Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
I've run into an issue where I'm using an Input (or dynamic input) tool inside a macro (attached) which is being updated via a File Browse tool. Being that I work at a large company with several data sources; so we use a lot of Shared (Gallery) Connections. The issue is that whenever I try to enter any sort of aliased connection (Gallery or otherwise), it reverts to the default connection I have in the Input or Dynamic Input tool. It does not act this way if I use a manually typed connection string.
Initially, I thought this was a bug; so I brought it to Support's attention. They told me that this was the default action of the tool. So I'm suggesting that the default action of Input and Dynamic Input tools be changed to allow being overridden by Aliased connections with File Browse and Action tools. The simplest way to implement this would probably be to translate the alias before pushing it to the macro.
The current SharePoint connector works fine until you encounter SharePoint lists hosted in MS Groups which appears to use Azure Active directory much different from how the original SharePoint domain works. An easy way to determine this is if your SharePoint lists have a domain with https://groups.companyname.com instead of https://companyname.sharepoint.com.
Currently the work around is having go through the MS Groups API which is complicated and requires extra IT support for access and other credentials.
Cisco, which has been building enterprise networks, and is literally close to the Internet of Things, is creating some data products, perhaps a platform, perhaps a suite, to handle big data. Part of their offering is DNA Data Virtualization (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/enterprise-networks/dna-virtualization/index.html). Compare Cisco at 75,000 employees to SAS at 15,000.
Have been using Alteryx GA component and found some issues, apart from the setup teething problems I was having.
So thought I’d let you know , in case it’s just not me who is suffering…
We do a fair amount of marketing for our Private business and like to measure conversion of the pipeline.
I’ve been looking at Lead -> Account -> Trade
Have been drilling into lead data with little source identifiers which are appearing in a NULL bucket..
When using Alteryx
I noticed that the Profiles for my id do not appear fully in Alteryx via the drop down..
It picks up QA profile data instead of the live profiles and does not show the whole set ?
Tableau works correctly showing the complete set of GA profiles
I don’t have the full set of profiles…
Maybe config related but why bring in some profiles and not others when I can access fine from GA directly and via Tableau ?
Trying to set these profiles and config files seemed problematic – reset to default removes the 4 config files, when you run again it doesn’t create them.
Had to keep a copy of these and put them back in manually or cpy an old widget and run a new one up from that …
Resetting the profile and saving caused other errors to appear related to the Tokens…
Found that annoying and a waste of time… immature (arghh) !
I think the Alteryx implementation is immature and not as good as Tableau and you have more work to do…! But may just be me !
Can you help improve it as I’d like to pull and blend reliably via Alteryx and do this for a range of dates to avoid sampling data
I do love the product but love this a little less than anything else …
I’d also love to be able to pull from Tableau data sources into Alteryx as we have all of our history in Tableau server
Has anyone else wanted the same ?
Obviously you can store to TDE but want the reverse… to pull from Tableau server
Below is a list of DBMS rankings as of August 2016
(for an updated and longer list see: http://db-engines.com/en/ranking)
I personally look for; HBase, Splunk, MariaDB, Couchbase, Amazon Dynamo, CouchDB connections...
Rank | DBMS | Database Model | Alteryx | ||
Aug | Jul | Aug | |||
2016 | 2016 | 2015 | |||
1. | 1 | 1 | Oracle | Relational DBMS | Yes |
2. | 2 | 2 | MySQL | Relational DBMS | Yes |
3. | 3 | 3 | Microsoft SQL Server | Relational DBMS | Yes |
4. | 4 | 4 | MongoDB | Document store | Yes |
5. | 5 | 5 | PostgreSQL | Relational DBMS | Yes |
6. | 6 | 6 | DB2 | Relational DBMS | Yes |
7. | 7 | 8 | Cassandra | Wide column store | Yes |
8. | 8 | 7 | Microsoft Access | Relational DBMS | Yes |
9. | 9 | 9 | SQLite | Relational DBMS | Yes |
10. | 10 | 10 | Redis | Key-value store | No |
11. | 11 | 14 | Elasticsearch | Search engine | No |
12. | 12 | 13 | Teradata | Relational DBMS | Yes |
13. | 13 | 11 | SAP Adaptive Server | Relational DBMS | Yes |
14. | 14 | 12 | Solr | Search engine | No |
15. | 15 | 15 | HBase | Wide column store | No |
16. | 16 | 17 | FileMaker | Relational DBMS | No |
17. | 18 | 18 | Splunk | Search engine | No |
18. | 17 | 16 | Hive | Relational DBMS | Yes |
19. | 19 | 19 | SAP HANA | Relational DBMS | Yes |
20. | 20 | 25 | MariaDB | Relational DBMS | No |
21. | 21 | 22 | Neo4j | Graph DBMS | No |
22. | 22 | 20 | Informix | Relational DBMS | No |
23. | 23 | 21 | Memcached | Key-value store | No |
24. | 24 | 24 | Couchbase | Document store | No |
25. | 25 | 28 | Amazon DynamoDB | Document store | No |
26. | 26 | 23 | CouchDB | Document store | No |
27. | 27 | 30 | Vertica | Relational DBMS | Yes |
28. | 28 | 29 | Microsoft Azure SQL Database | Relational DBMS | Yes |
29. | 29 | 27 | Netezza | Relational DBMS | Yes |
30. | 30 | 26 | Firebird | Relational DBMS | No |
31. | 31 | 31 | Riak KV | Key-value store | No |
32. | 33 | 40 | Amazon Redshift | Relational DBMS | Yes |
33. | 32 | 32 | MarkLogic | Multi-model | No |
34. | 34 | 34 | dBASE | Relational DBMS | Yes |
35. | 35 | 35 | Greenplum | Relational DBMS | Yes |
36. | 36 | 33 | Ingres | Relational DBMS | No |
37. | 37 | 39 | Impala | Relational DBMS | Yes |
38. | 38 | 36 | Sphinx | Search engine | No |
39. | 39 | 43 | Hazelcast | Key-value store | No |
40. | 40 | 38 | Ehcache | Key-value store | No |
41. | 41 | 51 | Google BigQuery | Relational DBMS | Yes |
42. | 43 | 50 | OrientDB | Multi-model | No |
43. | 42 | 41 | Interbase | Relational DBMS | No |
44. | 45 | 45 | Spark SQL | Relational DBMS | No |
45. | 44 | 55 | Titan | Graph DBMS | No |
46. | 46 | 68 | RethinkDB | Document store | No |
47. | 50 | 81 | InfluxDB | Time Series DBMS | No |
48. | 47 | 69 | Aerospike | Key-value store | No |
49. | 49 | 47 | Cloudant | Document store | No |
I want to connect to Salesforce without Security Token.
Salesforce doesn't need Security Token when we set Login IP Ranges.
Actual Condition:
Thank you for considering our request.
I would love the to get back the ability to use WHERE clauses in the custom SQL to manage the data that gets imported from xlsx files. I can currently use the legacy driver but would like to have that added in for the current driver.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
11 | |
8 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 |