being updated on the workflow, but different sheets within the file, it will error out if the saving process overlaps one another. And there are some cases that using the tool Block Until Done will not work because there are two data streams (for example if you have a filter and is saving the data from the two outputs on the same file).
It would be great if we could output to the same Excel file more than once on the same workflow.
Hi,
It would be very useful for me If I could consolidate in the same output two different inputs: 1- the whole output flow; 2- The summarize from the output. That would save some time from doing pivot table analysis for instance.
Thanks
Currently if I read multiple files through Directory Tool +Dynamic Input, I will not know which final records is from which file, which can be extreme useful.
I also know, the files need to be the same schema (a second limitation), but the filename itself will be handy
One feature in the input tool that would be great to have added to the already existing "Output file name as field" option would be to set the field at the beginning of the data set or end (i.e. you could set your default, click a check box or select from two options). Because with large data sets sometimes you need to do data manipulation on that field and it can be easier to work with right away if at the beginning of data set. Right now you have to drag in a select tool to fix it.
Dear Alteryx Community,
I've tried my best to make sure this suggestion wasn't posted before so hoping I haven't missed a feature already present in Alteryx or re-posting an idea already submitted.
In any case, there is one operation I do so much that I wonder if it could be made easier. I would consider myself a very basic Alteryx users so many of my workflows usually end in either Excel files, CSV, or Alteryx Database files. In any case, here is what I would love (if possible)
In my workflow, I wish I could Right-click on my Output Tool using a file-based output such as Excel, .csv, .yxdb and have a R-Click menu option which said "Start Workflow". This would open a new Workflow with one input tool already present with a the path being the same as what was in the Output tool that I right-clicked on.
So many times I create an output and then need to use that output. This usually means I have to copy/paste the path, create an Input Tool and paste that path in. Would be so many easier if a few of these steps could be done automatically.
Otherwise, if the community knows a simpler/better way...I'm would love to know.
Thanks in advance
Amar
Would be interested if it was possible to turn off individual output tools individually rather than also disabling tools that write output, as it would be good to choose which output tools can write output, instead of placing them in a tool container for all of the output tools.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
32 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 |