Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
I utilize the Workflow Events quite a bit, but the standard options fall short in a few critical cases.
For example: I use the events to send me an email after the workflow runs with errors.
Usually that is all I need. But, I have run into a few situations where the workflow didn't run at all - thus, no email was sent.
One such instance was on our server. While still initializing (before it even hit tool #1) the job hung. It sat like that for over a day before I noticed that there were no jobs running through a particular worker at all and saw this one sitting there.
A second such instance was recently when I changed Persistence Options and accidentally deleted the source for a scheduled job. The workflow marked itself complete in the scheduler and gave an error message of "Corrupt: Internal Error in PersistenceContainer......"
I realize that these are unexpected events and application errors (which I've worked with support on); but it would add great value to have that fallback mechanism to let us know the error happened.
Understandably, it would probably take a lot of work to engineer a schedule monitor that would catch this - but I think it would be worthwhile.
One option to do this: have an Event to email or run a command if a workflow hasn't started within a certain grace period after its scheduled time.
Could Alteryx create a solution or work around for their tools to retry the queries with Azure DB connectivity outages.
If there are intermittent, transient (short-lived) connection outages with cloud Azure DB, then what action can we take with Alteryx to retry the queries.
Examples of retry Azure SQL logic:
“2. Applications that connect to a cloud service such as Azure SQL Database should expect periodic reconfiguration events and implement retry logic to handle these errors instead of surfacing these as application errors to users”.
SQL retry logic is a feature that is not currently supported by Alteryx.
For further information please see [ ref:_00DE0JJZ4._5004412Star:ref ]:
Hi Alteryx Support,
We are experiencing intermittent errors with our Alteryx workflows connecting to our Azure production database with Alteryx Designer v2018.4.3.54046.
Is there anything we can do to avoid or work around these intermittent / transient (short-lived) connection errors, such as, changing the execution timing or the SQL driver settings.
Or can we incorporate examples of retry Azure SQL logic:
“2. Applications that connect to a cloud service such as Azure SQL Database should expect periodic reconfiguration events and implement retry logic to handle these errors instead of surfacing these as application errors to users”.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-develop-error-messages
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-connectivity-issues
Salesforce Import process, which contains 25 Workflow modules, completed with errors on:
Mon 25/02/2019 23:27
Error 1
2019-02-25 23:11:23:
2.1.18_SF_MailJobDocument_Import.yxmd:
Tool #245: Error opening connect string: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server: Login timeout expired\HYT00 = 0; Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server: Invalid connection string attribute\01S00 = 0.
Error 2:
2019-02-25 23:26:31:
2.1.25_SF_ClientActivityParticipant_Import.yxmd:
Tool #258: Error opening connect string: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server: Login timeout expired\HYT00 = 0; Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server: Invalid connection string attribute\01S00 = 0.
Salesforce Import Workflow completed with errors on:
Wed 27/02/2019 23:24
Error 3
2019-02-27 23:06:47:
2.1.17_SF_MailJobs_Import.yxmd:
DataWrap2ODBC::SendBatch: [Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]TCP Provider: The specified network name is no longer available.
Regards,
Nigel
Hi,
With multiple Workflows open, I'd like to be able to grab one of the Workflow tabs and drag it out on to the desktop. This act would then cause a new Alteryx Window to open up with the Workflow that was pulled out. Just like when you have multiple tabs open in I.E. and you drag a tab out and drop it on the desktop - you end up getting another I.E. opened up and the tab you dragged out is in the newly opened I.E.
This would be handy because I'm often wanting to copy/paste tools, formulas, etc. and it would be nice to do that w/o flipping from one tab to another.
I know I can right-click and open another Alteryx but when opening several - they all open in the same one.
Thanks,
Brad
While challenge 41 was fun to calculate weekdays between 2 dates, there should be a formula similar to networkdays in excel to do the same function
I've come across multiple requests for help that relate to dates. Having to know that "2016-05-04" is the only way to get May 4th, 2016 into a date field is sometimes a challenge for new users. When they begin to use date functions and now have to learn adding and trimming etcetera the complication factor increases. Then we date time format and have to do all of this in English (my one and only language), makes me think that there is room for improvements.
Despite being an Alteryx user for 2 and a 1/2 years this is something I have only recently came across but it does not appear that you are able to use debug mode appropriately with macros.
What I mean is, I have a macro input which drives a series of drop down boxes. In debug mode my drop down boxes will not populate. Now I understand why, Alteryx doesn't know what the input is so it doesn't generate the meta data for the debug mode drop downs.
What I suggest Alteryx do is automatically convert your macro inputs for file browses for the purpose of debug mode (I had to do this myself manually and it was a tedious task, not only to set up but then maintain two separate versions, one essentially an application and one a macro).
Or, by default debug mode uses the macro input data to run through debug mode as.
Ben
One of the most common causes for Admin trauma for our central Alteryx Gallery team - is dealing with drivers that may not be on the server; or a particular worker; or on a designer.
What we're looking for, is for the Alteryx team to maintain a packaged set of drivers as a single installer - which we can download at the same location as the Alteryx designer / server versions.
This would allow us to have 1 version of all drivers across ALL designer clients; as well as on our workers and servers.
CC: @rijuthav @jithinmony @HengHe @RajK @ydmuley @revathi @Deeksha @MPistone @Ari_Fuller @Arianna_Fuller @JoshKushner @samnelson @avinashbonu @Sunder_Sriram @Rahul_Thakur @Rahul_Singh
While Alteryx does have a UNION set operator, it only currently has an Inclusive Union
the other two set operators, Intersect & Except, and an exclusive Union would be helpful if they can be added.
Intersect is particularly helpful for operations like looking at multi-column reference data to see if any fields at all have changed (like a slowly changing dimension).
CC: @rijuthav @jithinmony @HengHe @RajK @ydmuley @revathi @Deeksha @MPistone @Ari_Fuller @Arianna_Fuller @JoshKushner @samnelson @avinashbonu @Sunder_Sriram @Rahul_Thakur @Rahul_Singh
Hi! I noticed that there is currently no way to use the debug function when working on an analytic app workflow that contains control containers. I'm running 2024.1 and I use the debug feature in my workflows that currently do not have control containers for me to troubleshoot when data changes in a dynamic workflow. Currently, when running in test mode, I have no way to review the data step by step in the flow when selected dynamically through the interface apps. I can only view the final output and make tweaks.
When building an Alteryx Macro - one of the tough parts is that the input data you put into the Macro Input is used for testing, but you cannot set the type.
So for example - I want to test with the value 1, and Alteryx automatically assumes this is a Byte.
However 1 is just a useful test value, but I need this to be an int 64.
Can we provide the option to strongly type the macro inputs - this way, we can give advanced users the ability to control the type on Macro Inputs, and not run into this sort of issue with test data implicitly defining the type?
Note: this is similar to the idea here:
Can a function be added to the Text-to-Column tool that allows selecting "split on entire entry" or "split on entry-as-a-whole" for the delimiters field?
Background:
Currently if we type vs. in the delimiters field, it'll look for each character separately including spaces.
The recommendation in the tool help is to use RegEx for splitting on whole words, but for some, RegEx is quite intimidating and adding this function would be a big help for new users.
Proposed Change:
2 Radio Buttons added to the Text-to-Column tool
Example of function:
Thank you!
Functions such as Year([Date Field]), Month([Date Field]), and Day([Date Field]) would really help with date-based formulas and filter tests.
While the result window allows sorting and filtering, every time the user switches to another tool within the same run, the configuration is lost. It would be good if there was a 'Retain" button so that the user does not have to keep setting this each time the tool is switched or when the canvas is retriggered.
I'm testing out the new Data Connection Manager (DCM) and think it needs 1 enhancement based on the way we'd use DCM. Whenever Alteryx opens, it should sync the Data Sources/Credentials from the Server. This is critically important when sharing these with more than 1 user when a password needs updated.
For example, DesignerA updates the password in the source system, and then updates the password in their Designer DCM settings. In order for this new password to get synced to DesignerB, 2 things have to manually happen: DesignerA would need to sync the new password to the server, and then DesignerB would need to sync the new password from the server. I can live with the first part where DesignerA needs to sync to the server. It's just part of the password update process. The second step though seems perilous. DesignerB should get the new password without having to do anything; as things currently stand, DesignerB will have the old password until they manually intervene and sync the password. Imagine a scenario where it's just DesignerB, but hundreds of people who would all have to sync their credentials.
I also think this idea makes sense in light of the way Data Connections currently work (pre 21.4) where a similar sync happens automatically every time alteryx opens.
It would be oh so nice to be able to copy a container's properties and paste those formatting options onto other containers. It could be accomplished through a Paint Brush icon on CTRL-Copy and Right Click to paste format. either way it would save setting the Color (multi-step select), Margin, transparency.
Cheers,
Mark
Credit to @pgdelafuente in his post Export Variables from Assisted Modelling Feature I... - Alteryx Community
This came up in a call with a large client - basically there's no easy way to output the feature importance plot, the accuracy metrics of the selected model (i.e. root mean squared error, correlation, max error, etc.). I would assume this is an easy addition into the Assisted Modeling tools, and perhaps useful for some of the Predictive tools!
After I type something into the filter box, I should be able hit enter and then it just applies my change (ie enter hits the apply button). It used to be this way, but it's not working as of 2021.2. This feels like a very tiny move in the wrong direction. Currently enter does nothing. It looks like if I hit tab twice and then enter, it finds the apply button. I shouldn't have to hit tab twice.
While Alteryx allows for a proxy username and password in the settings, these are not passed properly to an NTLM proxy. Support for NTLM authentication would be incredibly useful for a number of corporations who utilize this firewall setup.
We currently have to either download via Python or cURL through batch commands called by Alteryx. Since Alteryx uses a cURL back-end, this should be a fairly simple addition to the existing download tool by allowing a selection of proxy server, port, and authentication method in addition to the proxy username and password. This could be done either in the tool itself or in User Settings.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 |