Be sure to review our Idea Submission Guidelines for more information!
Submission GuidelinesHello,
After used the new "Image Recognition Tool" a few days, I think you could improve it :
> by adding the dimensional constraints in front of each of the pre-trained models,
> by adding a true tool to divide the training data correctly (in order to have an equivalent number of images for each of the labels)
> at least, allow the tool to use black & white images (I wanted to test it on the MNIST, but the tool tells me that it necessarily needs RGB images) ?
Question : do you in the future allow the user to choose between CPU or GPU usage ?
In any case, thank you again for this new tool, it is certainly perfectible, but very simple to use, and I sincerely think that it will allow a greater number of people to understand the many use cases made possible thanks to image recognition.
Thank you again
Kévin VANCAPPEL (France ;-))
Thank you again.
Kévin VANCAPPEL
Alteryx could have a way to, in select tool, choose the type of string field as numeric changing between comma or dot the separators without the needing of formula tool for that.
Currently if I read multiple files through Directory Tool +Dynamic Input, I will not know which final records is from which file, which can be extreme useful.
I also know, the files need to be the same schema (a second limitation), but the filename itself will be handy
When building an analytic app which uses a Map Input, please enable Interface tool functionality which would allow the app user to change the base map (roads, imagery, etc.) within the app map interface. Currently I believe the only way to accommodate different base maps in an app is to configure multiple Map Inputs – one for each base map. The resulting map interface duplication clutters up the app and opens the door for configuration errors.
Enable app user control of base map
As we all know, we can filter only based on 1 condition on 1 column within our data-set using FILTER tool till date.
Idea is if people can add multiple conditions on same or different columns within same tool. e.g.
Thanks!
One feature in the input tool that would be great to have added to the already existing "Output file name as field" option would be to set the field at the beginning of the data set or end (i.e. you could set your default, click a check box or select from two options). Because with large data sets sometimes you need to do data manipulation on that field and it can be easier to work with right away if at the beginning of data set. Right now you have to drag in a select tool to fix it.
Many Times We have to do same transformation or Rules on Certain fields multiple times. and In even in my team multiple developers are also doing the same thing. If we have Tools re-usability functionality like. Build at one place and every one can pull that to each of their workflows and use it multiple times. This will be really helpful and save lot of time on duplicate works
It will be very help full, if we have an option to ignore selected punctuation in Data Cleansing Tool under remove unwanted characters.
For example i wanted to ignore "&" and "-" while replacing punctuation, currently there is no option to ignore characters.
Please check the possibility of Adding the feature
I have a workflow that accepts 4 different sets of inputs.
It also has four different outputs. However, I can easily output to separate files in four containers and just close the containers that don't pertain to the input.
On the input side, I keep having to delete the connections and connect the desired input.
I would like to connect multiple files to one tool and have the tool only work if only one of the inputs it's live. Through the use of containers you would then choose which input was live.
Hi Team,
The data set has 2 columns with missing data,
Amount
Age
If the user wants to impute the
missing values in Amount column with '$0" and
missing values in Age column with "mode",
it would be nice to have a single imputation tool to perform this.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks
I think it would be really useful to add bearing in degrees to the Find Nearest Tool. While the cardinal direction is helpful for context, it would be great to have finer detail than just the 8 options.
Why don't Alteryx build an "Designer extended edition"?
An Alteryx designer download that contains every available
I notice that at least my Output files are tied up "being used by another program" after the workflow is closed. I have to actually close out of Alteryx to release the file. The file s/b released as soon as the workflow using it is done running. Failing that, as soon as the workflow is closed vs having to close Alteryx completely.
...or is this just my issue?
in a scenario where i pass multiple files to the download tool (to upload to an FTP server), the data in the workflow gets cut off with the message "ended by a downstream tool". This leads to me only uploading one file (out of the two I am trying to upload).
based on community posts, this seems to be because i am not outputting anything in the workflow or do not have any browses (browses are automatically turned off because I am using Crew Macro's List Runner)
BUG: the download tool should count as an output tool because it is indeed outputting.
BUG 2: if browses are disabled but they exist in the workflow, it should still create all the records.
Hello,
I think replacement in Formula tool should work a little different. Now the tool recognize Column variable because it is in square brackets. When you:
1, select not whole text with brackets
2. click on the Columns and Constants and select one
you get an error like in the attached files.
In my opinion, however you click on a variable in editor (regardless of what you've selected), when you select a column or a constant, it should be fully replaced without parsing error.
Best,
Piotr
In the Visual Layout Tool, is it possible to improve the naming capabilities?
Upstream in the workflow I named tables.
However, in the Visual Layout Tool, Tables are listed as 1,2,3 despite the names assigned earlier.
With several tables, it is difficult to keep track.
I have been working in some large files where I end up wanting to highlight several tools that are connected together, copy them, paste them and what to insert all at the same time in the same order into another section of my workflow and still have the tools around it connect the way things work when you are dragging in one tool at a time. This would save a lot of time of having to delete connections, drag tools out to make room for the ones I want to add and then reconnect everything back together again. I perform this sort of thing on a regular basis and it adds time when I am trying to save time by connecting the same series of tools I was just using.
It would be great if the Drivetime could be increased to an hour - or even more.
In this blog post http://www.chaosreignswithin.com/2019/06/alteryx19-nashville-we-turned-it-up-to.html, Mark mentioned there is report of Runner macros not working correctly on Windows 10 Enterprise. So I decided to create test workflows to reproduce this error. I've attached 4 files, which you'll need to download and place in a folder to reproduce this error.
Here is the error I produced. The ListRunnerDriver.yxmd goes into an infinite loop.
Here is the state of the folder is when I aborted the ListRunnerDriver.yxmd.
I wasn’t able to reproduce this error with 1 child workflow, which isn’t how we use List Runner macro. So if you did your testing with 1 child workflow, you would not have seen an error.
After I added a 2nd child workflow is when the error occurred, which is how we typically use List Runner macro, more than 1 child workflows.
NB: I used only List Runner and Log Parser macros from the Crew Macros Pack.
Steps to reproduce the errors:
1. Create a folder
2. Copy all attached files in say folder.
3. Open ListRunnerDriver.yxmd
4. Run ListRunnerDriver.yxmd.
5. Look for errors.
ListRunnerChild.yxmd and ListRunnerChild2.yxmd each are a simple workflow with 2 tools: Text Input and Output tools. They write to 2 different Excel workbooks. In this case, only the ListRunnerChild.yxmd produced an output.
When List Runner macro tried to run ListRunnerChild2.yxmd is when the infinite loop started.
The ListRunnerDriver.Log.xlsx has the messages, but in this case, with the infinite loop and errors, this output is never written.
Right now as far as I know you need to add each DB connection manually. This works... but is quite time consuming when trying to run tasks against a cluster of prod databases. It would be awesome to pass a JSON config file,example below, to the Alteryx Engine and have Alteryx create those connections upon parsing the file. This would save tons of time, and allow teams to share a central config file with consistent aliases across their clusters to ensure their app connections point to the same DBs across workflows. It would also make on boarding a breeze for new developers on team.
Usuario | Cantidad |
---|---|
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 |