Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
When I maximize the SQL Editor Window within the Input Tool only half of the screen show the SQL window. The bottom half of the screen is useless grey space. Why not have most all of the screen be the SQL window and only a small portion of grey border for the Test Qry, Ok, Cancel and Help button? I'd like to see more SQL and less wasted space. Thanks!
When using the Levenshtein distance matching in the fuzzy match it gives you the option to select a match threshold % but does not allow for other options. Is it possible to provide these additional options in a future release?
Similar to the regular formula tool, it would be great if we would be able to configure multiple text to column processes within one tool rather than having to line up several tools when having to convert various fields of different logic at the same time.
Currently there are bulk loaders within alteryx for Teradata, Oracle and SQL Server.
It would be great to have a bulk loader for AWS Redshift in order to fully industrialize the workflow instead of using AWS S3 and then use a separate AWS Datapipeline for scheduling
StreetGeocoder when finds an address returns its fields in CAPITAL CASE which is no good for showing to user. Can it return in a correct title case? AFAIK, source data are in valid title case, but the tool or data preparation team make a standardization which actually makes all letters capital.
When city is not provided StreetGeocoder tool returns the first one in alphabetical order associated with provided ZIP code. For example, if you submit "380 New York St, 92373" the geocoder will return you "MARIGOLD, CA", instead of Redlands, CA which is the primary place name for 92373 ZIP code.
So if an address has multiple city names within the geocode table, can we provide the recommended city name?
Hey Alteryx Devs -
Simple fix that would keep me in the flow sometimes, is if I could hit F2 and get to a place where I could tweaky tweaky the annotation. I keep on finding myself hitting F2 and then am annoyed that I have all these extra clicks to annotate meaningfully. Easy fix and you don't have anything else attached to F2.
Thanks!
brian
edit: Had wrench palette, needed pencil palette!
Problem:
Currently, the scheduling via designer controller is independent of the gallery. So, even after a canvas is deleted, the scheduler still continues to execute the cached version of the canvas, as long as the scheduler exists.
Note, this issue does not occur when the canvas is directly scheduled in the gallery, and only occurs when you schedule via the Designer on the controller directly.
Steps to replicate issue:
1) Publish a canvas into gallery
2)Schedule the canvas to run daily via the Designer --> Options --> View Schedules --> Select Controller --> Create new workflow and schedule
3) Delete the canvas from gallery
4) You will notice that the canvas is still getting run on the defined schedule, even though you have deleted the canvas
Observed in Alteryx 11.5.1
Idea Recommendation:
Golden copy of a canvas should be the version existing in the gallery. Once the gallery instance of the canvas is deleted/replaced with a new version,
Instead of counting the number of occurrences of the delimiter and then specifying it is there a way to split column for:
1. Every occurrence of the specified delimiter?
2. Only the last occurrence
3. Only the first occurrence
Thanks,
I've added a table tool that also has the bar graph enabled. The data I'm basing the bar graph off of is set to 5 decimal precision, but the bars round to the nearest whole number, making the feature essentially pointless in my scenario. Is there a way to have the bars dynamically adjust to the amount of decimal precision? I'm guessing most folks are exporting their data to a viz tool and not many folks are using the table tool in this context.
I asked this before. WHY DO WE HAVE TO HAVE A POP UP WINDOW OPEN UP EVERY TIME WE RUN ALTERYX?! I asked this before, and the comment was made, "there is a check box to turn it off in the settings." Yes, that is true, there is a checkbox! And guess what, to my surprise (insert sarcasm here), IT DOESNT WORK! THE MOST BASIC, EASIEST THING YOU CANT GET RIGHT, and that is EXTREMELY ANNOYING.
Just LOST THE INTRO WINDOW. WE ALL KNOW ITS ALTERYX WHEN WE OPEN IT, DO YOU NEED THAT MUCH MORE ADULATION THAT I HAVE TO CLOSE A WINDOW THAT REMINDS ME THAT I AM USING ALTERYX?!?!
Maybe I should send an email to alteryx to remind them I am using their product, will you feel even more important then? Pardon that slam here in my nastygram, but this is JUST AMATEUR!
A multi billion dollar company, and youre wasting effort with this. GEEZUZ
In the Table/Query edit window, the datatable "frame" needs to do a better job of vertically autosizing to the window - it overruns the vertical space and then, if you have a lot of fields in your table and you want to see and/or select the fields in the table, you have to adjust the parent window's scrollbar to see the fields. I think it would be better to shrink the table's window and use the table window's scrollbar because the table fields update as you scroll so it's easier to follow.
Some Alteryx tools, like Select, update when a field name or data type is changed upstream. Sometimes it causes an error, but often Alteryx can self-adjust and be OK. However, other tools such as Union and Summarize, don't recognize the change - they don't self-adjust or throw an error until runtime. It would be great if these other tools (there must be others besides Union and Summarize) could recognize changes at design time. Even if they just threw an error, it would be better than current state.
Is it possible to have a Sum(Column) or Total(Column) functions in formula tool? it will make the calculations much better as we don't need to use "Sum tool + Append tool + Formula tool + Select tool" or "couple of formula tools and then a select tool".
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
8 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |