Hii,
I am new to alterryx designer and learning a lot with the help of community!
Today, I want to work on visualization, I have a data for a particular country from 1960 to 2017 and I am having data as followings------------
I want to analyse data in two ways -------
1. Comperative
2. Correlative(To analyse the behaviour and dependency on each other).
Ex: GDP vs Population Vs Electricity
GDP Year | GDP Country Code | Total GDP DATA | Total Population Data | GDP Per Capita | Rural Population | Urban Population | Percentage of people having access to the electricity | People Having Access To Electricity | People Without Electricity Access |
1960 | ROY | $0 | 54,211 | $0 | 26,685 | 27,526 | 0% | 0 | 54,211 |
1961 | ROY | $0 | 55,438 | $0 | 27,297 | 28,141 | 0% | 0 | 55,438 |
1962 | ROY | $0 | 56,225 | $0 | 27,693 | 28,532 | 0% | 0 | 56,225 |
1963 | ROY | $0 | 56,695 | $0 | 27,934 | 28,761 | 0% | 0 | 56,695 |
1964 | ROY | $0 | 57,032 | $0 | 28,108 | 28,924 | 0% | 0 | 57,032 |
1965 | ROY | $0 | 57,360 | $0 | 28,278 | 29,082 | 0% | 0 | 57,360 |
1966 | ROY | $0 | 57,715 | $0 | 28,462 | 29,253 | 0% | 0 | 57,715 |
1967 | ROY | $0 | 58,055 | $0 | 28,639 | 29,416 | 0% | 0 | 58,055 |
1968 | ROY | $0 | 58,386 | $0 | 28,811 | 29,575 | 0% | 0 | 58,386 |
1969 | ROY | $0 | 58,726 | $0 | 28,988 | 29,738 | 0% | 0 | 58,726 |
1970 | ROY | $0 | 59,063 | $0 | 29,163 | 29,900 | 0% | 0 | 59,063 |
1971 | ROY | $0 | 59,440 | $0 | 29,358 | 30,082 | 0% | 0 | 59,440 |
1972 | ROY | $0 | 59,840 | $0 | 29,565 | 30,275 | 0% | 0 | 59,840 |
1973 | ROY | $0 | 60,243 | $0 | 29,773 | 30,470 | 0% | 0 | 60,243 |
1974 | ROY | $0 | 60,528 | $0 | 29,923 | 30,605 | 0% | 0 | 60,528 |
1975 | ROY | $0 | 60,657 | $0 | 29,996 | 30,661 | 0% | 0 | 60,657 |
1976 | ROY | $0 | 60,586 | $0 | 29,971 | 30,615 | 0% | 0 | 60,586 |
1977 | ROY | $0 | 60,366 | $0 | 29,871 | 30,495 | 0% | 0 | 60,366 |
1978 | ROY | $0 | 60,103 | $0 | 29,750 | 30,353 | 0% | 0 | 60,103 |
1979 | ROY | $0 | 59,980 | $0 | 29,698 | 30,282 | 0% | 0 | 59,980 |
1980 | ROY | $0 | 60,096 | $0 | 29,764 | 30,332 | 0% | 0 | 60,096 |
1981 | ROY | $0 | 60,567 | $0 | 30,007 | 30,560 | 0% | 0 | 60,567 |
1982 | ROY | $0 | 61,345 | $0 | 30,402 | 30,943 | 0% | 0 | 61,345 |
1983 | ROY | $0 | 62,201 | $0 | 30,836 | 31,365 | 0% | 0 | 62,201 |
1984 | ROY | $0 | 62,836 | $0 | 31,160 | 31,676 | 0% | 0 | 62,836 |
1985 | ROY | $0 | 63,026 | $0 | 31,264 | 31,762 | 0% | 0 | 63,026 |
1986 | ROY | $0 | 62,644 | $0 | 31,084 | 31,560 | 0% | 0 | 62,644 |
1987 | ROY | $0 | 61,833 | $0 | 30,691 | 31,142 | 0% | 0 | 61,833 |
1988 | ROY | $0 | 61,079 | $0 | 30,326 | 30,753 | 0% | 0 | 61,079 |
1989 | ROY | $0 | 61,032 | $0 | 30,312 | 30,720 | 0% | 0 | 61,032 |
1990 | ROY | $0 | 62,149 | $0 | 30,876 | 31,273 | 88% | 54,968 | 7,181 |
1991 | ROY | $0 | 64,622 | $0 | 32,115 | 32,507 | 89% | 57,372 | 7,250 |
1992 | ROY | $0 | 68,235 | $0 | 34,119 | 34,116 | 89% | 60,808 | 7,427 |
1993 | ROY | $0 | 72,504 | $0 | 36,551 | 35,953 | 89% | 64,853 | 7,651 |
1994 | ROY | $1,33,01,67,598 | 76,700 | $17,342 | 38,981 | 37,719 | 90% | 68,856 | 7,844 |
1995 | ROY | $1,32,06,70,391 | 80,324 | $16,442 | 41,152 | 39,172 | 90% | 72,364 | 7,960 |
1996 | ROY | $1,37,98,88,268 | 83,200 | $16,585 | 42,968 | 40,232 | 90% | 75,208 | 7,992 |
1997 | ROY | $1,53,18,43,575 | 85,451 | $17,927 | 44,481 | 40,970 | 91% | 77,490 | 7,961 |
1998 | ROY | $1,66,53,63,128 | 87,277 | $19,081 | 45,789 | 41,488 | 91% | 79,382 | 7,895 |
1999 | ROY | $1,72,27,98,883 | 89,005 | $19,356 | 47,060 | 41,945 | 91% | 81,176 | 7,829 |
2000 | ROY | $1,87,34,52,514 | 90,853 | $20,621 | 48,409 | 42,444 | 92% | 83,276 | 7,577 |
2001 | ROY | $1,92,02,62,570 | 92,898 | $20,671 | 49,850 | 43,048 | 92% | 85,130 | 7,768 |
2002 | ROY | $1,94,10,94,972 | 94,992 | $20,434 | 51,322 | 43,670 | 92% | 87,235 | 7,757 |
2003 | ROY | $2,02,13,01,676 | 97,017 | $20,835 | 52,771 | 44,246 | 92% | 89,278 | 7,739 |
2004 | ROY | $2,22,82,79,330 | 98,737 | $22,568 | 54,068 | 44,669 | 92% | 91,048 | 7,689 |
2005 | ROY | $2,33,10,05,587 | 1,00,031 | $23,303 | 55,142 | 44,889 | 92% | 92,436 | 7,595 |
2006 | ROY | $2,42,14,74,860 | 1,00,832 | $24,015 | 55,951 | 44,881 | 93% | 93,385 | 7,447 |
2007 | ROY | $2,62,37,26,257 | 1,01,220 | $25,921 | 56,534 | 44,686 | 93% | 93,971 | 7,249 |
2008 | ROY | $2,79,19,60,894 | 1,01,353 | $27,547 | 56,978 | 44,375 | 93% | 94,346 | 7,007 |
2009 | ROY | $2,49,89,32,961 | 1,01,453 | $24,631 | 57,401 | 44,052 | 93% | 94,711 | 6,742 |
2010 | ROY | $2,46,77,03,911 | 1,01,669 | $24,272 | 57,891 | 43,778 | 93% | 94,914 | 6,755 |
2011 | ROY | $2,58,44,63,687 | 1,02,053 | $25,325 | 58,478 | 43,575 | 94% | 95,871 | 6,182 |
2012 | ROY | $2,58,55,26,192 | 1,02,577 | $25,206 | 59,121 | 43,456 | 94% | 96,685 | 5,892 |
2013 | ROY | $2,58,65,89,134 | 1,03,187 | $25,067 | 59,789 | 43,398 | 95% | 97,592 | 5,595 |
2014 | ROY | $2,58,76,52,512 | 1,03,795 | $24,930 | 60,430 | 43,365 | 95% | 98,508 | 5,287 |
2015 | ROY | $2,58,87,16,328 | 1,04,341 | $24,810 | 61,010 | 43,331 | 95% | 99,372 | 4,969 |
2016 | ROY | $2,58,97,80,582 | 1,04,822 | $24,706 | 61,526 | 43,296 | 96% | 1,00,179 | 4,643 |
2017 | ROY | $2,59,08,45,272 | 1,05,264 | $24,613 | 61,993 | 43,271 | 96% | 1,00,604 | 4,660 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
You're doing comparative analysis for...? If you are comparing between periods, you can visualize a time series pattern of your GDP and Population metrics.
Correlation here for....? Between what....?
If you are visualizing this data, I would suggest to use it with a different platform like Power BI, QlikSense or even Tableau. If your data is granular, I would suggest for you to ETL and aggregate with Alteryx.
Correlation between: I want to know the dehaviour of the data if gdp is increasing then how does the population and electricity is performing,
I am not sure what kind of analysis you are trying to do, but be careful of bias. In addition, I am giving you an example below:
Using Spearman Correlation analysis between your variables (Total GDP, Total Population, and People having access to Electricity) - you can observe the correlation values via a Matrix as shown above.
Please ensure you have the Alteryx R Tools installed in order to use the data investigation pallete below:
Ultimately, I'd like to stress - it is less about the tools and more about your knowledge of statistics and data science to get what you want. The reason I used the Spearman Correlation over Pearson is because of the variables' perceived monotonic relationships. You'll need to validate that before you take it as fact...
Hope this helps @awanishyadavv
Thankyou, This helped me a lot.........