Bring your best ideas to the AI Use Case Contest! Enter to win 40 hours of expert engineering support and bring your vision to life using the powerful combination of Alteryx + AI. Learn more now, or go straight to the submission form.
Start Free Trial

Alteryx Designer Desktop Ideas

Share your Designer Desktop product ideas - we're listening!
Submitting an Idea?

Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!

Submission Guidelines

Featured Ideas

Very simple. Use the wheel button on the mouse to reconfigure connections between nodes. You click on the origin or end and drop into the new anchor point.

PLEASE add a count function to Formula/Multi-Row Formula/Multi-Field Formula!

 

I have searched for alternatives but am just confused about how to store the result for the total number of rows from Summarise or Count Records in a variable that can then be used within a Formula tab. It should not be that difficult to just add equivalents to R's nrow() and ncol().

When workig on a module with many tools, and one of those tools is the Allocate Input tool (Experian US), whenever you try to access or configure that other tools, there is a delayed reponse.  I'm assuming because the Allocate data set is so large.  But, it would be nice, if possible, that when accessing/configuring other tools you did not get that delay.  My workaround is to Container the Allocate tool and disable it.  
As there is a DateTimeFirstOfMonth() Formula function is there any reason why there is not or could not be a DateTimeFirstOfWeek() equivilant.

Thanks,
Joe

In the Report Map tool, I'm locked from changing the 'Background Color' menu, and the color appears to be set to R=253, G=254, B=255, which is basically white. 

 

However, when we use our TomTom basemap, we see that the background is actually blue, despite what's listed in the Background Color window.  (This goes beyond the 'Ocean' layer, and appears to cover all space 'under' the continents and ocean.)  Since we oftren print large maps of the east coast, this tends to use a lot of blue ink.  I've attached a sample image to illustrate this.

 

My solve to-date has been to edit the underlying TeleAtlas text file and change the default background (117 157 181) to white (255 255 255).  Unfortunately, we lose these changes with each data update.

 

Could Alteryx unlock the Background Color menu, and have it affect the 'base' layer, underneath oceans and continents in TomTom maps?  Not sure how it might affect aerial imagery.

Hi All,

when we create formulae or filters in Alteryx, it would be great not just to

have the option to include fields (by their names) in the formulae but
also have the option to include specific values from the fields right from a drop-down menu.
 
E.g. if I have a field called ‘Region’ with 5 values like (Africa and Middle East;
Europe; etc.), filtering the database for these individual values of ‘Region’
would be simpler if I could just select the values themselves from a drop-down
list. I have now the ‘variables’ small tab in the formula configuration window but
every time I have to type the value after selecting ‘Region’== from the variables.
This is annoying with long field values - you have to be careful with pronunciation.

If a simple right click or a new tab in the configuration window would list me the values
of the field (e.g. only if a categorical variable - it can list the top 10 most frequent values),
it is simpler to write the formula.

Thank you,

Laszlo
Hi All,

Not sure if there is already tool like this, if not, it would help to have a test data generator.

It would be a combination of data type and nature of data. For e.g. Person Name whose meaning is self explanatory and is a string. Similarly phone number which is numeric but would be different than sales amount.
This can help save time during the development and QA phases when real live data might not be available and team would need to mock up such data for testing the code developed.

It may be driven by either some sort public databases like Government provides portals/APIs or internal alteryx maintained dictionary data.

An advanced step to this might be data generated by purpose. Say even inside Person name data would be different when testing a plain use caae vs master data management use case.
it would be good if this was supported among the conenctors, I can connect via third party ODBC (paid) driver but it's not really as user friendly as I'd like, I'm sure you guys would do a much better job of building a connector (hoping flattery will push help push this idea up a little 😄 )

Chris

randomForest

 

 

Random forest doesn't go well with missing values and create gibberish error results for Alteryx users.

 

Here are two quick options better to add the new version;

1) na.omit, which omits the cases form your data when tere a re missing values... you loose some observations though...

 

na.action=na.omit

 

2) na.roughfixreplaces missing values with mean for continuous and mode for categorical variables

 

na.action=na.roughfix

Best

 

I would like the parse tools (regex, split to columns...) to by defualt, not point at any column.

The parse tools need to be pointed at a column, however they by defualt configure them selves to point at the first column. Every time I use them, I enter the other configuration options, such as a regular expression, then hit run. After hitting run, my output column will be populated with only null values yet I will recieve no error. 

The reason for this, is 100% EBKAC (error between keyboard and chair), as I have forgotton to point the tool to the correct column, and instead its looking at the defualt (first column)

If the defualt option didnt exist, or was blank, the tool would then error telling me to think about what im doing and point the tool to the correct column. 

I believe this change in the tools defualt behaviour would save hours of debug time, wondering why my regex statment isnt working, when in actual fact im just looking at the wrong column. 

Hello,

The Data source window allow severla kind of connections like quick connect, ODBC, etc. But the order is not the same and this is confusing :image.png


Best regards,

Simon

Here's a great idea and one that would save me ALOT of pain.

 

Can Alteryx validate that all of the inputs are valid before it begins to run a workflow?

 

For example, I am running a workflow that takes 4-5 mins to run each time, but it will only tell me that a file is missing or a connection is invalid when it needs to read that particular file/input (this could be one of the last tools to be read). What would be amazing is to have all the inputs checked first and then run the workflow.

 

Love you guys

 

@LordNeilLord

Part time Tableau, Part Time Alteryx. Full Time Awesome

Currently the select tool can reorder data by sorting or selecting the field and then clicking the up or down button.  This is tedious when you have a data set with 400 fields.  I suggest you add a drag and drop functionality to the field list to facilitate reordering data.

For the Output Tool it would be very beneficial to be able to pass a password in order to populate a password protected Excel spreadsheet. It appears there is a decent amount of interest based on the Community feedback pertaining to the subject.

Please have Alteryx check the status of any output files for read-only or locked status.  This change would prevent processing a file for an hour then having the process fail because the file was open or had improper permission. 

Idealy, the output tool should ask the user what to do rather than fail and lose all the work.

I would like the ablity to view the processing order of tools within module prior to processing and if needed reprioratize which tool processes first/last.  It would also be great to have the ablity to disable a subset of tools within a module prior to processing.

Create a new module that outputs statistics after processing. For instance creating a table of all used modules by reference number with fields for records input, records output, processing time, processor load, memory used.  As well as starttime, endtime, username, hostname, etc.  This would make debugging quite a bit easier, expecially if the results could be output to Excel.

Hello,

Unless you're lucky, your input dataset can have fields with the wrong types. That can lead to several issues such as :
-performance (a string is waaaaaaaay slower than let's say a boolean)
-compliance with master data management
-functional understanding (e.g : if i have a field called "modified" typed as string, I don't know if it contains the modification date, an information about the modification, etc... while if it's is typed as date, I already know it's a date)
-ability to do some type-specific operations (you can't multiply a string or extract a week from a string)


right now, the existing tools have been focused on strings but I think we can do better.


Here a proposition :

entry : a dataframe
configuration :
-selection of fields
or
-selection of field types
-ability to do it on a sample (optional)


Algo :

AlteryxByteboolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 to be done
AlteryxInt16boolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 to be done
AlteryxInt16Bytemin=>0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxInt32boolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 to be done
AlteryxInt32Bytemin>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxInt32Int16min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxInt64boolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 to be done
AlteryxInt64Bytemin>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxInt64Int16min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxInt64Int32min>=-–2,147,483,648, max <=2,147,483,647to be done
AlteryxFixed Decimalboolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 to be done
AlteryxFixed DecimalByteNo decimal part, min>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxFixed DecimalInt16No decimal part, min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxFixed DecimalInt32No decimal part, min>=-–2,147,483,648, max <=2,147,483,647to be done
AlteryxFixed DecimalInt36No decimal part, min>=-––9,223,372,036,854,775,808, max <=9,223,372,036,854,775,807to be done
AlteryxFloatboolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 or 0,-1to be done
AlteryxFloatByteNo decimal part, min>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxFloatInt16No decimal part, min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxFloatInt32No decimal part, min>=-–2,147,483,648, max <=2,147,483,647to be done
AlteryxFloatInt36No decimal part, min>=-––9,223,372,036,854,775,808, max <=9,223,372,036,854,775,807to be done
AlteryxFloatFixed Decimalto be doneto be done
AlteryxDoubleboolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 or 0,-1to be done
AlteryxDoubleByteNo decimal part, min>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxDoubleInt16No decimal part, min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxDoubleInt32No decimal part, min>=-–2,147,483,648, max <=2,147,483,647to be done
AlteryxDoubleInt36No decimal part, min>=-––9,223,372,036,854,775,808, max <=9,223,372,036,854,775,807to be done
AlteryxDoubleFixed Decimalto be doneto be done
AlteryxDoubleFloatwhen no need for doube precisionto be done
AlteryxDateTimeDateno hours, minutes, secondsto be done
AlteryxStringboolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 or 0,-1 or True/False or TRUE/FALSE or equivalent in some languages such as VRAI/FAUX, Vrai/Fauxto be done
AlteryxStringByteNo decimal part, min>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxStringInt16No decimal part, min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxStringInt32No decimal part, min>=-–2,147,483,648, max <=2,147,483,647to be done
AlteryxStringInt36No decimal part, min>=-––9,223,372,036,854,775,808, max <=9,223,372,036,854,775,807to be done
AlteryxStringFixed Decimalto be doneto be done
AlteryxStringFloatwhen no need for doube precisionto be done
AlteryxStringDoublewhen need for double precisionto be done
AlteryxStringDatetest on several date formatsto be done
AlteryxStringTimetest on several time formatsto be done
AlteryxStringDateTimetest on several datetime formatsto be done
AlteryxWStringboolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 or 0,-1 or True/False or TRUE/FALSE or equivalent in some languages such as VRAI/FAUX, Vrai/Fauxto be done
AlteryxWStringByteNo decimal part, min>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxWStringInt16No decimal part, min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxWStringInt32No decimal part, min>=-–2,147,483,648, max <=2,147,483,647to be done
AlteryxWStringInt36No decimal part, min>=-––9,223,372,036,854,775,808, max <=9,223,372,036,854,775,807to be done
AlteryxWStringFixed Decimalto be doneto be done
AlteryxWStringFloatwhen no need for doube precisionto be done
AlteryxWStringDoublewhen need for double precisionto be done
AlteryxWStringStringLatin-1 character onlyto be done
AlteryxWStringDatetest on several date formatsto be done
AlteryxWStringTimetest on several time formatsto be done
AlteryxWStringDateTimetest on several datetime formatsto be done
AlteryxV_Stringboolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 or 0,-1 or True/False or TRUE/FALSE or equivalent in some languages such as VRAI/FAUX, Vrai/Fauxto be done
AlteryxV_StringByteNo decimal part, min>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxV_StringInt16No decimal part, min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxV_StringInt32No decimal part, min>=-–2,147,483,648, max <=2,147,483,647to be done
AlteryxV_StringInt36No decimal part, min>=-––9,223,372,036,854,775,808, max <=9,223,372,036,854,775,807to be done
AlteryxV_StringFixed Decimalto be doneto be done
AlteryxV_StringFloatwhen no need for doube precisionto be done
AlteryxV_StringDoublewhen need for double precisionto be done
AlteryxV_StringStringSame lengthto be done
AlteryxV_StringDatetest on several date formatsto be done
AlteryxV_StringTimetest on several time formatsto be done
AlteryxV_StringDateTimetest on several datetime formatsto be done
AlteryxV_WStringboolonly 2 values. 0 and 1 or 0,-1 or True/False or TRUE/FALSE or equivalent in some languages such as VRAI/FAUX, Vrai/Fauxto be done
AlteryxV_WStringByteNo decimal part, min>=0, max <=255to be done
AlteryxV_WStringInt16No decimal part, min>=-32,768, max <=32,767to be done
AlteryxV_WStringInt32No decimal part, min>=-–2,147,483,648, max <=2,147,483,647to be done
AlteryxV_WStringInt36No decimal part, min>=-––9,223,372,036,854,775,808, max <=9,223,372,036,854,775,807to be done
AlteryxV_WStringFixed Decimalto be doneto be done
AlteryxV_WStringFloatwhen no need for doube precisionto be done
AlteryxV_WStringDoublewhen need for double precisionto be done
AlteryxV_WStringStringSame length,latin- character onlyto be done
AlteryxV_WStringWStringSame lengthto be done
AlteryxV_WStringV_Stringlatin- character onlyto be done
AlteryxV_WStringDatetest on several date formatsto be done
AlteryxV_WStringTimetest on several time formatsto be done
AlteryxV_WStringDateTimetest on several datetime formatsto be done

 

The output would be something like that

FieldInput typePropositionConversion
totofloatintformula (with example)/native tool/datetime conversion tool…



Best regards,

Simon



From a user standpoint there’s not a good reason for these locations to not be linked.

My idea is essentially to borrow the keybinding/command ethos of Vim for Alteryx. For those who are unfamiliar, Vim is a text editor from a time before the mouse and the GUI became dominant forms of interacting with PCs. I think the key ideas to take from Vim are the Modes, Commands, and Grammar.

 

Vim is mode based for its typing. You start out in Normal mode and enter other modes through key commands. For example, to enter Insert mode, you just type 'i'. This mode allows you to enter text into whatever file you have open at the moment. There's also the Visual mode which is for highlighting sections of text for processing with other commands. This means that key commands can take on a variety of meanings in different modes, adding depth in a limited key range.

 

The Grammar is another key aspect. Rather than hold an arcane combination of modifiers and letters, Vim uses an Operator-Count-Motion approach. The operator will be the primary action: y for yank/copy, d for delete, c for change, v for visual select. The Count is how many objects you want this operator to be applied to. The Motion is where and what you want to work with: w for a word, s for a sentence, p for a paragraph, ( for a set of parentheses, b for brackets. There are also options that extend this so you can have a series of commands like d2w (delete 2 words), di( (delete inside parentheses), yap (yank/copy all of a paragraph), etc. Below is a cheat sheet displaying a wider list of the possibilities with the motions.

 

0edc98b0-6f9f-4a17-8d9f-7a9655cd9fbe.png

 

The Command mode is the last piece of the puzzle. By typing ':' while in Normal mode, you bring up a command prompt. Here you can enter any of a number of commands including changing user settings via keywords. For example, :s/old/new/gc will search through my file and attempt to find and replace every old term with the new term, the c at the end means that Vim will ask for confirmation before each change. I could also do things like :set nohl which will turn off highlighting for items found during searches. It's easy to imagine using similar functionality to make configuration changes to a wide set of tools or simply to selectively delete tools without using the mouse or scrolling to them.

 

To take it a step further, current menu functions could be turned into commands, imagine typing v6t to select the next 6 tools on the canvas. You could follow this by typing :Contain %V to wrap the selected tools in a container, perhaps with extra arguments a specific color palette could be applied as well! I say all this to say that the way forward for shortcuts in Alteryx is to break away from the one-handed modifier heavy paradigm that so many programs follow today. By creating commands that can duplicate the actions found in drop down and right click menus, as well as providing a means of navigating the canvas without a mouse, Alteryx can go to the next level in terms of efficiency and ergonomics.

 

Let me know what you think, if you need more concrete ideas on what this might look like in practice, I can add that. Thanks!

 

P.S. If you work on side projects outside of Alteryx, consider giving NeoVim a try, it adds a lot of extensibility and customization to classic Vim

Top Liked Authors