Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Submitting this idea from a different category as I couldn't find an appropriate category.
I think that it is important to have an offline documentation in either PDF or HTML format (or both) with each major release (or minor release where new features are introduced, such as Alteryx Designer 2025.1.2) for at least the on-prem products (such as Designer and Server) for the use cases or scenarios where either internet connectivity might be limited or non-existent or the user might want to access a part of the documentation quickly (especially in PDF format though searching from the index, where one wouldn't have to navigate between web pages).
Problem:
In large Alteryx workflows, renaming a column using a Select tool (or similar) causes downstream tools like Formula, Filter, Join, Sort, etc., to break or throw errors if they reference the old column name.
This means every time a column is renamed, I have to manually go through every tool that used the old name and update it - which is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone.
Proposed Enhancement:
Add a feature to automatically propagate field name changes across all tools in the workflow that reference the renamed field.
This could work similarly to how modern IDEs allow you to "rename variable" across an entire codebase, or how refactoring works in platforms like Tableau Prep or Power BI.
Benefits:
Saves time when making structural changes to data schemas.
Reduces human error caused by missing updates in some tools.
Makes workflows more scalable and easier to maintain.
Improves usability and development speed for all users, especially in large or collaborative workflows.
You've built a workflow, but you want GIS to bring it into a systems-based report structure. Alteryx provides the blueprint, but GIS has to now take and translate each step into code.
Rather than have a developer spending valuable time interpreting and recoding the work you have already completed, what if Alteryx had a tool or ready-made output feature that translates your entire workflow into your code of choice (e.g. SQL, Python, VBA, other) that you could just send to GIS and they implement? Kind of like the Macro recording feature in Excel that translates steps into VBA. This would provide a near immediate solution, reducing the days, weeks or even months of additional development work and capacity for an already under pressure GIS.
Ah, but you say there's a catch to this idea. Let's say you need an enhancement to the workflow that has been hardcoded in system. You would need to now submit a ticket to GIS for them to develop and update the code, right?
No, just adjust and iterate in workflow, rerun and submit the updated code to GIS.
Search Box for Tools like Formula Tool where a drop down list of all columns is present to choose from the list. It might take quite a while to search for a specific column in a Formula tool when there is hundreds of columns in a data stream. This is quite an important case when we work with raw columns directly from an SAP extractor.
The constant [Engine.GuiInteraction] can be used to determine whether a workflow was run in the Designer or Gallery. Currently, there's no method to also find out whether a workflow was initiated by a schedule or run manually in the Gallery. The information is available in the Gallery but not forwarded to inside the workflow.
Please introduce a new variable [Engine.ScheduledRun] (or similar) which determines whether the workflow was initiated by a schedule (value "true" if boolean or "schedule" if string type) or manually (value "false" or "manual").
When building join operations in Alteryx, it can be time-consuming to manually scroll through long lists of fields to find the right one to join on, especially when working with large datasets or unfamiliar schemas.
It would be great to have a search-as-you-type filter in the Join tool’s field selection interface. Similar to the existing field selector search, this feature would allow users to start typing a field name and instantly see a filtered list of partial matches. This would significantly speed up the process of identifying and selecting the correct join fields and reduce the risk of selecting incorrect fields due to visual clutter.
In complex Alteryx workflows, it can be hard to navigate between different tool containers - especially when there are dozens spread across in a large canvas.
I would love a feature where users could create a 'table of contents' using clickable text or bookmarks at the top of the workflow. For example, Clicking on a text label named 'Output Calculation' would automatically scroll to view to the Tool Container named 'Output Calculation'.
Suggested Implementation ideas :
This would massively improve usability and workflow navigation, especially for large teams or workflows that are shared across departments.
Inspiration :
Tools like POWER BI and TABLEAU allow similar dashboard or bookmark style navigation . Implementing this in Alteryx designer would be a game changer.
Currently the simulation sampling tool doesn't accept model objects from time series tools as a model input. It would be beneficial if it could so one could run simulations from Time series output (or a new tool is built to offer this functionality)
I would like a function to be added that pulls the weekending date of an entered date.
For example, the week ending date for today, 2025-06-10 would be 2025-06-14.
It could be called DateTimeWeekEnd and look like DateTimeWeekEnd("2025-06-10","Saturday")
The value entered first would be a date or field with an optional parameter to choose Saturday or Sunday for the week ending date. I would think Saturday would be the default week ending date but I am not sure.
I've seen a few older threads on this but wanted to bring it up again.
I have numerous workflows in which I have built in "fail safes" to prevent passing bad data out to downstream databases/reports. I have Message tools that provide a specific message on whether the fail safe was triggered or the new/refreshed data was passed through. The problem with the Message tool is that it is very easy for the message to get lost in the myriad log results so you don't automatically see it. The same is true for using the Browse tool to view a dynamic and more easy-to-read message/result, you still have to make the overt decision to click the Browse tool to review the result/message.
Admittingly, on their own, these "issues" seem minor. However, when running multiple workflows as part of a group or on a regular basis, some of which can be very large and complex, its easy for these "minor issues" to become major inconveniences to utilize as they are intended or they just get lost in the static of everything that happens when a workflow runs.
Having something similar to a Report Text tool that can render an image and formula-driven text/conditions (font and background color controls) directly and conspicuously on the canvas would be AWESOME and go a long way to providing immediate/easy-to-see information regarding the results of the workflow.
I ask/encourage the Alteryx team to explore providing this capability.
I was setting up a rather large set of repetitive filters and formulas and when I got done, I wanted to select the output of each tool all at once to drag them in to a Union tool. I think it would be great if you could hold the control key to select multiple outputs to drag to the next tool at a given time.
Hello,
What about a new tool to deal with file actions, such as deleting, renaming, moving, etc ? Today, we do that with cmd, not the easiest way to do. I have developed a tool on Amphi that gives a good idea of what we could have on Alteryx
Here the result :
That can help with temporary, useless files and probably other use cases.
Best regards,
Simon
It would be nice to track changes. The function would need to have an on and off switch. Some workflows are large and you want to go back to the changes you've made. My team has 2 identical workflows one for production and one for validation. Tracked changes would help manage changes between both workflows. The tracked changes could be something like highlighting the tools red once changed, and after the function is turned on. I have attached a sample image for your reference. Thank you.
Hi,
I would like to see an option within the 'Find Nearest Tool' (and maybe other Tools like it) to exclude from results when a particular Target field equals a particular Universe field. This could be added right under the 'Ignore 0 Distance Matches' in config window. You could have drop-downs (like a filter tool) to pick the fields etc. Example of what I'm doing: One Address may have multiple accounts and it's in Target and Universe. Ignoring 0 Distance would drop all the other Accounts at the same address. I only want it to ignore the Universe Address if it has the same Account Number and the Target Account Number. That is a little deeper drill than just ignore 0 Distance but not too hard to add.
As it stands, I don't ignore 0 Distance. I have a formula after the 'Find Nearest' to drop Target Acct Nbr = Universe Acct Nbr. Then a 'Multi-Row Formula' tool to fix the find nearest order. This works, but I thought it might be nice to have it in the tool.
1. Image Processing Tool functionality should be available in Reporting tools.
2. Image Output Location should allow for a temp file location
3. Image Processing should allow lock of aspect ratio when Cropping (like Scale)
4. Image Processing should allow for fieldname selection for Crop, Scale ...etc to allow for custom calculations. Being able to generate custom values for width and height based upon the values generated in from image profile would be useful
I want to have the ability to share workflows with non-Alteryx users so they can see what steps were followed within my workflows in order to create the output(s). Without a read-only viewer Alteryx users are forced to screenshot and write out the steps they followed in the workflows to document what they did which can be extremely laborious and time consuming when workflows get into the 50+ tool range. A read-only viewer would save Alteryx users time and give non-Alteryx users a sneak peak into how Alteryx works as well. It could peak the interest of non-Alteryx users to learn more about Alteryx and possibly convince them to download a trial and eventually purchase a license, so it could improve documentation methods as well as be an asset for marketing to non-Alteryx users. For reference, Tableau offers a similar solution called Reader.
My request is to allow navigation to specific System settings without having to click through the entire process to get to the specific section of the settings you want to change.
It would be great to be able to use keyboard shortcuts to be able to switch between the different tools in the canvas, or use the keyboard shortcut to select different tools from the Tool Pallette (similar to Excel).
The Join Tool tells you which records did not match (Left and Right) but it does not tell you what fields it did not match on. This could quickly help the analyst determine which fields they need to look into to determine why there are unmatched records. When joining on 5+ fields it becomes difficult to determine why some records did not match without manually inspecting each record which is time consuming. The column title could be: Unmatched Field(s) and the values should be concatenated separated by commas.
When the name of a field is changed early in a workflow, all corresponding tools that use the renamed field should have the option to auto update the field name. This way I don't have to manully update the name of each effected field.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
6 | |
5 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |