Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Variations of this concept have been discussed in community since 2016. Alteryx is awesome right up to the point where we need to see our files in ArcGis Pro or ArcGis Online. The shapefile is painful. We have to rename every field in ArcGis Pro with over about 10 characters because all of the field names are truncated. Yes- you can make a shapefile and a text file from Alteryx, then join in ArcGis Pro, but its a million clicks and its not a good solution. Shapefiles are limited to 2GB, which is not great either, but the field truncation is super frustrating.
In fact- rather than making an output file, I bet it would be easier to make a tool that connects to the ESRI API. Everyone gets stuck on passing the spatial field because its like a giant text field with all of the instructions to create a point, line, or polygon.
Does anyone have the software engineering chops to make this happen? :)