This site uses different types of cookies, including analytics and functional cookies (its own and from other sites). To change your cookie settings or find out more, click here. If you continue browsing our website, you accept these cookies.
General Discussions has some can't miss conversations going on right now! From conversations about automation to sharing your favorite Alteryx memes, there's something for everyone. Make it part of your community routine!
Discussion thread for day 8 of the Advent of Code : https://adventofcode.com/2020/day/8
Day 8!
Part 1 is simple, but Part 2 is too slow to search the result.
Part 1 is an Iterative macro and Part 2 is a Batch macro.
Iterative Macro:
Batch Macro:
As anonymous user #1105310
I was very happy that I managed to solve it without any macros! They are such a pain to debug, if you can avoid them its always good.
https://github.com/NedHarding/Advent2020/blob/main/Day8.yxmd
@NedHarding you're a madman but those multi row formulas are excellent.
Part 2 was tough for me. I ended up rebuilding and simplifying my initial iterative macro in order to solve part 2.
iterative
Batch
Solved part 2 without needing to do it with a batch macro by generating the rows for each of the 300 versions of the model input that are needed.
Same concept for the iterative macro for both parts, just a small tweak on part B so it exits when a solution is found.
Macro for Part B with the break when total records < records in previous step i.e. a solution has been found.
Sorry, no head for part 2 today.
Just for fun, I can generate rows and then do most all of the work in 1 formula tool using the Alteryx Abacus (non-BaseA). It's pretty fast.
I DID IT!! I figured out how to do this one without macros!!!!! Now to be fair, I solved it the hard & painful iterative-macro-within-an-iterative-macro way last night when I was trying to get stars... but then I spent all night not sleeping thinking there had to be a better way, and lo and behold, IT WORKED.
First solution (runs both parts in 30+ minutes, + Iterative Macro Inception):
   
 
Second solution (Runs both parts in ~26 seconds + NO MACROS):
Is BootCode the new Intcode? BRING IT ON.
Cheers!!
NJ
Definitely not winning tool golf here. And I love @NicoleJohnson 's method of putting the row skipping and accumulator into one tool. For my brain, worked better in 2 multirows. Plus I added another multirow tool to see if codes repeated because I hated that the unique tool sorted the data and then I had to sort again to get back into order.
23.1 seconds. No macros. Take that, Intcode nightmares!!! Part 1 only took .7 seconds, which amazed me.
Credit goes to @patrick_digan 's method of concatenating and replacing pieces of code from last year. Worked like a charm.