Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
A user may need to perform regression test on their workflows when there is a version upgrade of Alteryx. To save users time and effort, users can be encouraged to submit a few workflows in a secure area of the Alteryx Gallery. Prior to a version release, the Alteryx product testing team can perform a regression test of these workflows using automation. Thus when users receive an upgraded version of Aleryx it is more robust and with the added assurance that the workflows they had submitted will continue to work without errors.
Hello,
When i build my workflows i often times have to save, close, and reopen just to see data flow through tools and check for errors.
It would be awesome if there was a validate button next to the run button so we dont have to go through all of this just to check for errors...
It would also be nice if we didnt need a button but the data automatically flowed through the tools to see compatibility automatically.
Nick
Hello all,
It would be awesome to see an obvious change to the Input Tool when you change the setting from Cached to Not Cached. Something simple so that as the process is running i can clearly see what that setting is opposed to having to stop the process and restart it.
Thoughts?
Nick
Hello Team,
I have been using Alteryx for sometime now. The final output of any kind be it analytics or simple Excel outputs is expected to have some basic formatting.
A minimum of 3 Tools and humongous effort is need to format even basic headers and Cells with a border and color.
Using Table followed by Render and then column level setting for having borders for the set of data is little time consuming considering it has 0 impact on the actual data output.
Additionally Render tool to Excel will be in number format regardless of the data type. Same is the case for date fields.
Also the Render tool Layout changes impact the data as well as the column lengths adversely.
Can we have some simple option of overwriting a file where the formatted excel is merely overwritten with data without changing the datatype or format out the excel sheet.
It would be huge win if this is easily do-able wither via a new tool or as an option in the output tool.
Hello All,
During my trial of assisted modelling, I've enjoyed how well guided the process is, however, I've come across one area for improvement that would help those (including myself) overcome any hurdles when getting started.
When I ran my first model, I was presented with an error stating that certain fields had classes in the validation dataset that were not present in the Training dataset.
Upon investigation (and the Alteryx Community!) I discovered that this was due to a step in the One Hot Encoding tool.
Basically, the Default setting is for all fields to be set to error under the step for dealing with values not present in the training dataset, but there is an option to ignore these scenarios.
My suggestion:
Add an additional step to Assisted Modelling that gives the user the option to Ignore / Error as they see fit.
If this were to be implemented then it would remove the only barrier I could find in Assisted Modelling.
Hope this is useful and happy to provide further context / details if needed.
I find myself constantly in a situation where I am building a workflow and need to add a browse tool or branch out from the main path to test some ideas or check something and it is very annoying having to run the whole process again, I know that there is the option to cache but it the criteria is very impractical because you can't cache at different points in the workflow easily.
It should be possible to add some tools like browse or output to a file without having to re-run the whole workflow again.
Similar to "Start here" dataflow, it would be useful to specify a path within the User settings to open a dataflow "template" file when the users do not have permission to add or replace "start here" dataflow.
Within our organisation, we are required to have the dataflow summary. We have prepared a dataflow to meet these requirements but currently unable to share it like "start here" template so that every Alteryx session opens the agreed datalow "template" file.
It would be helpful to have one of the following methods to disable output modules to prevent overwriting output files each time a workflow is run:
- A global 'Disable All Output Modules' option, which would effectively mute the workflow without removing any connections
- A module-specific 'disable/enable this module' option, to the same end
One idea that could help a lot of users while preparing dashboard solutions where we might need to attach artifacts for proof or references that might have helped us in developing the dashboards.
I'd love to see a Haskell Tool similar to the already existing Python and R-Tool.
Haskell is a great way to handle data without side-effects. I know I am probably pretty much alone with this suggestion, but I wanted to share it anyway.
I also know Python can do basically everything Haskell can do, but it isn't as beautiful and effective as it is in Haskell. Haskell brings many logic operators and great syntactic "sugar" out of the box. Things like pattern matching with input parameters is just amazing in Haskell and would require way more code in Python.
Dear Alteryx Gods,
Please hear my plea and add these beloved excel functions into the formula tool, using 3 Alteryx tools to do this simple task is ridiculous.
Thanks!
Every time I open a new workflow I start with a heading and subheading.
The aim is to ensure I know what this workflow is for, the date, who it is for and what was happening around me at the time I created the workflow. This helps bring me back to the premise that kicked this whole thing off and puts me in the frame of mind to understand what was happening at the time I created this workflow.
Occasionally in my workflow I'll have some comments, snippets of code and especially warnings for things to pay attention to when I open or before I run a workflow.
It would be fantastic if the documentation palette can be expanded to more than just three tools to include some of these comment tools, or a customizable set of tools/macros that will allow me to just set it once and reuse them as needed to keep style and formatting consistent so that I can focus on the workflow while keeping everything documented and tidy. Bonus points for including one that allows me to put my logo/signature on the canvas too.
My current workaround to this is putting all my styles in a workflow and having that open to copy and paste the comment and update the content.
In the Results - Workflow - Messages and Message Tool would like to add a new message type called Passed.
Changes:
1. In Results - Workflow Messages add new section between Warnings and Messages of Passed with Green Circle Icon
2. In Message Tool, add Message Type of Passed
Rationale:
This would be used for verifying data and indicating that tests have passed. I think one of the great advantages of Alteryx is all of the data verification you can do. For example I can download a report of the totals of all transactions for the year and compare to my daily transactions making sure they sum to the same number. Automated testing!!! The issue is I have to report when the test pass as a warning and I would rather have some green success messages of Passed! I like the visual indicator of success rather than just reporting the negative warnings & errors.
Thanks for considering.
I want to create Descriptions for my fields in addition to those Alteryx auto creates, Text to Columns tool for example. I want to load these descriptions automatically into Tableau Hyper files so when I use the Tableau describe field feature, I will see them there. It also sets up the potential to create a data dictionary in the Tableau workbook based on these descriptions. Please give the option to load field descriptions into Tableau hyper files. Thank you.
Can we have an Alteryx environment that is like a free sandbox similar in nature to Tableau's Tableau Public? It will really help people wanting to get Alteryx certified prepare for certifications without paying the expensive AUD7,795. Please help the jobseekers who would like to pick up Alteryx but cannot afford your hefty price tag just yet.
Hello Alteryx Dev Gurus -
I made an event to email me when there was an error at run time. But I did not populate the 'To' field. (I know!) The process borked soft and shows as an error in the results queue when a customer noticed there was no data. This is one of the simple ones.
Thanks!
I am using 2 or 3 displays set up to be more productive with most of my work. If only we can have snap-on features in Alteryx that support for the windows to be able to snap on multiple displays, not just floating.
The problem with floating windows is they are not correctly aligned for the full-frame and some require custom resizing. to make it worse, some floating windows interchange in their resolution due to multiple resolutions of the display and the non-snap floating windows (configuration, results etc.)
Apologies if this is a bit edge case and only something that I struggle with but I'd really like the option to add workflow Meta Info when saving a workflow to the Gallery. We have a strict rule that all workflows must have a Meta Info description when we save to Gallery, but I often forget so end up saving once, then I add Meta Info, then have to save again. I would like a little box under the details box, on the Save As, dialogue box to add this Meta Info, (see screen shot below). This data would then also appear in the Meta Info tab in the Workflow - Configuration properties.
R has a very large number of useful packages and examples. Often, we only need a few lines of R code. However, integrating that with the data flow in Alteryx can be complex. It would be ideal if there was a tool where you could drop in R code, and have the tool create named inputs and outputs for each variable in the R code, and create blank text documents or YXDBs with the correct column names and variable types. This seems like it could be automated, and would eliminate a lot of trial and error in using small pieces of R code for specialty tasks.
User | Likes Count |
---|---|
32 | |
5 | |
5 | |
3 | |
3 |