you know - I have been chewing through this myself Mark! While I do definately agree with you that 3-dimensional geometry would be useful, one of the things that I've been trying to work through in my head is how to deal with the fact that the spatial tools in Alteryx are not actually regular cartesian space, they're based on the geometry of a spherical surface - so we'd have to make it clear and obvious to people when they are using spherical geometry vs. cartesian geometry.
But genuinely - I have been pondering this one for a while - especially for tasks like network coverage for towers etc.
The status of this idea has been changed to 'Inactive'. This status indicates that:
1. The idea has not had activity in the form of likes or comments in over a year.
2. The idea has not reached ten likes.
3. The idea is still in the 'New Idea' status.
However, this doesn't mean your idea won't be implemented! The Community can still like and comment on this idea. With enough renewed interest, this idea can be brought back into the 'New Idea' status.
Thank you for contributing to the Alteryx Community and the Alteryx Product Idea Boards!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.