Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Imagine We have following o/p fields like Name,RegNo,Mark1,Mark2 ,total
Here total can be computed and can be brought as derived field using formula tool.
However Name and RegNo will be the same in O/p too.
Thanks,
Krishna
Hi Team,
For a small workflow the current setup is okay to handle but with big workflow where input file count comes 25 at multiple locations then it is difficult to check every input.
The idea is: There should be some mechanism to check input/output before running the complete workflow
Once this done the workflow can do further processing.
From my experience, this will help to improve work process and time to fix the issue.
Ashis Sanpui
Please consider displaying the count of records identified by the tool in the image of the tool on the workflow screen.
This will save time when analyzing data: I will no longer need to copy and paste the values into a comment. The value will be "captured" because I tend to print these particular work flows as pdf's.
Thanks,
Nick
Can we have an Alteryx environment that is like a free sandbox similar in nature to Tableau's Tableau Public? It will really help people wanting to get Alteryx certified prepare for certifications without paying the expensive AUD7,795. Please help the jobseekers who would like to pick up Alteryx but cannot afford your hefty price tag just yet.
Dummy/garbage text is required in the "Write to file or database" field to be able to write files from fullpaths using the "Take File Table name from field" check box and dropdown (also horrible UX/UI IMO). Without which you get a uninformative "Cannot access the folder" error message.
This isn't obvious and makes no sense and should not be required. The User experience here is very unintuitive, can you review this component?
I'm really struggling with the documentation/examples and the UX around node configuration. I often will spend an hour or more trying to solve really basic issues despite looking at the examples.
Sifting through relevant threads on the forum is a chore.
A link to a subforum or even better a wiki subtopic would be helpful, placed beside the Open Example link in the top ribbon.
eg
I love the ability to setup the UI with the different windows (results, config etc) in the places that I want. However, once I have them setup I generally don't want to move the positions much again, resize windows in place, yes, but not move them all together.
I would love the ability to lock the window configuration in place so accidental drags on a title bar doesn't move the windows stay in place. I still want to be able to resize those windows in the space though.
Cheers
Hello Alteryx Dev Gurus -
I made an event to email me when there was an error at run time. But I did not populate the 'To' field. (I know!) The process borked soft and shows as an error in the results queue when a customer noticed there was no data. This is one of the simple ones.
Thanks!
I still see that companies are expecting BI professionals to write SQL queries manually despite Alteryx giving complete solution. Idea is to spread value add of Alteryx in Indian market and global companies
I would love to have the ability to easily populate an entire schema of tables into my work space without having to perform repetitive connections to individual tables.
Ideally, this would include the ability to drag a schema onto the workflow and have all of the connection tools auto-populate.
I often have a need to investigate data in many tables to verify its presence / validate the table contents. This would be a very helpful feature for completing this easily and completely.
Thank you!
When reading a SharePoint list with the Input Tool, it does not bring in any columns that are set as "Managed Metadata". Can the tool be updated to include these?
Cisco, which has been building enterprise networks, and is literally close to the Internet of Things, is creating some data products, perhaps a platform, perhaps a suite, to handle big data. Part of their offering is DNA Data Virtualization (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/enterprise-networks/dna-virtualization/index.html). Compare Cisco at 75,000 employees to SAS at 15,000.
I am using 2 or 3 displays set up to be more productive with most of my work. If only we can have snap-on features in Alteryx that support for the windows to be able to snap on multiple displays, not just floating.
The problem with floating windows is they are not correctly aligned for the full-frame and some require custom resizing. to make it worse, some floating windows interchange in their resolution due to multiple resolutions of the display and the non-snap floating windows (configuration, results etc.)
While there are ways to accomplish using multiple tools, it should be a pre-setting within the dynamic input.
Default setting should be TopLeft vs TopCenter for Comment Tool. If you have 10 comment boxes in a workflow: 9 will be comments or instructions or notes and will be TopLeft and one will be the Title and it will be Center. I always find myself having to change to TopLeft or Center. TopCentered instructions, notes and comments can be hard to read.
This isn't a huge issue, but when I have multiple workflows open, I continuously find myself trying to save it by right-clicking on that workflow's tab. I then realize I have to go up to file and click save. Would it be possible to add that save feature on individual tabs? That just makes more sense in my mind!
If we have similar workflows within the gallery saved and we need to make slight changes in the process to all of them, it would be helpful if we could open all workflows from the gallery by either mutliselect or using a checkbox next to those workflows that we wish to open all at once.
As an Alteryx developer building ETL workflows for Salesforce, I want to use the successes and errors from a Salesforce Output tool in a workflow to feed other tools in the same workflow.
I think it would be great to introduce something like Ghost Input Data tool. The tool would refer to an Input Data tool that is used in the same workflow multiple times but is placed far from several other tools it needs to be connected to. This way the data would have to be loaded once and annoying and distracting connecting lines can be avoided.
I use the same 2 saved expressions across 58 workflows (and growing).
I'd like to know that I am using the universal expressions, so that I know that it is the latest version and that I am not missing an update.
Is there somewhere on the Configuration panel that can show the name of the expression in use?
Thanks,
Karen