Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
I hope that there will be a radio button or a check box where Auto Save on Run can be disabled. Auto Save on Run is a bad idea. I often go into workflows and only need one report - so I break a bunch of connections to other reports, maybe I make some other small adhoc or one-off type changes and then Run the workflow. I get my one, maybe modified, report and close without saving. So the next time I open the workflow it's as it should be.
With Auto Save on Run - I'd have to undo everything I changed. What if it's not my workflow to be changing? If there is no option to turn it off: I'd have to make a copy of the workflow, open and make changes, then run, then close, then delete the workflow.
In general, you should never be saving unless it is a deliberate act performed by the user.
When opening an App in Designer - you are generally opening it to work on. It should not open as an App but rather it should open as a Workflow. Maybe make it so if you hold down the Ctrl or Shift key and opens the App - it opens as an App and you can test it out.
When reading in multiple files/tabs with different field schema, there will be an error. It can be done by using macro. It would be great if there is a tool to read in all.
Please offload map rendering, in Browse Tool, to the video card using DirectX or OpenGL, the software rendering currently used is embarrassingly slow and disruptive.
Posting on behalf of Door To Door Organics:
Canvases can get pretty huge and it's an unintuitive pain to have to scroll and shift+scroll across a large canvas, and an even bigger pain to rely on the sliders at the edges of the canvas. It would be REALLY nice if we could navigate the canvas by dragging the canvas around, much like a touch interface, in the same way that Photoshop's "Hand Tool" works.
As an added plus, the same hotkey that Photoshop uses (the spacebar) should also be usable in Designer, since, I'm pretty sure it's not used for anything else at the moment, as a hotkey. The functionality would look like this: hold down the spacebar (which changes the mouse cursor to a hand tool) and then, while the space bar is still held down, you'd be able to "grab" the canvas and drag it around in your view port in order to traverse it in a much more intuitive way. Bonus points if you could manage to implement some inertial scrolling with this as well. 😃
Some of us work in teams to build complex workflows, resulting in various versions that have to be stitched together. It would be amazing to have the workflow on a shared drive and have a mode where multiple users can build, review, and modify simultaneously. (This was one of the biggest sells for our company migration from Microsoft Office to Google suite).
This would promote collaboration, learning, and more efficient and quality driven workflows.
Wouldn't it be nice to have more training examples available on YouTube?
When you perform an "insert after", you have to navigate directly to the tool. Not the end of the world, but if I could search through this list, it would be much quicker to do this function.
Another way of achieving this is when you add a new tool to a canvas - if you drag it on top of an existing tool the designer could ask "do you want to add this after (taking over all connections) or before; or connect the regular old way.... That way, the existing search woudl work.
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to CTRL+Scroll-Up and have the font size of the browse contents EXPAND?
Sometimes I just want to see the tool names without the annotations. Currently the options are Hide, Show, Show with Tool Names, but there doesn't seem to be a way to just see Tool Names without annotations.
The Python tool has been a tremendous boon in being able to add capability that is not yet available in the Alteryx platform.
It would make the Python Tool much more usable and useful if you can define the inputs explicitly rather than just relying on the good behaviour of both the user; and also the python code that reads the inbound data (Alteryx.Read('#1'))
This is not something that the Jupyter notebook code-interface may handle directly (because the Jupyter notebook has no priveledged knowledge of the workflow outside it); so this may be best handled by the container itself.
The key here is that if my python app requires 2 inputs - it should be possible to define these explicitly so that we can test; and also so that we can prevent errors and make this more bullet-proof.
The same would apply on the outbound nodes for the Python tool.
Presto is a in-memory SQL query engine on hadoop and having Alteryx connecting to Presto will vastly improve performance. Appreciate if you could introduce a Presto connector.
It would be nice if we could use our gallery with a mobile app. We like to run demographics on site and have to pull up on the ipad.
Also, if instead of typing in an address, we could use the iphones "current location" option.
Make it easier to use Delete and connect around
ex: Shift + Delete
Hi Team,
If you can please work on the idea of auto arranging the tools on Alteryx Designer. This would save a lot of tedious efforts, when we create a very big flow then it becomes very tough for us to arrange the tools properly and it becomes confusing sometimes.
Thanks
Scenario: 6 input tools, and want to add, say, a select tool after each one.
Would be nice to select all 6, and add the tool after all of them at once.
Many times we create and work on multiple workflows that are similar or are tied to the same project, but when it comes time to save them we must save each workflow as an individual file.I think it would be great if we can mimic what MS Office/Tableau have done; allow user to save multiple tabs or reports/dashboards under the same file. It would be great if Alteryx will allow us to create multiple workflows under the same workbook which can be renamed, be tied to their own workflow schedules without having to be saved separately and can be tied under the same 'project' or 'workbook'.
The one single feature I miss the most in Alteryx, is the possibility to restart the workflow from wherever I want by using a built-in cache functionality. I have used the 'Cache Dataset V2' macro, but it really is to inflexible and really doesn't make me a happy Alteryx user. I would like to se a more flexible, quicker way of working with cached data.
On a single tool in the workflow I want to be able to set the option to:
There should be lots of workflow options regarding the creation/deletion of cached data. Examples:
...and so on. These are just a few examples, but there should be lots of options and shortcut keys revolving the cached data functionality in the workflow.
Sometimes I want to copy just the Name and Type fields from the metadata in the Results window. Even when selecting this option, however, all 5 available fields still get copied and pasted. I would like to see this change to work as expected and only copy those cells selected.
Copy only the first two columns
All of them get pasted
Cc @DultonM
the SQL Editing screen has recently been changed (thank you @JPoz and team!) - and now has syntax indenting and keyword coloring.
Could I ask that you make a minor change in the indenting, where the on part is indented underneath the Join?
Select
Field1,
Field2,
field3
from
Table1
inner join table2
On Table1.key = table2.key
and table1.keyb = table2.keyb
inner join table3
on table3.key = table1.key
and table3.date = table1.date
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
6 | |
5 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 |