Hi
Input :
od t_mi | od t_si | od t_qa | t_si | t_qa | t_si2 | t_qa2 | t_si3 | t_qa3 | t_si4 | t_qa4 | t_si5 | t_qa5 | t_si6 | t_qa6 | t_si7 | t_qa7 | t_si8 | t_qa8 | t_si9 | t_qa9 |
SD001 | SD022 | 1 | SD122 | 0.23 | SD099 | 0.33 | SD400 | 0.66 | SD123 | 0.11 | SD124 | 0.22 | SD125 | 0.44 | SD211 | 0.55 | ||||
SD077 | SD088 | 0.33 | SD233 | 0.55 | SD199 | 0.55 | SD433 | 0.77 | SD544 | 0.88 | SD234 | 0.56 | SD235 | 0.34 | SD236 | 0.55 | SD237 | 0.56 | SD238 | 2 |
SD077 | SD188 | 0.23 | SD444 | 0.55 | SD199 | 0.22 | SD544 | 0.88 | SD911 | 0.1 | SD111 | 1 | SD102 | 1 |
Expected Output:
od t_mi | co | od t_si | co | od t_qa | t_si | co | t_qa | t_si2 | co | t_qa2 | t_si3 | co | t_qa3 | t_si4 | co | t_qa4 | t_si5 | co | t_qa5 | t_si6 | co | t_qa6 | t_si7 | co | t_qa7 | t_si8 | co | t_qa8 | t_si9 | co | t_qa9 |
SD001 | 111 | SD022 | 111 | 1 | SD122 | 111 | 0.23 | SD099 | 111 | 0.33 | SD400 | 111 | 0.66 | SD123 | 1133 | 0.11 | SD124 | 1133 | 0.22 | SD125 | 1133 | 0.44 | SD211 | 1133 | 0.55 | ||||||
SD077 | 111 | SD088 | 111 | 0.33 | SD233 | 111 | 0.55 | SD199 | 111 | 0.55 | SD433 | 111 | 0.77 | SD544 | 111 | 0.88 | SD234 | 1133 | 0.56 | SD235 | 1133 | 0.34 | SD236 | 1133 | 0.55 | SD237 | 1133 | 0.56 | SD238 | 1133 | 2 |
SD077 | 111 | SD188 | 111 | 0.23 | SD444 | 111 | 0.55 | SD199 | 111 | 0.22 | SD544 | 111 | 0.88 | SD911 | 1133 | 0.1 | SD111 | 1133 | 1 | SD102 | 1133 | 1 |
Solved! Go to Solution.
An example workflow follows.
As Alteryx cannot have columns with the same name, the Co column was unique. If the example works, make the necessary adjustments