Alteryx Designer Desktop Discussions

Find answers, ask questions, and share expertise about Alteryx Designer Desktop and Intelligence Suite.
SOLVED

Multi Row Formula Tool - Help

Mike_at_CG
8 - Asteroid

Hi Alteryx Community

 

Wondering if someone can help me translate the below into the multi row formula tool?

 

Scenario:

Meeting morning funding requirements in accounts that have multiple people owning assets.

 

Formula in pseudo code:

If the cusip value meets the amount needed then use up all of that cusip and then move onto the next fund.

If the cusip value does not meet the amount needed then use up as much of that cusip as possible and then move onto another person that might have enough to cover.

 

Below is an example of the data.  Columns 1-4 are already available and formatted using my current workflow.  Columns 5-8 are pre formatted based on what I want the outcome to be.

 

SleeveFundCusipCusip ValueAmount NeededResultLeft Over
Person AFund 1Cusip 1  100,000.00             50,000.00    50,000.00                  -  
Person BFund 1Cusip 2    95,000.00   
Person CFund 1Cusip 3    85,000.00   
Person DFund 1Cusip 4    75,000.00   
Person AFund 2Cusip 1  100,000.00           300,000.00  100,000.00  200,000.00
Person BFund 2Cusip 2  100,000.00           200,000.00  100,000.00  100,000.00
Person CFund 2Cusip 3  100,000.00           100,000.00  100,000.00                  -  
Person DFund 2Cusip 4  100,000.00   

 

Thank you for your time

5 REPLIES 5
Pilsner
11 - Bolide

Hello @Mike_at_CG 

I have had a look at your problem and attempted to provide a solution. Reading your post there are a couple of points I'm not quite certain on. Firstly, I don't understand the importance of the Sleeve column as the Cusip column seems to correspond directly to the sleeve column. Secondly, I made the assumption that the calculations should be grouped per Fund. If I have misunderstood please could you clarify and Ill be happy to assist further. I have attempted to solve the problem, based on my current understanding, below:

From what I could tell, column 1-4 alone wouldn't provide enough information to complete the problem. I believe you would also need a starting value for each fund. I have introduced this in the form of another table which I have then joined on to the first 4 columns. Please see the below image:

Screenshot 2025-01-09 182336.png


As for the rest of the solution, I have attempted to use the first 4 columns (and these fund values) to match the output.

Screenshot 2025-01-09 182113.png

 

I have attached a copy of the workflow below. The tools are annotated but I'm happy to expand on these if needed. Please let me know how you get on.

Regards - Pilsner 

Mike_at_CG
8 - Asteroid

@Pilsner  - Thank you for this. This is exactly what I needed.  After looking at the request I dont believe the column "left over" is even required.  I thought that was needed in the original multi row formula tool but it seems you have baked all the logic in without the need for the additional column. 

Pilsner
11 - Bolide

@Mike_at_CG - That's great to hear thank you. Glad I could help.

Mike_at_CG
8 - Asteroid

@Pilsner  - Apologies for the follow up here. And I can create a new ticket for your work to get additional credit.  The formula you provided me worked great for when I have 1 fund involved in the workflow.  However, when there is more than 1 fund it appears to blend multiple funds together and skews the results.

 

Below is how the workflow is running when there are multiple funds involved.

 

 

InvestmentAccountNumberCusip ValueInstrumentCUSIPIDAmount Needed
Fund 12257000Cusip 1117000
Fund 11920000Cusip 2-2140000
Fund 1500000Cusip 3-5010000
Fund 1191000Cusip 4-5510000
Fund 2530000Cusip 1-5806000
Fund 31685000Cusip 1-6336000
Fund 3660000Cusip 2-8021000
Fund 3265000Cusip 3-8681000
Fund 48017000Cusip 1-8946000
Fund 47000000Cusip 2-16963000
Fund 47000000Cusip 3-23963000
Fund 46580000Cusip 4-30963000
Fund 46500000Cusip 5-37543000

 

Below is what I call the happy path where if the amount needed is less than cusip value it uses amount needed and then completely moves on to the next fund.

 

InvestmentAccountNumber Cusip Value InstrumentCUSIPID Amount Needed 
Fund 1   2,257,000.00Cusip 1                117,000.00
Fund 1   1,920,000.00Cusip 2 
Fund 1       500,000.00Cusip 3 
Fund 1       191,000.00Cusip 4 
Fund 2       530,000.00Cusip 1                151,000.00
Fund 3   1,685,000.00Cusip 1                151,000.00
Fund 3       660,000.00Cusip 2 
Fund 3       265,000.00Cusip 3 
Fund 4   8,017,000.00Cusip 1                146,000.00
Fund 4   7,000,000.00Cusip 2 
Fund 4   7,000,000.00Cusip 3 
Fund 4   6,580,000.00Cusip 4 
Fund 4   6,500,000.00Cusip 5 
Fund 4   6,459,000.00Cusip 5 

 

Do you know of a way to amend the current multifield tool in order to have it generate the 2nd matrix?

 

Thank you for your time

Pilsner
11 - Bolide

Hello @Mike_at_CG 

If you are aiming to replicate the second table you have provided, there are a couple of ways to do this. The easiest would be to add a formula tool at the end of the current workflow which says, if the amount needed is less than or equal to 0, then replace the value with Null()

Screenshot 2025-02-06 212402.png

 

Another approach uses the same idea of replacing negative values with nothing, but just builds the logic into the Multi row instead of using another tool. 

 

Screenshot 2025-02-06 212601.png

I have attached a workflow which contains both of these approaches and the end result looks like this 

Screenshot 2025-02-06 212715.png

I appreciate you may not need the "results" and " left over" column but I thought I might as well include them just in case.

I hope this helps solve your problem but please let me know if not.

Regards - Pilsner

 

Labels
Top Solution Authors